General Motors Files Patent Application for 'Transforming' Cars
General Motors has filed one of the strangest patent requests we’ve ever seen, one that gives vehicles the ability to change their shape. Up until now, a GM-branded transformer was something that only existed in the movies. But it would seem the automaker hopes to develop a real-world example someday.
While the concept and patent drawings mirror an idea I developed as a six-year old with a box of crayons, it does have some practical applications. GM has made it clear it sees a future rife with autonomous vehicles and ride-sharing. However, operating a theoretical fleet of self-driving vehicles comes with numerous hurdles. One of the biggest is finding a place to store them.
Having computer-controlled cars mill about endlessly is inefficient, but so is storing them in a central hub. Ideally, you would locate them in small clusters near the area they’re meant to serve. That’s easier said than done in urban environments. But if a car could somehow collapse itself to half its normal size, new parking opportunities suddenly become available.
GM Inside News, which first discovered GM’s patent filing for “Method and Systems for Reconfiguring a Vehicle Geometry,” speculates it could be used to enhance aerodynamics. How those gains would offset the added weight a system like this would necessitate is unclear.
There are also questions about how structurally competent something like this would be. Expanding panels would need to be reinforced to adhere to modern crash standards. The more there are, the harder it becomes.
It’s all very strange, possibly even weirder than Ford’s attempt to patent a “multimodal transportation apparatus” that combined a gas-powered car with a small electric motorcycle. The idea there was to hide the bike inside the center of the car and shoot it out of the front once the car is parked. From there, the driver use the e-bike to make the final leg of the journey.
Honda already tried this by tucking the gas-powered Motocompo in the backs of small city cars decades ago. While the notion was exceptionally interesting, the mobility solution lacked the practical necessary to allow it to flourish. We doubt Ford is seriously considering implementing its take on the idea with a production vehicle. If anything, it probably just wants to protect an idea one of its engineers dreamed up.
This could be what’s happening with General Motors, too. While the transforming structure is intriguing, it’s even harder to imagine how it would work in practice than Ford’s hidden scooter. GM’s concept doodles take numerous approaches. One has a clamshell-like rooftop that extends when passengers are present but retracts when they leave, while another deforms the exterior of the vehicles sides with collapsable panels to make the car wider or more narrow.
All of the designs are fairly odd and we’re doubtful we’ll see it on any of them on anything other than a fantastical concept vehicle — if we see them at all.
[Image: General Motors]
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Leonard Ostrander Pet peeve: Drivers who swerve to the left to make a right turn and vice versa. They take up as much space as possible for as long as possible as though they're driving trailer trucks or school busses. It's a Kia people, not a Kenworth! Oh, and use your turn signals if you ever figure out where you're going.
- Master Baiter This is horrible. Delaying this ban will raise the Earth's temperature by 0.00000001°C in the year 2100.
- Alan Buy a Skoda Superb.
- Alan In Australia only hairdressers would buy this Monaro as its known as. Real men had 4 door sedans and well hung men drive 4x4 dual cab utes with bullbars and towbars. I personally think this is butt ugly. Later iterations of the Commodore were far better looking.
- Jeff As a few commenters on prior articles on this site about the UAW strike mentioned many of the lower tiered suppliers could go bankrupt and some could possibly go out of business if the strike is prolonged. Decades ago Ford and GM owned many of their own suppliers but as we all know over the years manufacturers have been outsourcing more parts and with just in time supply there is little room for any interruptions to production including strikes, natural disasters, and anything unforeseen that could happen. When the strike ends there will be delays in production due to parts shortages. It costs suppliers money to just keep making parts and stockpiling them especially when many parts have razor thin profit margins.