AV and EV Collide, Revealing Apple's Self-driving Car Program in Action

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Accident reports sometimes reveal more than just who was at fault. A rear-end collision in Sunnyvale, California, last week was truly a product of our modern age — an electric car slamming into the back of what would have been a human-operated crossover, were it not owned by Apple.

While the iPhone maker abandoned its Project Titan self-driving car project in 2016, it didn’t leave the autonomous vehicle field altogether. The August 24th collision shows it.

According to an accident report uncovered by Reuters, the Apple test vehicle was not a so-called “iCar” — a term tossed around back when Apple had a fully self-developed vehicle in its sights — but a Lexus RX 450h outfitted with autonomous driving gear.

The report claims the Apple-operated vehicle was in autonomous mode, attempting to merge onto the southbound Lawrence Expressway at less than 1 mph, when the collision occurred. While slowed and waiting for a gap to open up (in what was hopefully very slow-moving traffic), a 2016 Nissan Leaf collided with the rear of the vehicle at a speed of about 15 miles per hour.

Apple confirmed the accident report but wouldn’t say which vehicle was at fault. Neither the human minder on board the Lexus or the driver of the Leaf sustained injuries.

In June of last year, Apple CEO Tim Cook revealed the company was indeed working on self-driving vehicle technology, calling it “the mother of all A.I. projects.” It secured a permit to test autonomous vehicles on California roads around the same time.

Still cloaked in secrecy, information on Apple’s efforts does exist. The company reportedly has 5,000 people working on the project, many of them focused on developing circuit boards and a proprietary chip. Sixty Apple test vehicle ply California’s roads, permits show. One of the tech giant’s areas of focus involves developing software to help self-driving vehicles spot pedestrians.

[Image: Lexus]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 20 comments
  • Church Church on Sep 03, 2018

    I foresee problems, that such futuristic society will think bad of few left drivers, overblaming them for slowing down/interfering with automated vehicle movement (eg. not starting to go at green light within milliseconds like eg. AVs will), and for each and every trafic incident, just like currently overblown bad rap for any accident involving AVs. Bad humans! Humans err! Shouldn't be allowed to drive and put lives at risk! And goverment will follow populistic policies/mindset of lazy majority not knowing/caring to drive themselves, rising to insane levels taxes & insurance costs for anyone still wishing to drive own car. It will probably end with retro (by then) cars be driveable by humans only on rare trackdays on special closed off tracks.

  • JMII JMII on Sep 03, 2018

    "It will probably end with retro (by then) cars be driveable by humans only on rare trackdays on special closed off tracks." Kind of like horses today. The irony will be using your AI truck to "drive" your retro car to the track to enjoy driving like the good ole days.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Sep 04, 2018

      @Erikstrawn We have horses in Massachusetts too. I have numerous neighbors that have them so it's not unusual to see them on the road. What level of autonomy is a horse considered?

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next