QOTD: In the Mood for a Swap?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Let’s face it — things get stale. Sliding into the same old heap every day, fiddling with the ignition, trying to get the motor running. Sometimes, just when you think you’ve got the spark… nothing happens. Then you’re left with your hood up, searching through your phone for the right contact.

Enterprise, perhaps, or maybe your local dealer.

That’s the reality for many old car owners. Sometimes, as is expected in our disposable society, a car’s time comes. We build obsolescence into our vehicles — parts dry up, metal gives way to rust, maintenance costs rise, and suddenly, keeping a classic (or “classic”) on the road just isn’t worth it anymore. But there’s always the option of bringing on a new partner to keep those combustion chamber fires burning.

With yourself as one of the points of the triangle, which automotive three-way do you have in mind?

I think of this as the 24 Hours of LeMons kicks off during Monterey Car Weeeeeaak. This tweet provided the inspiration. Yes, a 1954 Nash — the Statesman model, apparently — with a 2.3-liter Ford EcoBoost under the hood.

We’ve talked about the potential heresy of engine swaps before, but today we spin the practice in a more positive light. Diluting a car’s purity with an engine from another brand (or another era) doesn’t mean the car ceases to exist. Maybe it’s hard sourcing a pristine Dual Powerflyte Six these days; who knows?

If it keeps a classic body on the road for just a little while longer, can we really complain? How many 1970s MGBs now contain a 60-degree GM V6? A former co-worker once dropped the powertrain from a 1993 Mustang GT into his 1982 Thunderbird Town Landau and loved every minute of it. (The car, as well as its resale value, no doubt thanked him, too.)

So, using this ’54 Nash as a starting point, let’s list our top engine swap visions. Practical or outlandish; it doesn’t matter. We can talk about 350/Hydramatic applications for days, but I’ve always thought an old British Ford with a 1.0-liter EcoBoost would be fun. A gutless Prefect or Zodiac Mk. II, perhaps, though an American Fairmont with a three-pot seems like an amusing possibility. Certainly a better choice than the original base Fairmont motor.

What say you, B&B?

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 83 comments
  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Aug 24, 2018

    I have an '87 Jaguar XJ6 that I put a 500cid Cadillac motor into for 24 Hours of Lemons purposes. The car has never failed to fail me. Sounds awesome, but can't stay on track. My second project is putting a half-bridgeported Mazda 12A rotary into a '58 Sunbeam Alpine.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Sep 12, 2018

    Ever since I was a little kid, I've wondered what the largest engine was that could be stuffed into a Beetle...

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next