Dodge the Security, Ram the Gate: New Pickups Stolen From Factory

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Police in Michigan are flummoxed and frustrated after a theft of nearly a dozen brand new Ram pickups from the Warren Truck Assembly Plant. Like a scene from Gone in 60 Seconds, the ne’er-do-wells are alleged to have crashed freshly manufactured Rams through secured gates before hightailing it south on Mound Road.

“This was well-planned,” said Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer, who takes home top honors in today’s Most Obvious Statement competition.

The thieves apparently drove to the plant in a 2003 Ram pickup (very considerate of the robbers to stay on brand) they allegedly stole earlier in the day from a residence in Warren. After offloading a dozen or so drivers, someone cut a hole in the plant’s fence to gain yard access. In what must have been a scene from Grand Theft Auto V, the pickups then crashed through a metal gate and took off in a southerly direction.

A security guard saw all this go down, calling the cops at 3:55 a.m. while watching in disbelief as factory fresh trucks roared out of the compound. Can’t say I blame the person for their action – armed or not, I wouldn’t have been eager to face off with a dozen or more burglars bent on making off with heavy trucks. Cops are seeking security footage from FCA and nearby businesses.

Unauthorized appropriation of so many new vehicles from a secure lot suggest someone’s “filling an order,” according to theft experts interviewed by the Detroit Free Press. “We’re calling it the mass order business,” said Mark Wagenschutz, executive director of a Michigan agency funded by the insurance companies to help eliminate auto theft, in a statement to Freep.

For his part, top cop Dwyer isn’t speculating whether this is the work of a crime ring, citing the open and ongoing investigation. It is entirely possible the thieves were not after the model-year 2018 Ram pickups as a unit but rather seeking a specific part of truck like the nav system. Foiling that theory is a nav system that’s the same in just about everything FCA makes. They didn’t need to take Rams for that.

On the other hand, if this is an “order” by some oligarch or far-flung warlord, the trucks could very well have been quickly loaded onto a non-descript carrier and hauled off. It wouldn’t take long to get the machines to a port, stuff them in a container, and ship the works offshore.

Dwyer apparently expressed frustration at FCA’s snail-like response time, kvetching that the company was still doing inventory 12 hours after the theft, working to figure out VINs and colors to help track down the stolen vehicles. Right now, police are saying they have no leads.

The investigation continues. (I’ve always wanted to end a post that way.)

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next