New Toyota Auris Previews Next-generation Corolla IM Hatchback for North America

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Toyota Corolla iM is a bit of a paradox. The bodywork suggests it could be a fun-loving hot hatch, but the illusion dissipates the second you climb into the driver’s seat. The engine seems sick, unfit for the task it has been given, and the ergonomics leave something to be desired. While it’s not really much worse than the Corolla sedan, and it is a serviceable daily commuter for those wanting something affordably efficient, it doesn’t seem up to par with Toyota’s usual fare.

With Scion dead and buried in North America and the Corolla sedan outselling the iM ten-to-one, we’ve wondered if Toyota would even bother keeping the hatchback around. But it looks like it will. The automaker previewed the new Auris hatchback — a European model nearly identical to the Toyota (formerly Scion) iM — in Geneva this week, offering strong hints that it will make its way westward.

The overall concept has changed very little, but the new Auris transitions to the TNGA platform underpinning a good chunk of the brand’s fleet — including the current Corolla sedan in its next incarnation. It also appears to be more upscale, offering a two-tone roof and LED-infused illumination. However, we’re curious about the interior. The current iM feels rather cheap inside and has some of the worst ergonomics in recent memory. The armrest placement on the door is so comically bad, the driver’s side might as well not even have one.

While we aren’t sure if Toyota addressed this issue, it did fine-tune its engine lineup. As an economy car, it makes sense to offer it with a bevy of efficient engines. Toyota claims the next-generation Auris offers a conventional gasoline engine and at least two hybrid powertrains. The hybrids range from a 122-horsepower 1.8-liter unit to a 2.0-liter with 178 hp. However, the internal combustion unit is the same 1.2-liter turbo from the Euro-spec Yaris and CH-R.

That leaves us wondering what’s coming to North America. Toyota wasn’t willing to confirm whether or not the hybrids will make it here, but that 1.2-liter turbo doesn’t seem like an option. When it came time for the brand to bring the CH-R stateside, it opted to give it the old 2.0-liter and left the little turbo in Europe. Despite the larger engine’s extra helping of horsepower, the turbo unit’s early access to torque makes up for the disparity in overall power. So the question stands: what will the new Corolla hatch have under the hood when and if it gets here?

Whatever it is, we are willing to bet Toyota scraps the iM name to fully rope it in with the rest of the Corolla lineup. The hatchback will also come equipped with a new multilink rear suspension and wider footprint for improved handling. An inch shorter than the outgoing model, the new Auris hosts a wheelbase that’s lengthened by 1.6 inches. There’s also a lower roofline.

Odds are good the Corolla iM wouldn’t be updated until next year but, when that happens, it should be exceptionally similar to the new Auris. We’ve got our fingers crossed that the upmarket hybrid and its cheaper alternative will solve the current iM’s lethargy problem. If Toyota can also do something about the lackluster ergonomics, the hatch should be a solid little car, and perhaps worthy of the praise the current model lacks.

[Images: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Nick0264 Nick0264 on Mar 09, 2018

    Should I be disturbed by the front end of this car or do I have an overly active imagination?

  • Lightspeed Lightspeed on Mar 10, 2018

    I always thought the Lexus CT2ooh should have been sold as a Toyota Celica. Likewise, I think if they put the Celica name on the is new hatchback, they'd sell a lot more.

  • MaintenanceCosts The Truth About Isuzu Troopers!
  • Jalop1991 MC's silence in this thread is absolutely deafening.
  • MaintenanceCosts Spent some time last summer with a slightly older Expedition Max with about 100k miles on the clock, borrowed from a friend for a Colorado mountain trip.It worked pretty well on the trip we used it for. The EcoBoost in this fairly high state of tune has a freight train feeling and just keeps pulling even way up at 12k ft. There is unending space inside; at one point we had six adults, two children, and several people's worth of luggage inside, with room left over. It was comfortable to ride in and well-equipped.But it is huge. My wife refused to drive it because she couldn't get comfortable with the size. I used to be a professional bus driver and it reminded me quite a bit of driving a bus. It was longer than quite a few parking spots. Fortunately, the trip didn't involve anything more urban than Denver suburbs, so the size didn't cause any real problems, but it reminded me that I don't really want such a behemoth as a daily driver.
  • Jalop1991 It seems to me this opens GM to start substituting parts and making changes without telling anyone, AND without breaking any agreements with Allison. Or does no one remember Ignitionswitchgate?At the core of the problem is a part in the vehicle's ignition switch that is 1.6 millimeters less "springy" than it should be. Because this part produces weaker tension, ignition keys in the cars may turn off the engine if shaken just the right way...2001: GM detects the defect during pre-production testing of the Saturn Ion.2003: A service technician closes an inquiry into a stalling Saturn Ion after changing the key ring and noticing the problem was fixed.2004: GM recognizes the defect again as the Chevrolet Cobalt replaces the Cavalier.fast forward through the denials, driver deaths, and government bailouts2012: GM identifies four crashes and four corresponding fatalities (all involving 2004 Saturn Ions) along with six other injuries from four other crashes attributable to the defect.Sept. 4, 2012: GM reports August 2012 sales were up 10 percent from the previous year, with Chevrolet passenger car sales up 25 percent.June 2013: A deposition by a Cobalt program engineer says the company made a "business decision not to fix this problem," raising questions of whether GM consciously decided to launch the Cobalt despite knowing of a defect.Dec. 9, 2013: Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announces the government had sold the last of what was previously a 60 percent stake in GM, ending the bailout. The bailout had cost taxpayers $10 billion on a $49.5 billion investment.End of 2013: GM determines that the faulty ignition switch is to blame for at least 31 crashes and 13 deaths.It took over 10 years for GM to admit fault.And all because an engineer decided to trim a pin by tenths of a millimeter, without testing and without getting anyone else's approval.Fast forward to 2026, and the Allison name is no longer affiliated with the transmissions. You do the math.
  • Normie I'd hate to have to actually use that awkwardly mounted spare tire in a roadside fix scenario. Bumper jack? Tote around a 40 lb. floor jack? That's a high ridin' buggy!
Next