PSA to GM: Pay Up for That Dirty Fleet You Sold Us

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
psa to gm pay up for that dirty fleet you sold us

The handover of General Motors’ money-losing European division to France’s PSA Group seemed complete last July, but now the maker of Peugeot and Citroen cars isn’t happy with the bag it’s holding.

PSA claims the acquisition of the Opel and Vauxhall brands left it on the hook for massive fines, all stemming from looming European emissions regulations and the not-so-squeaky-clean state of its new holdings. The automaker’s now seeking nearly $1 billion from GM — more than half of what it paid for the brands.

Ultra-strict European Union emissions regulations slated to come into effect in 2021 would penalize PSA for its newly acquired fleet, something that apparently wasn’t known at the time of the handover. According to a Reuters report, PSA says the scale of the problem only became clear after it took ownership. Blame a brand with one gee-whiz clean car and a full stable of emissions laggards.

“We became aware a few weeks after we finalised the closing that the company was going to the wall on CO2 emissions,” PSA Group CEO Carlos Tavares told reporters in early November. “If you fail to comply (with EU rules) the weight of fines you are hit with can threaten the company’s existence.”

Tavares said his company immediately set about accelerating product development. The move to switch Opel and Vauxhall products to PSA platforms (with cleaner French engines) was pushed ahead three years. Still, the new breed won’t appear until 2024.

Sources close to the issue tell Reuters that GM underestimated the public’s switch away from diesel-powered cars in its calculations. It also relied heavily on sales of the all-electric Opel Ampera-e (Chevrolet Bolt) to meet its emissions targets. The looming regulation change punishes each car in an automaker’s fleet for every extra gram of carbon dioxide it spews per kilometer, to the tune of $113 per vehicle. A crushing load of fines wouldn’t take long to pile up.

“People who had worked on the closing realised quite quickly that there were these big discrepancies,” one PSA source said. “They had been swept under the rug.”

Another source said that PSA stood to lose over $11,000 for each Ampera-e sold, making the company’s reliance on that one car doubly risky.

“Their technical solution was economically unviable and would have led to enormous losses,” the source told Reuters. “So the first thing you do is drop that (product) line, but then the fleet emissions explode.”

Besides expediting the development of new vehicles, PSA was forced to slap together hybrid variants of several Opel cars. This wasn’t part of the original product plan. Still, the state of Opel’s fleet wasn’t entirely a secret leading up to the sale.

“We’ve been reporting for years that Opel/Vauxhall would have significant problems meeting the CO2 targets as GM brands in Europe,” said Thomas Goettle, head analyst at PA Consulting. The firm published a study detailing Opel and the 2021 emissions regulations in November 2016. “Opel is five to seven years behind with their engine lineup,” he added.

GM spokesman David Caldwell wouldn’t comment on whether the two companies discussed emissions, only stating, “We provided them with substantial information.”

PSA has not yet filed any legal claims against GM.

[Image: General Motors]

Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Dec 02, 2017

    I don't have a dog in this fight, but it will provide some good entertainment going forward. I wonder if any of the parties involved will learn anything constructive this time?

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Dec 27, 2017

    So basically PSA is claiming they're Packard and Opel/Vauxhall is Studebaker?

  • Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
  • Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
  • ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
  • ToolGuy Last picture: Labeling the accelerator as "play" and the brake pedal as "pause" might be cute, but it feels wrong. It feels wrong because it is wrong, and it is wrong because Calculus.Sidebar: I have some in-laws who engage the accelerator and brake on a binary on/off all-in basis. So annoying as a passenger.Drive smoothly out there. 🙂
  • Johnny ringo It's an interesting vehicle, I'd like to see VW offer the two row Buzz in the states also.