Vellum Venom Vignette: Pointless Bumpers, Sacrificial Body Parts

by Sajeev Mehta

Updated: October 16th, 2019 Published: September 8th, 2017

vellum venom vignette pointless bumpers sacrificial body parts

Dan writes:

Hey Sajeev,

Perhaps you or doppleganger Sanjeev have an answer for this. Why are a lot of SUV/Crossovers these days ending up with cut lines along the lower third of their liftgates?

This is showing up on the Ford Escape, 2012-2016 Honda CR-V, Hyundai/Kia crossovers, and maybe some others I can’t remember. Is there a removable panel here, or what? I’ve noticed that this has disappeared in the 2017 CR-V’s redesign, but there’s still plenty of brand new CUVs that have this design feature.

Sajeev answers:

Son, let me tell you something: that Sanjeev’s overhyped like a pumpkin spice latte, with an even worse flavor profile!

To your query: for years we’ve known SUVs are faux tough, and that rear CUV bumpers do the insurance industry no favors. Today’s crop of flat-faced intermediaries are a joke, compared to Thursday’s Vellum Venom design analysis of some monumental bumpers. Proof of such inadequacy lies (so to speak) in the flat posterior below.I reckon that, as the modern minivan’s biggest sales threat, most (all?) CUV tailgates went downtown for extra practicality. Thus their bumpers — in an unorthodox gentrification metaphor — took the hint, moving to less valuable real estate. Sacrificial body parts entered the scene, offering some protection after the land grab: behold Ford Escape part number CJ5Z78423A42APTM.

It’s sad, but logical and expected. No automaker wants to cram another minivan down our collective SUV-loving throats, and their CUVs must meet the ~~public safety~~ collision repair concerns of the insurance companies.

Regarding the 2017 CR-V’s one-piece tailgate, this eBay auction suggests Honda told the insurance industry to go pound sand. Photos of the damage suggest the eBay tailgate coulda been saved had a sacrificial body part been implemented. Better have full coverage on one of them!

[Image: Honda/OP]

#Bumper #Collision #CollisionRepair #Crossover #Cuv #RearBumper #SacrificialBodyPanels #SacrificialBodyParts #SUV #Tailgate #VellumVenom

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 47 comments

Mike N. on Sep 09, 2017

Always wondered why some crossovers have that faux split tailgate look. Speaking of, I find the split tailgate on my X5 very useful. Kinda surprised they're not more common (only available on X5s, Volvo XC90s, and Range Rovers far as I know).

Like Reply
Speedlaw on Feb 25, 2018

I recall that the BMW e46, with the hood/front grille integrated (and a pretty stamping) was changed in the e9X series, because it was too easy to need a new hood when there was a front fenderbender....that cut line was a definite step backwards, but again, most things BMW has done past the e46 have been a step backwards...

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Spamvw Seeing the gear indicator made me wonder when PRNDL was mandated.Anyone?Anyone?1971