Ace of Base: 2018 Subaru Forester 2.5i

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
ace of base 2018 subaru forester 2 5i

At this year’s L.A. Auto Show, Subaru will introduce the Ascent, a seven-passenger crossover that the brand is calling the “biggest yet” and “family-sized.” In a market awash with three-row machines, Subaru is one of the few brands not peddling a vehicle that will seat a shift of hockey players plus their driver.

Until then, let’s toss one of Subaru’s current nameplates, the Forester, under our Ace of Base microscope.

Unless one pops for a 2.0XT model, priced in the thirties, all Forester wagons come with the same engine. A 2.5-liter boxer-four lives between the fenders, making 170 horsepower and rated at 28 mpg on the highway. All-wheel drive is standard, of course, as is a manual transmission.

Gone are the days when Legacy and Outback drivers could row-their-own all the way to their active-lifestyle destination, thanks to aggressive fuel economy regs and a CVT which reliably boosts fuel economy by nearly 14 percent in these vehicles. Fortunately, the Exploding Galaxy has not stripped the Forester of its manual box. This is a large reason why I chose the Forester for today’s Ace of Base and not one of its similarly-sized showroom cousins.

The 2.5i trim, at $22,795, rides on 17-inch steelies providing a not insignificant 8.7 inches of ground clearance. Eagle-eyed shoppers can spot this base model on dealer lots by looking for its black side mirrors and lack of rear spoiler. The 2.5i is also the only Forester not to include a moonroof, but take it from this 6’6” human: it eats into headroom. You don’t need it.

A six-way manually adjustable seat wrapped in cloth greets the driver, along with a sensible dashboard layout and logical analog gauges. Audio controls pepper the tilt/telescope steering wheel, controlling an infotainment system bearing a 6.2-inch screen and rear-facing camera.

Ever the practical one, all Foresters have grocery bag hooks and underfloor storage in the cargo area. A bevy of airbags keep things pillowy in a crash. Discs perform braking duties at all four corners along with the usual suite of traction control assists and dynamic vehicle controls that mete out or rein in power as needed in hair-raising road conditions.

No fewer than seven different paint options are on offer, ranging from the milquetoast grayscale to interesting green, red, and blue. This is pleasing to the discerning Ace of Base customer who desires choice in the hue of their next new car. Infuriatingly, the only way to get a black interior is to spec Crystal Black or Ice Silver exterior paint.

The brand as a whole has never been stronger, now selling triple the number of cars annually it was in 2002. In that year, they sold the Legacy, Impreza, WRX, Outback, and Forester. Today, showrooms are filled with those machines plus the BRZ and Crosstrek. Tripling one’s sales while only adding two models (one of those being low-volume) speaks to the inroads Subaru has made in the minds of American shoppers.

The Forester’s styling doesn’t speak to this author, as I’ve always found it too tall and narrow. That is, of course, strictly subjective. Given the level of standard equipment, and the continued presence of a manual transmission, a base model Forester holds a good bit of appeal for someone seeking a capacious all-wheel drive machine not priced into the stratosphere.

[Image: Subaru]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • John Scott John Scott on Nov 25, 2017

    My 2017 Forester Premium 6MT has been a great car so far. 10K trouble-free miles, average 31MPG to date. I looked for this specific configuration - gets you heated seats, the nice looking alloy wheels, huge sunroof (my 6'3" son could wear anything short of a ten gallon hat so I don't know how you could want much more head room even with the sunroof) and the "traditional" style Subaru all wheel drive. Solid handling, good ride, plenty of room , yeah, more power would be a plus but there's plenty for the way I drive - with four adults aboard there's no worries keeping up with traffic on Ohio interstates. I have a strange amount of affection for my Forester though calling it "love" would be a stretch. So far it's been the most satisfying car for the money I've owned in nearly 40 years of automotive ownership. We'll see how it goes as the miles add up....

  • Turf3 Turf3 on Nov 27, 2017

    Well, we tried a '16 Forester and a '16 Outback, decided to buy the Outback because it's just a little cushier and more car-like, but we both really really liked the way the Forester drove. By the way, mixed driving returns well over 25 mpg and highway over 30 with the Outback which is mechanically identical to the Forester. The EPA mileage ratings are either the best in its class, or the second best. It has been many years since Subaru four wheel drive came with a big fuel mileage penalty. Current data seem to indicate that any reliability issues with earlier models have been addressed (only time will tell whether addressing them has completely eliminated them, or whether there are others). It is not a sports car or sports sedan, and if you drive it like one and expect it to respond like one, you are not using good sense. It is one of the three vehicles of this type you can see out of. The other two are the same year model Outback and the VW Tiguan. I really enjoyed driving the Tiguan but I am more afraid of buying a VW with their reliability record than a Subaru with their reliability record. I will resist buying a car I can't see out of as long as I can. Frankly I don't give a rat's behind what kind of "lesbian crunchy granola flannel wearer" image some people have decided to assign to Subaru. I am too old to care about that. I am male, so clearly not lesbian, I like granola, rarely wear flannel. Also know how to shoot, favorite dog is a poodle, know how to tie a necktie (three different ways), and carry a set of political beliefs that would curl your hair. I do not want to drive a school bus, thus the three row SUVs have zero appeal for me. Not interested in paying for size, weight, and poor fuel economy that I don't need.

  • Ernesto Perez There's a line in the movie Armageddon where Bruce Willis says " is this the best idea NASA came up with?". Don't quote me. I'm asking is this the best idea NY came up with? What's next? Charging pedestrians to walk in certain parts of the city? Every year the price for everything gets more expensive and most of the services we pay for gets worse. Obviously more money is not the solution. What we need are better ideas, strategies and inventions. You want to charge drivers in the city - then put tolls on the free bridges like the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges. There's always a better way or product. It's just the idiots on top think they know best.
  • Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
  • Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
  • FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
  • Tassos A "small car", TIM????????????This is the GLE. Have you even ever SEEN the huge thing at a dealer's??? NOT even the GLC,and Merc has TWO classes even SMALLER than the C (The A and the B, you guessed it? You must be a GENIUS!).THe E is a "MIDSIZED" crossover, NOT A SMALL ONE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, oh CLUELESS one.I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THE NONSENSE you post here every god damned day.And I BET you will never even CORRECT your NONSENSE, much less APOLOGIZE for your cluelessness and unprofessionalism.