What's Standing Between You and a Future Citron or Peugeot? Possibly, a Tariff

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
whats standing between you and a future citron or peugeot possibly a tariff

The threat of new import tariffs has PSA Group worried about its plan to return to the United States. Following President Trump’s proposal to levy a 25-percent tax on steel imports and a 10-percent tariff on inbound aluminum, Europe balked at the suggestion, leading to further threats of a car tariff.

Right now, the U.S. levies a 2.5-percent tax on imported European vehicles, far less than Europe’s 10-percent tariff on vehicle travelling eastward across the Atlantic. There’s a 25-percent U.S. tariff on European vans and trucks, too, which explains why crates of Mercedes-Benz van components sail into the port of Charleston, South Carolina at regular intervals.

According to Trump, any European retaliation against the proposed metal tariffs — which seem all the more likely given yesterday’s resignation of the president’s pro-free trade economic advisor, Gary Cohn — would see the U.S. ratchet up its car tariff. If the scenario comes to pass, your dreams of one day buying a new French car in America could easily be dashed.

Speaking to Automotive News at the Geneva Motor Show, PSA Group CEO Carlos Tavares said he’s watching the situation closely. A new vehicle tariff could make the automaker reconsider its 10-year U.S. re-entry plan.

“If the overall framework of tariffs change, it may have an impact on our strategy,” Tavares said Tuesday. “That’s clear, because if we don’t have a profitable business plan, then we don’t go.”

Under the existing plan, the maker of Citroën, Peugeot, and DS vehicles wants to gradually ease back into a market it vacated in 1991, first with ride-sharing programs and other mobility efforts, and later with its own vehicles. A full return would occur by 2026. PSA already has a staffed North American headquarters in Atlanta guiding the initiative.

“The tariffs, if they were to exist, would have an impact on the way we go to market, because we have a very staged and step-by-step approach,” Tavares said. “That means that at the beginning we would source the cars from outside the U.S., given the very limited volumes. If this was to change we would have to reassess our strategy.”

While German automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen already have a strong U.S. manufacturing presence, Trump’s threats aren’t being taken lightly. German automakers imported half a million vehicles to the U.S. last year. According to Germany’s Center for Automotive Research, boosted European car tariffs could cut the automakers’ profits by 10 percent.

“Roughly speaking, German carmakers achieve between 10 and 13 percent of their profits in the US,” Metzler bank analyst Jürgen Pieper told Deutsche Welle. “Should a 10 percent duty be imposed, that would perhaps reduce profits in the US by a third.”

As for PSA, Tavares isn’t freaking out just yet. Taking an optimistic tone, the executive said, “Of course, we prefer global trade and we prefer open markets. That’s much better for everybody at the end of the day. I feel that good sense will prevail.”

[Image: PSA Group]

Join the conversation
3 of 122 comments
  • Voyager Voyager on Mar 09, 2018

    The EU is more serious about reducing emissions and fossil energy dependency overall. So, no wonder big V8-powered cars are taxed accordingly. What does need to change, is what TTAC mentions: the U.S. lighter tariffs in general on import cars; make that on par with what the EU is charging.

  • TruthSeeker TruthSeeker on Mar 09, 2018

    I just heard today that Canada and Mexico are to be exempt from tariffs on steel and aluminum... wonder what that will stir up in the EU?

    • Admin Admin on Mar 09, 2018

      It will certainly prove to be interesting.

  • SCE to AUX Toyota the follower, as usual. It will be 5 years before such a vehicle is available.I can't think of anything innovative from them since the Gen 1 Prius. Even their mythical solid state battery remains vaporware.They look like pre-2009 General Motors. They could fall hard.
  • Chris P Bacon I've always liked the looks of the Clubman, especially the original model. But like a few others here, I've had the Countryman as a rental, and for the price point, I couldn't see spending my own money on one. Maybe with a stick it would be a little more fun, but that 3 cylinder engine just couldn't provide the kick I expected.
  • EBFlex Recall number 13 for the 2020 Explorer and the 2020 MKExplorer.
  • CEastwood Every time something like this is mentioned it almost never happens because the auto maker is afraid of it taking sales away from an existing model - the Tacoma in this instance . It's why VW never brought the Scirrocco and Polo stateside fearful of losing Golf sales .
  • Bca65698966 V6 Accord owner here. The VTEC crossover is definitely a thing, especially after I got a performance tune for the car. The loss of VTEC will probably result in a slower vehicle overall for one reason: power under the curve. While the peak horsepower may remain the same, the amount of horsepower and torque up to that peak may be less overall. The beauty of variable cam lift is not only the ability to gain more power at upper rpm’s on the “big cam”, but the ability to gain torque down low on the “small cam”. Low rpm torque gets the vehicle moving and then big horsepower at upper rpm’s gains speed. Having only one cam profile is now introducing a compromise versus the VTEC setup. I guess it’s possible that with direct injection they are able to keep the low rpm torque there (I’ve read that DI helps with low rpm torque) but I’m skeptical it will match a well tuned variable lift setup.