General Motors Files Patent Application for 'Transforming' Cars

general motors files patent application for 8216 transforming cars

General Motors has filed one of the strangest patent requests we’ve ever seen, one that gives vehicles the ability to change their shape. Up until now, a GM-branded transformer was something that only existed in the movies. But it would seem the automaker hopes to develop a real-world example someday.

While the concept and patent drawings mirror an idea I developed as a six-year old with a box of crayons, it does have some practical applications. GM has made it clear it sees a future rife with autonomous vehicles and ride-sharing. However, operating a theoretical fleet of self-driving vehicles comes with numerous hurdles. One of the biggest is finding a place to store them.

Having computer-controlled cars mill about endlessly is inefficient, but so is storing them in a central hub. Ideally, you would locate them in small clusters near the area they’re meant to serve. That’s easier said than done in urban environments. But if a car could somehow collapse itself to half its normal size, new parking opportunities suddenly become available.

GM Inside News, which first discovered GM’s patent filing for “Method and Systems for Reconfiguring a Vehicle Geometry,” speculates it could be used to enhance aerodynamics. How those gains would offset the added weight a system like this would necessitate is unclear.

There are also questions about how structurally competent something like this would be. Expanding panels would need to be reinforced to adhere to modern crash standards. The more there are, the harder it becomes.

It’s all very strange, possibly even weirder than Ford’s attempt to patent a “multimodal transportation apparatus” that combined a gas-powered car with a small electric motorcycle. The idea there was to hide the bike inside the center of the car and shoot it out of the front once the car is parked. From there, the driver use the e-bike to make the final leg of the journey.

Honda already tried this by tucking the gas-powered Motocompo in the backs of small city cars decades ago. While the notion was exceptionally interesting, the mobility solution lacked the practical necessary to allow it to flourish. We doubt Ford is seriously considering implementing its take on the idea with a production vehicle. If anything, it probably just wants to protect an idea one of its engineers dreamed up.

This could be what’s happening with General Motors, too. While the transforming structure is intriguing, it’s even harder to imagine how it would work in practice than Ford’s hidden scooter. GM’s concept doodles take numerous approaches. One has a clamshell-like rooftop that extends when passengers are present but retracts when they leave, while another deforms the exterior of the vehicles sides with collapsable panels to make the car wider or more narrow.

All of the designs are fairly odd and we’re doubtful we’ll see it on any of them on anything other than a fantastical concept vehicle — if we see them at all.

[Image: General Motors]

Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Peter Gazis Peter Gazis on May 10, 2018

    How about an SUV that transforms into a pick-up.

  • OneAlpha OneAlpha on May 11, 2018

    This is why I'd rather watch TV shows and movies about the future than actually live there. Not only didn't we get the flying car, the jetpack, the laser rifle, the rocket ship or any of the other awesome things that they said were just around the corner, but now that somebody's seriously trying to developing a transforming car, it won't be KITT's Super Pursuit Mode or the Viper Defender. Instead, it'll be that car from the old cartoon that folds up into a suitcase so the guy doesn't have to park it.

  • Johnster Not feelin' it. The traditional unreliability of turbo engines is a big turn-off, especially in a work truck that (I hope) you'd want to keep on the road for 200,000 miles or more without having major repairs.
  • ToolGuy Car audio is way overpriced.
  • Marty S The original Charger was a 2 door, as was the landmark 68 model. Its funny that some younger commenters are surprised that its not a four door. I never understood why modern Chargers have been four door sedans. I think the best looking Charger was the 68, absolutely perfect in its lines and proportions. This concept really emulates that and I think I think it looks great.
  • Master Baiter The D-bag elites like Al Gore demanding that we all switch to EVs are the type of people who don't actually drive. They get chauffeured around in black Yukon Denalis. Tesla does have a good charging network--maybe someday they will produce a car that doesn't suck.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird As a Challenger GT awd owner I lIke it’s heritage inspired styling a lot. There’s a lot of 66-67 as well as 68-70 Charger in there. It’s refreshing that it doesn’t look like a blob like Tesla, Volt/Bolt, Mach-e BMW I whatever etc. The fact that it’s a hatch makes it even better as a everyday driver thus eliminating the need for a CUV. If it’s well built and has a reliable track record I can see trading up to it in a few years.