Japan's Minor Scandal: Mazda, Suzuki, Yamaha Apologize for Improper Vehicle Testing

japans minor scandal mazda suzuki yamaha apologize for improper vehicle testing

Japan’s automotive industry finds itself in the midst of a minor scandal. Last year, the Japanese government ordered manufacturers to investigate their operations after it was revealed that Subaru and Nissan conducting improper testing for decades. Initially, the issue seemed to revolve around a widespread laziness that allowed uncertified employees to conduct final inspection procedures. However, Subaru later admitted to employees falsifying emissions data.

While the problem does not appear to be an outright corporate conspiracy, some inspectors still decided to implement a policy they knew was against the rules to avoid questions from top brass. Likewise, senior employees advised inspectors to change test results for each vehicle that failed to meet internal quality control standards.

On Thursday, the Japanese government announced the inspection issue haS also touched Mazda Motor Corp, Suzuki Motor Corp and Yamaha Motor Co (which builds motorcycles and automotive engines). All three companies are now faulted for improper testing procedures and compliance failures.

Again, the new batch of industry faults does not appear criminal in nature, but does show Japanese automakers cutting corners. According to Bloomberg, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said that Suzuki, Mazda and Yamaha cleared vehicles for emissions or fuel efficiency even in cases where the testing occurred under invalid conditions. This resulted in slight deviations in the speed of the vehicles that should have scrapped the test results.

Japan imposes a rather rigorous final inspection procedure that requires a specially certified technician. In some instances, this person may not have been on hand to sign off on vehicles and an uncertified employee was left with the task. This process is only implemented for vehicles sold in Japan, and isn’t applicable for vehicles exported to other countries.

Since none of the automakers claimed to have found significant problems with the actual emissions and fuel economy performance of the vehicles, there are currently no planned recalls. That could change, however, as the earlier bout with Nissan and Subaru did eventually end up with Japanese vehicles requiring repairs.

Suzuki said that of 12,819 sample vehicles tested for fuel economy and emissions since June 2012, roughly 50 percent of them were “inspected improperly.” That’s worse than Subaru, which found that 903 of 6,500 sample cars were subjected to falsified emission data.

Mazda said there were irregularities in 4 percent of similar inspections on its cars, while Yamaha found irregularities in just 2 percent of inspections. The issue is believed to go back several years. In Suzuki’s case they stretched back to 2012. We presume those dates could stretch further back, as Nissan’s investigation revealed that the certification problem may have begun as far back as 1979.

While these problems have not been deemed criminal, they do place a black mark on the Eastern nation’s automotive industry. Major suppliers like Kobe Steel, Toray Industries, and Mitsubishi Materials Corp have also admitted to falsifying data last year.

The companies have all publicly apologized for their mistakes and are working with the Japanese government to get to the bottom of the issue. Meanwhile, critics are throwing accusations from every angle. Some claim Japanese regulatory measures and mandated inspection procedures are unnecessary, as others fault automakers for intentionally falsifying information and throwing lower-level employees under the bus to avoid repercussions. Since the government doesn’t appear interested in enacting an investigation on par with something like Volkswagen’s emissions scandal (primarily because the issue seems widespread but rather shallow), we’ll likely never know the full truth.

Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts The sweet spot of this generation isn't made anymore: the SRT 392. The Scat Pack is more or less filling the same space but it lacks a lot of the goodies, including SRT suspension, brakes, and seats. The Hellcat is too much and isn't available with a manual anymore.
  • Arthur Dailey I am normally a fan of Exner's designs but by this time the front end on the Stutz like most of the rest of the vehicle is a laughable monstrosity of gauche. The interior finishes suit the rest of the vehicle. Corey please put this series out of its misery. This is one vehicle manufacturer best left on the scrap heap of history.
  • Art Vandelay I always thought what my Challenger really needed was a convertible top to make it heavier and make visability worse.
  • Dlc65688410 Please stop, we can't take anymore of this. Think about doing something on the Spanish Pegaso.
  • MaintenanceCosts A few bits of context largely missing from this article:(1) For complicated historical reasons, the feds already end up paying much of the cost of buying new transit buses of all types. It is easier legally and politically to put capital funds than operating funds into the federal budget, so the model that has developed in most US agencies is that operational costs are raised from a combination of local taxes and fares while the feds pick up much of the agencies' capital needs. So this is not really new spending but a new direction for spending that's been going on for a long time.(2) Current electric buses are range-challenged. Depending on type of service they can realistically do 100-150 miles on a charge. That's just fine for commuter service where the buses typically do one or two trips in the morning, park through the midday, and do one or two trips in the evening. It doesn't work well for all-day service. Instead of having one bus that can stay out from early in the morning until late at night (with a driver change or two) you need to bring the bus back to the garage once or twice during the day. That means you need quite a few more buses and also increases operating costs. Many agencies are saying for political reasons that they are going to go electric in this replacement cycle but the more realistic outcome is that half the buses can go electric while the other half need one more replacement cycle for battery density to improve. Once the buses can go 300 miles in all weather they will be fine for the vast majority of service.(3) With all that said, the transition to electric will be very good. Moving from straight diesel to hybrid already cut down substantially on emissions, but even reduced diesel emissions cause real public health damage in city settings. Transitioning both these buses and much of the urban truck fleet to electric will have measurable and meaningful impacts on public health.