Despite Falsified Supplier Data, Japanese Automakers Claim Cars Are Safe

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Kobe Steel, the disgraced Japanese metal supplier, apparently falsified quality data for its products for over 10 years, the company now admits. Some of those products were sheetmetal and aluminum components used by a slew of automakers, among them American, Japanese, French, German, and Swedish manufacturers.

Makers of trains and airliners also made use of the metals, the strength and durability of which is now in doubt. This week, the European Aviation Safety Agency warned against components made by Kobe Steel.

While Boeing and Airbus inspect their aircraft, automakers are doing the same. Ford has said there’s no reason to be concerned, as Kobe product only went into the hood of a Chinese-market sedan. Now, four other automakers have given their vehicles a clean bill of health.

According to Reuters, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Mazda — four of the five Japanese automakers to use Kobe parts in hoods and other exterior components — says tests show the parts are safe. Mitsubishi hasn’t yet issued an all-safe message.

In a statement, Toyota said, “We confirmed that the materials satisfy applicable statutory standards, and our own internal standard, for key safety and durability requirements for vehicles.”

Other automakers impacted by the scandal include General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, Tesla, Volvo, and Hyundai. While Japanese automaker seem okay with what Kobe shipped to their factories, the industry as a whole wonders how it can trust the supplier. In total, 500 companies use Kobe components and materials.

“For a manufacturer, quality control is the most important thing and they were cheating for many years,” one senior industry executive told Reuters. “This was a shock to their customers, who can no longer trust Kobe Steel.”

Kobe’s CEO claims he wants to make right with the industry, starting with discovering how the culture of falsifying quality reports began and spread. Once that’s wrapped up, and all parts identified and inspected, Hiroya Kawasaki says he will resign. Meanwhile, the supplier is bracing for lawsuits even as the company’s stock takes a Volkswagen-like nosedive.

[Image: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Fred Fred on Oct 20, 2017

    The real problem will be when these cars get into a wreck, some lawyer is going to find some expert and they will then sue everyone with the slightest connection.

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Oct 20, 2017

    Yup, no doubt about it, hoods and trunklids are dangerous when made of Kobe aluminum. And none of the companies buying affected metals have an incoming inspection program or process controls any more. That's so '90s. Of course, there's the matter of making airliner wings out of the out-of-spec stuff. Again, it strains my credulity that companies routinely accept materials with no internal quality assurance inspections. Nissan is supposed to train inspectors for two months to fill in forms that certify a car meets Type Specifications, like having four wheels. They cheated by using inspectors with only 6 weeks training. Mitsubishi Motors is the real bad guy. A scandal in 2001, another one in 2011 on fuel economy falsifications, whereupon much ritual bowing assured authorities it wouldn't happen again. Until 2016, when they were at it again. Still, look on the bright side - now Nissan has semi-bought them out, they can have a fresh look at their own inspection program. Nissan is shutting down for two weeks in Japan on home-market cars while inspectors are trained. Apparently they're getting on-the-job training certifying export cars in the meantime, reading between the lines. https://dailykanban.com/2017/10/nissan-brouhaha-premature-inspectors-cause-shutdown/

  • Buickman if they name it "Recall" there will already be Brand Awareness!
  • 1995 SC I wish they'd give us a non turbo version of this motor in a more basic package. Inline Sixes in trucks = Good. Turbos that give me gobs of power that I don't need, extra complexity and swill fuel = Bad.What I need is an LV1 (4.3 LT based V6) in a Colorado.
  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
Next