Brexit Seems to Have Really Screwed Up Britain's Car Market

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While some of Europe saw modest auto sale gains through the first nine months of 2017, the region has mirrored North America’s decline in deliveries since the end of the summer. The United States saw eight consecutive months of declining sales this year, with a positive bump in September and better than expected volume in Canada.

Europe, meanwhile, saw the inverse. Passenger car registrations fell 2 percent year-over-year to roughly 1.43 million deliveries in September, despite August seeing a 5.6-percent improvement. Overall, 2017 has the makings of a unsatisfactory sales year for both regions. But Europe seemed to be doing alright before the U.K. suddenly stopped buying cars.

British registrations took a massive nosedive after Brexit. By September, it represented a monthly decline of 9.3 percent, compared to Germany’s 3.3 percent slide. Even though the rest of the continent saw a gain in sales, having Europe’s two largest markets lagging guaranteed the net loss.

The U.K.’s decline represent sixth straight months of dwindling deliveries. Bloomberg attributes the fumble to a weak pound and unsuccessful Brexit negotiations. In fact, trade deals have been idled since the British Chambers of Commerce downgraded its medium-term economic growth outlook in early September.

Still, we shouldn’t attribute Britain’s lackluster sales performance entirely to Brexit. Shorter average commuter times within the United Kingdom have made ride-hailing apps like Uber and Lyft exceedingly popular. The relatively recent PCP car loan trend also appears to have plateaued and analysts are becoming fearful that it has created a dangerous bubble within the automotive industry — akin to what took place in the housing market during the Great Recession. British household indebtedness is also already extremely high and average household savings is virtually nonexistent.

Combine that with governmental promises that internal combustion vehicles will be banned by 2040, fairly high auto taxation rates (compared to the U.S.), a market hampered by right-hand drive models that cannot be sold in other parts of Europe while also leaving consumers with fewer options, and the United Kingdom doesn’t really look like the greatest place to own a car.

While other countries have promised similar regulatory measures and already implement fairly aggressive taxes on automobile ownership, the U.K. seems to be the one suffering the most. As a result, PSA Group said on Monday it has decided to eliminate 400 jobs at Vauxhall’s Ellesmere Port facility in Britain to cope with declining sales.

Of course, Vauxhall has problems that extend beyond the U.K. But the region’s sales slump is hurting other automakers popular among British consumers. New vehicle deliveries from Ford Motor Co., the U.K.’s best-selling brand, fell 13 points across Europe last month.

For the whole of the year, U.K. sales down 3.9 percent against 2016’s figures through September. The most noticeable gap comes from diesel sales. According to SMMT vehicle registration data, diesel-powered vehicles saw 21.7 percent fewer deliveries in September and a 13.7-point loss for the year so far.

No other segment has bothered to fill that void. Sales for all vehicle types are down within Britain this year. The only exception is alternative fuel vehicles — which saw massive gains in 2017. Sadly, that 4.6-percent market share isn’t growing fast enough patch the gaping hole left by internal combustion models.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Since adding automotive writing to his repertoire, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, discussed the status of the automotive sector on national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone should ever have to. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. Alleged to be contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 31 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Oct 17, 2017

    Brexit. The worse populist decision by any politican this Century. Putting aside, stagnant incomes, mixed with a depreciating currency, along with the expected inflationary pressures, the UK's auto manufacturer's are facing a declining export market. The EU is the UK's biggest market by far and it will shrink substantially. This doesn't factor in the declining financial sector that will move offshore. The Brexit supporters deserve ehat's coming yheir way, just like the supporters of the dismantling of NAFTA.

    • See 7 previous
    • TW5 TW5 on Oct 19, 2017

      @ Big Al from Oz I didn't claim that the EU was the downfall of the UK's global preeminence. I argued that joining the EU was the end of UK attempts to economically distinguish themselves on the continent or on the globe. It was a poor decision based upon faulty economics and unfounded fears of absolute trade advantage in the US, Canada, and Australia. Since joining the EU they've lost industry and natural resource production, and, if they had chosen Bremain, the EU would have eventually eliminated the pound. This would have limited the UK's ability to affect monetary policy, and it would have consolidated control in Brussels. Look at the UK's median income performance. It's subpar. The US, Canada, and Australia have all basically risen to the same plateau by leveraging our resources and trading among ourselves and with Asia. Our median income is over $10,000 more on a PPP basis than the UK. I don't want to disparage the UK, but they took a vow of poverty when they signed the Faustian deal with the EU. If they had maintained the old trading relationships, regardless of the unilateral termination of Bretton Woods by the US, the UK would be considerably more wealthy today.

  • Roberto Esponja Roberto Esponja on Oct 18, 2017

    "a market hampered by right-hand drive models that cannot be sold in other parts of Europe while also leaving consumers with fewer options" I truly can't comprehend why there are still countries that stick to driving on the left. Back in the 1960's-70's when several countries switched to driving on the right, ALL of them should have done so. Right-hand-drive is unnatural. I realize this opinion is going to stir up a lot of hate from those who think driving on the left is better. So be it...

    • See 1 previous
    • Flyf2d Flyf2d on Oct 18, 2017

      Most people are right handed, therefore stronger and more dexterous* with their right. If you're doing something varied requiring accuracy like I dunno, steering and something needing repetitive less accuracy like gear changing , doesn't a right left split make sense ? Hence right hand drive makes sense. Immaterial now that everyone has a slush box transmission and uses the right hand only for their phones. *Yes, I know Dexter means right

  • MaintenanceCosts We need a $15k EV, probably a tall hatch, that satisfies US safety standards with reasonable comfort and durability and a warranty. That would actually be affordable to the median wage earner.
  • Calrson Fan I'll take a simple over cheap. Although that should equate to cheap or at least cheaper. I'm so over all the useless & intrusive tech. common in today's cars & trucks. Which is why I drive older stuff. We need more vehicles geared towards simplicity and longevity, like the Slate. if that ever makes it to market. As I once heard on American Hot Rod, less is more. Isn't that the truth!
  • 28-Cars-Later Maybe it will eventually change but as of right now even if you spend the money to build these stations everywhere, if the electricity sold is 100%+ of what its sold for in residential rates it will never take off. To a degree a convenience charge amount (of not 100%) could fly but smart owners will understand the trade off and limit their use of it. Those without home charging capabilities simply won't continue to pay through the nose on electricity - a utility of which has skyrocketed even wholesale and I suspect will continue to do so.
  • KOKing Need and want are definitely different, especially today. Not only are relative expectations different from 40-50yrs ago, but used cars' value/features/quality probably make them more attractive options than a couple generations ago. I suspect for the same $21k as a Hyundai Venue, a lot of people would choose a ~5yr old Ford Explorer instead. Today's gas prices might make some think twice, but a lot of the same people probably won't think as far as repair costs.I think something interesting to look at in other global markets where historically cheap, small cars continue to be available, where cheap Chinese cars are becoming available, whether the latter end up quickly displacing the former in the low-cost segment long-term (I suspect yes).
  • Lorenzo What the American market needs is a 1997 Honda Civic EX in coupe or sedan form, fully loaded like in 1997 at 1997 prices ($19K) or a slightly bigger 1997 Nissan Altima GXE sedan with the larger 2.4L engine and reliable Jatco automatic for about the same price. I have owned both, and wish I had either one back so I could get rid of the keyless Cr**p, the drive-by-wire, and the touch screen, and operate the car myself with buttons and knobs..
Next