Ace of Base: 2018 Subaru Forester 2.5i

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy
ace of base 2018 subaru forester 2 5i

At this year’s L.A. Auto Show, Subaru will introduce the Ascent, a seven-passenger crossover that the brand is calling the “biggest yet” and “family-sized.” In a market awash with three-row machines, Subaru is one of the few brands not peddling a vehicle that will seat a shift of hockey players plus their driver.

Until then, let’s toss one of Subaru’s current nameplates, the Forester, under our Ace of Base microscope.

Unless one pops for a 2.0XT model, priced in the thirties, all Forester wagons come with the same engine. A 2.5-liter boxer-four lives between the fenders, making 170 horsepower and rated at 28 mpg on the highway. All-wheel drive is standard, of course, as is a manual transmission.

Gone are the days when Legacy and Outback drivers could row-their-own all the way to their active-lifestyle destination, thanks to aggressive fuel economy regs and a CVT which reliably boosts fuel economy by nearly 14 percent in these vehicles. Fortunately, the Exploding Galaxy has not stripped the Forester of its manual box. This is a large reason why I chose the Forester for today’s Ace of Base and not one of its similarly-sized showroom cousins.

The 2.5i trim, at $22,795, rides on 17-inch steelies providing a not insignificant 8.7 inches of ground clearance. Eagle-eyed shoppers can spot this base model on dealer lots by looking for its black side mirrors and lack of rear spoiler. The 2.5i is also the only Forester not to include a moonroof, but take it from this 6’6” human: it eats into headroom. You don’t need it.

A six-way manually adjustable seat wrapped in cloth greets the driver, along with a sensible dashboard layout and logical analog gauges. Audio controls pepper the tilt/telescope steering wheel, controlling an infotainment system bearing a 6.2-inch screen and rear-facing camera.

Ever the practical one, all Foresters have grocery bag hooks and underfloor storage in the cargo area. A bevy of airbags keep things pillowy in a crash. Discs perform braking duties at all four corners along with the usual suite of traction control assists and dynamic vehicle controls that mete out or rein in power as needed in hair-raising road conditions.

No fewer than seven different paint options are on offer, ranging from the milquetoast grayscale to interesting green, red, and blue. This is pleasing to the discerning Ace of Base customer who desires choice in the hue of their next new car. Infuriatingly, the only way to get a black interior is to spec Crystal Black or Ice Silver exterior paint.

The brand as a whole has never been stronger, now selling triple the number of cars annually it was in 2002. In that year, they sold the Legacy, Impreza, WRX, Outback, and Forester. Today, showrooms are filled with those machines plus the BRZ and Crosstrek. Tripling one’s sales while only adding two models (one of those being low-volume) speaks to the inroads Subaru has made in the minds of American shoppers.

The Forester’s styling doesn’t speak to this author, as I’ve always found it too tall and narrow. That is, of course, strictly subjective. Given the level of standard equipment, and the continued presence of a manual transmission, a base model Forester holds a good bit of appeal for someone seeking a capacious all-wheel drive machine not priced into the stratosphere.

[Image: Subaru]

Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • John Scott John Scott on Nov 25, 2017

    My 2017 Forester Premium 6MT has been a great car so far. 10K trouble-free miles, average 31MPG to date. I looked for this specific configuration - gets you heated seats, the nice looking alloy wheels, huge sunroof (my 6'3" son could wear anything short of a ten gallon hat so I don't know how you could want much more head room even with the sunroof) and the "traditional" style Subaru all wheel drive. Solid handling, good ride, plenty of room , yeah, more power would be a plus but there's plenty for the way I drive - with four adults aboard there's no worries keeping up with traffic on Ohio interstates. I have a strange amount of affection for my Forester though calling it "love" would be a stretch. So far it's been the most satisfying car for the money I've owned in nearly 40 years of automotive ownership. We'll see how it goes as the miles add up....

  • Turf3 Turf3 on Nov 27, 2017

    Well, we tried a '16 Forester and a '16 Outback, decided to buy the Outback because it's just a little cushier and more car-like, but we both really really liked the way the Forester drove. By the way, mixed driving returns well over 25 mpg and highway over 30 with the Outback which is mechanically identical to the Forester. The EPA mileage ratings are either the best in its class, or the second best. It has been many years since Subaru four wheel drive came with a big fuel mileage penalty. Current data seem to indicate that any reliability issues with earlier models have been addressed (only time will tell whether addressing them has completely eliminated them, or whether there are others). It is not a sports car or sports sedan, and if you drive it like one and expect it to respond like one, you are not using good sense. It is one of the three vehicles of this type you can see out of. The other two are the same year model Outback and the VW Tiguan. I really enjoyed driving the Tiguan but I am more afraid of buying a VW with their reliability record than a Subaru with their reliability record. I will resist buying a car I can't see out of as long as I can. Frankly I don't give a rat's behind what kind of "lesbian crunchy granola flannel wearer" image some people have decided to assign to Subaru. I am too old to care about that. I am male, so clearly not lesbian, I like granola, rarely wear flannel. Also know how to shoot, favorite dog is a poodle, know how to tie a necktie (three different ways), and carry a set of political beliefs that would curl your hair. I do not want to drive a school bus, thus the three row SUVs have zero appeal for me. Not interested in paying for size, weight, and poor fuel economy that I don't need.

  • EBFlex When you support socialism I guess it makes sense to support countries that are socialist.This is absolutely ridiculous though. The dementia-riddled, installed president won't allow drilling here and as recently as early November said "NO MORE DRILLING" ( )Why help people here and give them work when you can ship it off to Venezuela? Next, he will be advocating for giving jobs to China who are continuing to commit crimes against humanity (something the elf Fauci wishes he could do).This is insanity. We have tons of oil here. We should be drilling for it and aggressively building refining capacity to turn it into lovely, lovely gasoline and diesel.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh In the news : Rich people join forces to stay ultra rich and EFF poor people in all countries by dividing them against each other and killing them
  • Kcflyer I'm curious if the elections in Venezuela take as long to call as the one's in the U.S. ? Too bad we don't have hundreds of years supply of petro right here in U.S. sigh.
  • SCE to AUX "had far more to do with working with Venezuela to ensure freer elections and more international cooperation than expanding anyone’s oil supply"That's double BS - no oil purchase will clean up Venezuela's corruption, and of course the administration wants to see lower gas prices.The US chooses its friends poorly, and this is the latest example.
  • Jkross22 Aren't toy cars by definition those with 2 seats?