New Import Duties Could Body Slam Subaru

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Subaru is a once-tiny manufacturer that grew in leaps and bounds thanks to high demand from the United States. The automaker is the eighth best-selling brand in the region, despite being a scrappy upstart, and has managed multiply its volume many since the 1990s. But, like any business loaded into a cannon with the word “success” emblazoned on the side, it can’t continue streaming through the clouds indefinitely without encountering some turbulence.

Subaru may be in for troubled times.

With the U.S. threatening new tariffs on imported cars, the automaker may have to readapt its strategy. Subaru may be an increasingly popular brand for the region, but it’s not one that’s built primarily within its borders. North America accounts for 71 percent of Subaru’s world volume, but a lot of those vehicles have to be shipped in from overseas.

“Half our sales are exports from Japan,” Subaru President Tomomi Nakamura explained this month. “We take the U.S. tariff issue very seriously. It wouldn’t be so easy to move production from Japan to the U.S. just to avoid the impact from a proposed tariff hike.”

Toyota, which builds the majority of its vehicles for the North American market within its borders, has already said that new tariffs would increase prices. Meanwhile, Mazda is making a fuss that it may have to withdraw from investment plans within the United States, claiming the tariff threat would be detrimental to the wellbeing of automakers. Honda has been relatively quiet — possibly because it builds a larger percentage of its cars inside the U.S. than some historically American companies.

Be that as it may, all companies will have to take a bite of the shit sandwich if these tariffs come to pass. But Subaru’s reliance on imports may make for an unpleasantly sizable portion. Nakamura has only been president of the company for a month (due to the Japanese inspection scandal) but he understands the American market — his previous position was CEO of Subaru of America. He knows the Western market is essential for the brand’s health and future growth. But he’s not sure what can be done right now.

The automaker’s goals revolve around improving technology and strengthening profits through sales. Subaru may build a good product, but it’s often lacking in the advanced technological wizardry offered by other brands — which some might not see as real problem. However, it intends to change that by tapping Toyota for help with electrification and implementing vehicle connectivity in the coming years.

According to Automotive News, Subaru’s corporate strategy has placed an emphasis on modernizing its fleet as quickly as possible. It intends to place the majority of its lineup on a digital network, while also introducing a new hybrid model and Level 2 autonomous highway driving capabilities sometime in the early 2020s. It also wants a new SUV to help bolster global sales. But its immediate plan just involves moving metal in the United States.

“We still view this region as a frontier market for us,” Nakamura said. “We will continue measures aimed at the Sunbelt region, where the ownership of Subaru cars is still low.”

All of this is costing the company money. Research and development isn’t cheap, even with help from another automaker, and trying to boosts its business in the Sunbelt could be an expensive prospect if customers don’t respond. At this point, Subaru can really only stay the course and hope things work out (as Americans keep buying). Shifting production away from Japan is unrealistic — and potentially foolish, since it doesn’t know what the U.S. will actually do on the tariff front yet. But if the nation does decide to persist with economic warfare, Subaru may have to postpone its upward trajectory and prepare itself for a beating.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
20 of 56 comments
  • VW4motion VW4motion on Jul 16, 2018

    trump pretty much showed his empty hand today while putin body slammed him on camera. These tariffs will go away soon.

    • See 8 previous
    • SSJeep SSJeep on Jul 18, 2018

      Sceptic, you are incorrect on both. The US imports platinum from South Africa mostly, not Russia. The US also produces about 3% of the worlds platinum and runs a platinum surplus - so much so that the US mint strikes platinum eagles for investment purposes. Titanium is also produced by the US but largely comes from China and South Africa. In the event of a platinum supply constriction, cat con manufacturers will just switch to palladium. Please research before calling others out falsely.

  • Wheatridger Wheatridger on Jul 16, 2018

    What if it turns out that Subaru's technical progress was stalled by the siren song of the flat-four engine? Just like Volkswagen, who kindly provided Subaru with many so many of its customers over the years. VW stick with the basic Beetle layout for too long, it's now believed. Subaru's showing the same lack of diversity in its powertrains now, and it could hurt them.

    • See 8 previous
    • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Jul 18, 2018

      @TW5 And thanks to you also, TW5. Good points.

  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
  • Wjtinfwb Very fortunate so far; the fleet ranges from 2002 to 2023, the most expensive car to maintain we have is our 2020 Acura MDX. One significant issue was taken care of under warranty, otherwise, 6 oil changes at the Acura dealer at $89.95 for full-synthetic and a new set of Michelin Defenders and 4-wheel alignment for 1300. No complaints. a '16 Subaru Crosstrek and '16 Focus ST have each required a new battery, the Ford's was covered under warranty, Subaru's was just under $200. 2 sets of tires on the Focus, 1 set on the Subie. That's it. The Focus has 80k on it and gets synthetic ever 5k at about $90, the Crosstrek is almost identical except I'll run it to 7500 since it's not turbocharged. My '02 V10 Excursion gets one oil change a year, I do it myself for about $30 bucks with Synthetic oil and Motorcraft filter from Wal-Mart for less than $40 bucks. Otherwise it asks for nothing and never has. My new Bronco is still under warranty and has no issues. The local Ford dealer sucks so I do it myself. 6 qts. of full syn, a Motorcraft cartridge filter from Amazon. Total cost about $55 bucks. Takes me 45 minutes. All in I spend about $400/yr. maintaining cars not including tires. The Excursion will likely need some front end work this year, I've set aside a thousand bucks for that. A lot less expensive than when our fleet was smaller but all German.
Next