2017 Toyota Prius Prime Advanced Review - All Charged Up

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2017 Toyota Prius Prime Advance

1.8-liter inline-four, DOHC, with plug-in hybrid electric motor (121 combined horsepower)
Continuously-variable transmission, front-wheel drive
55 city / 53 highway / 54 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
133 (EPA Rating, MPGe)
64.2 (As Tested, MPG)
Base Price: $33,985 (U.S.)
As Tested: $35,112 (U.S.)
Prices include $885 freight charge.

Like it or not, bias is always going to be a concern whenever consuming any sort of media. Efforts can be made to present fair and balanced reporting on any issue, but the problem is, quite simply, that news organizations are made up of people who hold their own opinions. The best way the reader/listener/viewer can navigate the bias is to know what those biases are, and account for them.

Let me be clear – I’m biased against the Prius. Nearly two decades of negative reinforcement about the Prius and Prius drivers have hardened a dislike of the little wedge that promises nothing but slow driving in the left lane. Minimal performance and a focus on fuel economy above nearly all else is foreign to those of us who truly enjoy driving.

Thus, I dreaded the arrival of this 2017 Toyota Prius Prime to my driveway, worrying that I might doze off from sheer boredom during my commute. When I saw the white paint applied to the vehicle’s sharply-angled flanks, I was further concerned about the appliance-like nature of this plug-in people hauler.

It’s certainly not shaped like a Maytag washer. Toyota’s familiar long, low hatchback shape has been iterated through the generations, but this is still clearly a Prius. From the lines of the windowsills and side moldings that parallel themselves gently upward from front to rear, to the sharply cut-off tail, Toyota could easily credit Bernoulli and Kamm as co-designers of the Prius.

I won’t pretend to know the finer points of aerodynamic theory, but I believe the deep valley found in the rear window glass must make a significant impact on drag. Otherwise, that funky contour is simply form leading function – there seems to be no good way to wipe that quite-close-to-horizontal glass surface clear while driving. It was an annoyance with morning dew and mild rains, and I can’t imagine the annoyance when the snows come.

Inside, Toyota stays true to form with the Prius Prime dashboard, combining the main gauges in a wide, central-mounted display, with another 11.6-inch touchscreen handling basically every audio and HVAC function.

The big screen is flanked by volume and temperature buttons that give no tactile feedback when pressed – I’d rather have knobs for functions so frequently accessed while driving – but the screen itself is remarkably bright and clear. Due to its size, multiple functions can share the screen at once. A map can be shown all while monitoring the charge status and performance of the plug-in hybrid system.

The vinyl seating surface – Toyota calls it “Softex” in a clear homage to the MB-Tex found for ages in Mercedes-Benz vehicles – is reasonably comfortable, but is by no means a convincing leather substitute. While normally I’d consider that a problem, in the case of the Prius that may be a feature rather than a bug. Consider that a significant proportion of hybrid buyers are likely to be eco-conscious. I have to imagine that a material that too closely emulates an animal product might be prove very desirable to those buyers.

Driving the Prius Prime reveals a few significant differences even from a traditional hybrid. Since the plug-in hybrid system gives the car a larger battery (which does affect trunk space – Toyota quotes 19.8 cubic feet in the cargo hold, versus 24.6 cubes in a standard Prius), one can spend much more time driving in full EV mode – even up to and exceeding typical highway speeds.

After a full overnight charge, the Prius Prime indicated 27.7 miles of EV range. My typical commute is right around eight miles, so there were several days where I didn’t use a drop of gas. Yeah, I burned some extra natural gas and coal when I plugged into the wall of my garage, but that’s another story.

I don’t love the location of the charging port – where most electric vehicles I’ve experienced have a port on a front fender, the Prius Prime has the plug on the right rear quarter panel, symmetrically opposite the fuel filler. Since I park in my driveway, I needed to back the Prius up close to the house to plug in. It’s likely not an issue for most buyers, but it’s something to consider.

After a week of commuting and kid-hauling, this Prius Prime averaged 64.2 mpg. That number is beyond stunning, especially considering that our current fleet struggles to reach 20 mpg on a good day. I found myself idly spreadsheeting a break-even point of fuel cost versus miles driven versus purchase price for my wife’s next car.

Yes, I’m the geek who plays with Excel when bored.

Regarding driving manners, the braking is still typical of a hybrid. There is a transition between regenerative braking and traditional friction braking that can be a bit indecisive – it can feel jerky when gradually slowing to a stop. As I spent more time with the Prius Prime, it wasn’t as noticeable. It takes getting used to.

The low rolling-resistance tires do project a good bit of tire noise into the cabin, but it’s mostly canceled by the minimal noise from the electric drivetrain. Even when the petrol engine kicks in, the sound is well muted. Driving manners are quite good for a small car, and I found that longish highway drives were relaxed – aided by the lane departure warning, steering assist, and radar cruise control found on this Advanced trim package. It’s not autonomous, but the Prius Prime does a nice job taking some of the drudgery of a long drive away from the driver.

I mentioned Prius drivers earlier, and I must apologize for the generalization. I do have friends that own various prior generations of this iconic hybrid, and as I tend to steer most conversations around to cars eventually, discussions veered toward this Prius.

Several of these friends told me the only way they found driving the Prius bearable was to keep the car in “sport” mode, which sharpens throttle response at the expense of fuel economy. In driving non-Prime versions in the past, I agree that the car does feel less lethargic when driven in “sport” mode.

In the Prius Prime, such sport-mode shenanigans are no longer necessary. The electric motor is backed by the larger battery, so the instant electric torque seems to be more responsive to the right foot. The only time I wished for more power was during an interstate drive when the battery was depleted and I needed to accelerate briskly to pass. The gas engine is taxed in those situations.

Like I mentioned above, I really wanted to hate this Toyota Prius Prime. It represents all that driving enthusiasts despise. But damned if it doesn’t work so well for what it is – an appliance for getting people places efficiently. It affords nearly all the advantages of a pure electric vehicle with the ability to cross the country using traditional gas-centric infrastructure, rather than planning stops around chargers. If it meant I could drive a gas-guzzling sports car on the weekends, I’d happily drive the Prius Prime the rest of the week.

[Images: © 2017 Chris Tonn/The Truth About Cars]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next