Apple CEO Dubs Self-driving Car Program 'the Mother of All A.I. Projects'

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Apple has been perpetually flip-flopping in terms of developing autonomous vehicles. In 2014, the company was rumored to have begun work on an autonomous electric car, codenamed “Project Titan,” with hundreds of employees devoted solely to its development.

Management issues and logistical problems impaired its progress, leading Apple to abandon the project. Since then, Bob Mansfield has fronted a renewed effort to focus on building an autonomous driving system rather than a complete car. At least, that was everyone’s best guess, as the company has been semi-secretive about its mission since day one.

That changed on Tuesday, when CEO Tim Cook confirmed that Apple does indeed have a self-driving development program. The chief executive even went so far as to call it “the mother of all A.I. projects.” That’s quite the claim to make, considering making the tech work on a car is half the battle and Apple has no practical experience building an autonomous vehicle.

“We’re focusing on autonomous systems,” Cook said in an interview on Bloomberg Television earlier this month. “It’s a core technology that we view as very important.”

He detailed his view of the future for the automotive industry as a combination of self-driving cars, electric vehicles, and ride-sharing. Apple plans to focus on autonomy, though some of Cook’s talk seemed to hint that the company hadn’t abandoned the notion of building an EV entirely. “It’s a marvelous experience not to stop at the filling station or the gas station,” Cook said.

However, the CEO’s penchant for not having to stop at the gas station — or the filing station, if you prefer — doesn’t indicate the company has any genuine plans to build a physical car. Cook just didn’t outright say that option was no longer on the table.

“We’ll see where it takes us,” he said. “We’re not really saying from a product point of view what we will do.”

It’s definitely too early for Apple to commit to anything. Despite having begun running its systems on at least one Lexus SUV, it has only recently gained an autonomous vehicle test permit to use in California. The company lags noticeably behind major automakers like Ford and General Motors, but is working on catching up.

A self-driving simulation group, which includes virtual reality expert Doug Bowman, has designed simulators that use VR to test Apple’s self-driving software. The company also invested one billion dollars into Didi Chuxing, the Chinese Uber, in 2016. Of course, none of this adds up to Apple being the first to achieve the fabled Level 5 Autonomy. It just proves it’s still a player and doesn’t want to be left out of the party.

“Clearly, one purpose of autonomous systems is self-driving cars — there are others. And we sort of see it as the mother all A.I. projects,” Cook told Bloomberg. “It’s probably one of the most difficult AI projects, actually, to work on. So autonomy is something that is incredibly exciting for us.”

[Image: iphonedigital/ Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Carguy67 Carguy67 on Jun 14, 2017

    Spot on. Our "current software QC methods" don't even catch all the simple logic and UI errors in modern software and web apps. For AI testing, we'll need psychologists and psychiatrists doing the testing.

  • Brentrn Brentrn on Jun 14, 2017

    I believe I saw Opie at the filling station today.

  • CanadaCraig You can just imagine how quickly the tires are going to wear out on a 5,800 lbs AWD 2024 Dodge Charger.
  • Luke42 I tried FSD for a month in December 2022 on my Model Y and wasn’t impressed.The building-blocks were amazing but sum of the all of those amazing parts was about as useful as Honda Sensing in terms of reducing the driver’s workload.I have a list of fixes I need to see in Autopilot before I blow another $200 renting FSD. But I will try it for free for a month.I would love it if FSD v12 lived up to the hype and my mind were changed. But I have no reason to believe I might be wrong at this point, based on the reviews I’ve read so far. [shrug]. I’m sure I’ll have more to say about it once I get to test it.
  • FormerFF We bought three new and one used car last year, so we won't be visiting any showrooms this year unless a meteor hits one of them. Sorry to hear that Mini has terminated the manual transmission, a Mini could be a fun car to drive with a stick.It appears that 2025 is going to see a significant decrease in the number of models that can be had with a stick. The used car we bought is a Mk 7 GTI with a six speed manual, and my younger daughter and I are enjoying it quite a lot. We'll be hanging on to it for many years.
  • Oberkanone Where is the value here? Magna is assembling the vehicles. The IP is not novel. Just buy the IP at bankruptcy stage for next to nothing.
  • Jalop1991 what, no Turbo trim?
Next