Light It Up: Canucks to Mandate Taillight Illumination

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It’s a problem — one I’m sure you’ve witnessed. A hapless driver, plodding along a darkened highway with no taillights illuminated, mistakenly thinking their lights are on thanks to a bright dashboard and flaccid daytime running lights.

High on poutine and maple syrup, Transport Canada is having no more of it, announcing a new mandate requiring all new cars sold in the Great White North to have extra illumination starting in 2021.

The initiative also proves that someone within the Canadian government has a sense of humour, as Transport Canada says they’re going “ghostbusting to target phantom vehicles.” Break out the ECTO-1!

Transport Canada minister Marc Garneau, who has logged 677 hours as a spacefaring astronaut, described vehicles which drive in the dark with no lights on as “phantom vehicles,” a phrase keeping in line with the ghostbusting theme. Posing a safety risk, they are difficult to see in low-light conditions. Given that most of Canada is plunged into wintery darkness for what seems like eleven months of the year, this is not a wholly bad observation.

The safety standard requires all new cars sold in Canada as of 2021 to be more visible in low-light conditions, and will require manufacturers to build vehicles that do one of the following:

  • Have daytime running lights and tail lights come on when the vehicle instrument panel is illuminated and the vehicle is in operation;
  • Automatically turn on the headlights, tail lights, and side marker lights in low-light conditions; or
  • Keep the driver’s instrument panel dark so the driver knows to turn on all the lights.

Some idiots drivers believe an illuminated instrument panel means the headlights and tail lights are already on, which may not be the case. Vehicles imbued with snazzy TFT screens ahead of the driver are often brighter than the sun, leading more than a few bewildered pilots to blithely claw their way along the freeway without giving any thought whatsoever to the status of their outward illumination or their fellow drivers.

“Phantom vehicles have been a nuisance and a safety risk on Canada’s roads for many years and I’m proud our Government is doing something about it. The new measures we’re taking will improve nighttime visibility and safety,” said Mr. Garneau, who is not currently wearing a space suit.

Some may grumble about Daddy Government legislating more equipment installed on our cars but, in this case, I’m okay with it. We’re never going to train all drivers to be as alert as we are. Not everyone is a gearhead (yes, I know that’s hard to believe) and, in fact, I remain convinced that a great cadre of people see the car as nothing more than an appliance to be tolerated. Look at the crowd who want us all in hypoallergenic autonomous pods, fer chrissakes.

Chime in below if you’ve ever encountered one of these mooks who drive without turning on their lights. The best story will be awarded $100 in valuable TTAC Bonus Bucks, which are completely fictional and not valuable at all. Points are doubled if the story includes a reference to ghostbusting.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 99 comments
  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Mar 24, 2018

    My 2007 CTS-V had to have the DRLs activated upon import to Canada. Just the turn signal lights are on during the day, so I won't burn a headlight out from daily use. Pretty SMRT.

  • Delta88 Delta88 on Mar 26, 2018

    VW and Audi figured this out a decade ago. Light sensor in the gauge cluster. When it’s dark and the headlights aren’t on the instrument cluster goes black. I almost always keep mine in the Auto position but a few times I had it in the Off position when pulling into the parking garage at work. Works like a charm, gauges go black so I flip the switch to Auto. I think I see at least one Toyota or Honda running in ghost mode every time I drive at night.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next