Daimler Might Expand Its 'Mobility Services' Through an Unlikely German Ally

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Automotive soothsayers have foreseen the coming Armageddon, where private car ownership vanishes and we’re all ferried around in robotic taxis or rental vehicles, and manufacturers have taken their divinations to heart. Either that, or the opportunity to diversity already successful companies is too tempting a prospect to pass up. As such, we’ve seen “mobility” become the new industry buzzword — used as a fill-in for electric vehicles, autonomous development, and ride-sharing/hailing programs.

Hoping to expand its own mobility services, Daimler has announced an openness to seek broader alliances just days after BMW Group bought out its rental car partner, Sixt, from their joint car-sharing program DriveNow. That sets the stage for a peculiar partnership, as the two German automakers have a long, competitive history with each other — one which sometimes results in passive-aggressive behavior.

That’s not to suggest the two automotive giants are incompatible. Despite some tongue-in-cheek jabs and friendly competition, the pair seem to be able to cooperate with one another. Besides, this is a new era where mobility is everything and you can’t let rivalries stand in the way of progress.

Dieter Zetsche, chief executive for Daimler and Mercedes-Benz, told analysts on Friday that he was willing to combine his company’s mobility services with a rival automaker. “To the extent that it would be more successful in a partnership, we would consider that,” Zetsche clarified.

Daimler has several car-sharing and hailing platforms, including Moovel, MyTaxi, and Car2Go. All of which, Chief financial Officer Bodo Uebber explained, the company is looking to expand upon. “We do not exclude that we go for external funding,” Uebber added.

Moovel is an app Daimler claims is necessary, since transportation is “on the edge of disruption.” It allows customers to book transit passes via phone but also connects them to MyTaxi and Car2Go. While Moovel is currently developing a software toolkit, called RideTrap, which allows users to book everything from train tickets to bicycle rentals, only Car2Go has a physical presence in the United States.

The ride-sharing service is easiest to spot in larger cities, identifiable by the blue and white Smart ForTwos wearing the company’s logo. But the hourly car rental service hasn’t taken off in the states as Daimler would have liked, primarily because the tiny vehicles used in its fleet are less useful outside of densely populated urban areas.

As a result, Car2Go (which functions similarly to ZipCar) decided to expand its footprint and vehicles by gradually replacing the ForTwos with the Mercedes-Benz CLA and GLA. While it might sound like the program is a failure, global membership crept up 30 percent last year, with about a third of its customers coming from North America.

Meanwhile, BMW has DriveNow in Europe and ReachNow in North America. Both companies function similarly to Car2Go, with the main differencing being you’ll have BMW or Mini-branded vehicles on offer. With the two companies now wholly-owned subsidiaries, the German automaker can begin considering a strategic partnership. In fact, that may have been why BMW bought out Sixt in the first place — as Daimler and BMW have been discussing a broader car-sharing and driverless taxi alliance for a while now.

[Source: Reuters] [Images: Daimler AG]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Next