'LQ' Marks the Spot: What Does Toyota's Odd Trademark Application Mean?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Trademark applications provide a very hazy window into the future of an automaker’s lineup, and this one’s no different. On May 7th, Toyota filed an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for use of the name “LQ” on a motor vehicle.

While it partially fits into the Lexus brand’s naming scheme, the second letter of the name (after L for “luxury”) is meant to designate the style of vehicle. So, just what kind of flagship model could this be?

The trademark application, uncovered by Lexus Enthusiast, seems to point to a different type of vehicle. In the upper echelon of the Lexus stable, “LS” means a luxury sedan, “LC” designates a luxury coupe, and “LX” covers the SUV/crossover field.

So, what about that Q? The best guess out there is that “Q” refers to a sportier luxury crossover, possibly one previewed by the brand’s LF-1 Limitless concept vehicle. Far more athletic than the range-topping LX SUV or midsize RX, the unibody, comparatively low slung Limitless debuted at January’s Detroit auto show with no production promises in tow.

Still, the automaker claimed the concept had “the potential to shape the future of a flagship luxury crossover for Lexus.”

Crafted at CALTY Design Research, the crossover showed off what could become the brand’s future styling direction. The jury’s out on whether that’s a good thing. With creases aplenty and an evolution of Lexus’ signature spindle grille leading the way, the crossover’s rakish profile oozed sportiness. Dual rear spoilers completed the look. Lexus claimed the concept could handle any number of propulsion sources.

While there’s no shortage of crossovers and SUVs in both the Toyota and Lexus lineups, the company has hinted it isn’t against fielding two vehicles in the same segment. The LQ could easily become another cash cow positioned near (or at) the top of the Lexus heap.

[Images: Lexus, Bozi Tatarevic/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on May 16, 2018

    "LQ": Looks Quotidian at best . . . I only buy American . . . End of Story . . .

  • Compaq Deskpro Compaq Deskpro on May 17, 2018

    Slightly lifted Yaris with 20 inch rims and a tiny hatchback and rubbish leather seats, it will sell like gangbusters to widespread acclaim.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next