Talking With Lights: Ford Disguises Driver As a Seat to Scrutinize a Confused Public

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
talking with lights ford disguises driver as a seat to scrutinize a confused public

Ford Motor Company has been funding research at Virginia Tech that takes an interesting approach to autonomous vehicle development. In early August, a reporter for an NBC affiliate in Washington D.C. filmed a video of a Ford Transit being driven by a man dressed up as the front seat of a car. Initially, it seemed like a strange campus prank. But it was later discovered that Virginia Tech’s Transportation Institute was doing research on how people would respond to a self-driving vehicle.

Apparently, they’ll approach it with a camera — even if it’s in the middle of the street or flying down the highway.

Ford later released a series of hysterical images featuring the man climbing into the false seat costume, announcing that it was researching reactions to the light bar stretched across van’s windshield. The lights are intended to replace cues like hand waves or head nods between drivers and pedestrians.

Presently, drivers have the ability to motion their hand at pedestrians, indication that it’s safe for them to walk. This author takes things a step further by mouthing easy to understand phrases like, “Fear not, I have decided to spare your life and will not crush you beneath my mighty wheels if you pass” as I ambulate my fingers in a walking motion and nod my head in a slow, deliberate fashion. It usually gets the point across, but it’s nice to know Ford can save me the trouble with a bunch of blinking lights.

So far, Ford has come up with a simple set of animations. When the lights are flashing quickly, it’s an announcement that the van is about to accelerate away from a stop. A slower, sweeping pulse is used to indicate that the car is yielding to other traffic (be it foot or street). The default is a solid white stripe that’s used whenever the car is operating autonomously.

Ford says it chose a set of white lights because the usage of colored lights is regulated differently in different parts of the world (and even different parts of the country). It also decided against text because not everyone speaks the same language. While that sounds like a fine idea on paper, the end result is something new that has to be learned by pedestrians and standardized in order to be effective. Nobody has any clue as to how to properly interpret those symbols just yet. Even the aliens in Close Encounters of the Third Kind needed a moment to piece it all together, and they were of a superior intelligence.

“Preparing for a self-driving future is going to take all of us working together,” said John Shutko, Ford’s human factors technical specialist. “That’s why we’re developing and advocating for a standard solution so it can be adopted by the industry and applied to all self-driving vehicles.”

It’s worth pondering if this sort of feature is useful. For autonomous vehicles to work, they’ll have to be extremely defensive drivers. So defensive that you’ll likely be able to bully them into submission if you’re interested in that kind of thing. So why would it even need a system to convey its intentions if it’s already assumed it will always yield to pedestrians? The concept is not without merit but the design itself seems superfluous.

Even if it turns out to be a dead end, it’s still an avenue worth looking down. I’ve slighted several of Ford’s recent mobility projects but it’s good to see the company’s spitballing. Gauging public response to autonomous vehicles is something other manufacturers aren’t really spending time on. While General Motors is already selling Cadillacs equipped with the very impressive Super Cruise system, I can’t recall a single instance where it (or any other automaker) did this type of bizarre market research.

The institute says it has already clocked more than 150 hours of data over approximately 1,800 miles in the Transit van. “This work is of value not only to vehicle users and manufacturers, but also to anyone who walks, rides or drives alongside autonomous vehicles in the future,” said Andy Schaudt, project director, Center for Automated Vehicle Systems, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. “We are proud to support Ford in developing this important research.”

We know Ford is serious about self-driving vehicles. It did pour $1 billion into an artificial intelligence firm and has been testing LIDAR-equipped cars aggressively for at least as long as any other automaker. But the company has also said it’s not interested in rolling out anything with less than level 4 autonomy.

Instead, it’s spending time and energy on market research the other manufactures seem to be neglecting. That doesn’t make a college student masquerading as a car seat not funny, because it assuredly is. It also doesn’t make the faux autonomous testing at Virginia Tech groundbreaking. However, if Ford gleams just one tidbit of information from the experience, that’s still enough to potentially give it an edge over its competition.

Ford plans to have a fully self-driving commercial vehicle on the road by 2021.

Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Sep 14, 2017

    Reminds me of those YouTube videos from a couple years back, with the guy ("MagicOfRahat") going through fast food drive-thrus, pranking the employees. In one, he dressed up as a seat.

  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Sep 15, 2017

    Why don't they just use a matrix of LED lights so they can animate the walk signal or the vehicle starting to move?

  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Ed That has to be a joke.
  • SCE to AUX One data point: my rental '23 Model 3 had good build quality, but still not as good as my Hyundais.Test mule aside, perhaps the build quality of the CT will be good in 2027.