What's the Chinese Electric Car Startup Survival Rate? One Percent, An Investor Predicts

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
what s the chinese electric car startup survival rate one percent an investor

China has bit of a gambling problem when it comes to electric car manufacturers, though it should probably be referred to as a “gambling solution.”

The country dumps vast sums of money into hundreds of EV startups, effectively hedging its bets by placing chips on absolutely everyone. With $15 billion already invested, the nation intends to put another $47 billion toward the cause — plus whatever funding investment firms decide to contribute. While the strategy has definitely stimulated the economy, created jobs, and supersized the industry, there’s growing concern that creating a battle royale between startups could blow up in China’s face.

Even if it doesn’t, there’ll still be a bunch of automakers eating each other until only a handful remain. Previous estimates had that number riding around 5 percent of the whole. But NIO Capital, the Chinese investment firm that’s already invested a gratuitous amount of funds into advanced automotive tech, claims the actual number will be far lower — probably around 1 percent.

Based on the ever-growing number of Chinese EV companies, that amounts to five firms.

“It’s a very complicated system that needs abundant investments and a large group of people to be able to build a car from scratch,” NIO Capital’s Managing Partner Ian Zhu in interview with Bloomberg. “Therefore, the survival rate of all these EV startups will be very low.”

He also said his firm prefers to fund cooperative projects between startups and traditional carmakers because they combine innovation with real manufacturing capabilities. Most new EV companies are nowhere near ready to build a car capable of being mass produced. That’s true for some of the more established automakers, too.

However, the mere prospect of delivering an electric vehicle seems enough to blow these new firms’ share prices through the ceiling. Meanwhile, traditional Chinese car makers lacking a slick (and largely hypothetical) EV have watched their stock valuation dwindle through 2018. That trend is expected to continue until all but a few of these companies go out of business.

[Image: Byton]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • TDIandThen.... TDIandThen.... on Aug 13, 2018

    I think we're overdue for a serious article from TTAC on NEVS, the Chinese group that bought up Saab assets and is slowly ramping up production of their electric 9-3 for Chinese car-share firm and the Swedish market. For all the beautiful wacky Swedish engineers, auto jobs and future new kooky autos, for thee, I pray. Well I'm agnostic but you get the idea.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Aug 15, 2018

    Well...in the smog choked Chinese megacities, a few electrics could definitively help.

  • Marky S. I own the same C.C. XSE Hybrid AWD as in this article, but in Barcelona Red with the black roof. I love my car for its size, packaging, and the fact that it offers both AWD and Hybrid technology together. Visibility is impressive, as is its small turning circle. I consider the C.C. more of a "station wagon" by proportion, rather than an “SUV.” It is fun to drive, with zippy response and perky pick-up. It is a pleasant car to drive and ride in. It is not trying to be a “Butch Off-Roader”, or a cosseting “Luxury Cruiser.” Those are not its goals or purpose. The Corolla Cross XSE Hybrid AWD is a wonderful All-Purpose Car (O.K. – “SUV” if you must hear me say it!) with a combination of all the features it has at a reasonable price.
  • Ernesto Perez There's a line in the movie Armageddon where Bruce Willis says " is this the best idea NASA came up with?". Don't quote me. I'm asking is this the best idea NY came up with? What's next? Charging pedestrians to walk in certain parts of the city? Every year the price for everything gets more expensive and most of the services we pay for gets worse. Obviously more money is not the solution. What we need are better ideas, strategies and inventions. You want to charge drivers in the city - then put tolls on the free bridges like the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges. There's always a better way or product. It's just the idiots on top think they know best.
  • Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
  • Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
  • FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
Next