Rare Rides: Presenting Your Majesty, the 1966 Prince R380

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

This special racing edition of Rare Rides was made possible by the Infiniti Q50 First Drive event in Nashville, Tennessee, which also provided the source material for this Q50 review and this Q60 Picture Time. Our Rare Ride today also happens to be my 100th contribution to TTAC. Time flies!

Let’s have a little look at some Japanese racing royalty, starting with some history.

The Prince Motor Company was a short-lived Japanese manufacturer, producing cars from 1954 until its merger with Nissan in 1966. The company began life as an airplane manufacturer in World War II: the Takichawa Aircraft Company.

Specializing in luxury cars, Prince founded the Skyline and Gloria lines. Two more lasting nameplates, the Homy van and the Laurel sedan, were Prince designs that went into the Nissan merger unfinished and came out the other side as Nissan vehicles. Filtered down through the years, the Nissan Gloria would arrive in North America as the original Infiniti M (eventually the Q70), and the Skyline as the Infiniti G (eventually Q50/Q60).

This R380 was the first (and only) attempt by Prince to create a purpose-built race car. Development started after modified Prince Skyline models were defeated by mid-engine Porsche 904s at the 1964 Japanese Grand Prix.

Under the rear hatch lies a 2.0-liter inline-six engine. The engine used here was the same as in Skyline production models, but reworked to produce a whopping 200 horsepower for race duty. The modified Skyline engine mated to a British Hewland five-speed manual transmission. Hewland is still in business, making transmissions for race series today.

Production of the R380 would take place between 1965 and 1968. Unfortunately for Prince, the first year of production netted only disappointment — the Japanese Grand Prix was cancelled for 1965. Instead of racing, Prince used the R380’s downtime to test high-speed aerodynamics and break some speed records.

The Japanese Grand Prix returned in 1966, and Prince was ready with four R380 examples. Those cars captured first and second place, besting even the newly designed trio of Porsche 906 models.

Nissan took over Prince that same year, and for 1967 reworked the car into the R380-II. But these revisions were not enough to overcome advances made by Porsche that year, and Nissan placed second, third, fourth, and sixth place. Porsche won by a margin of two full minutes.

Nissan continued on to make several racing successors through 1980, all traced back to this original Prince R380. Some Prince structure and influence remained in place at Nissan for several years, as well. In the Japanese market, Nissan maintained a dealership line called the Nissan Prince Store. The line was eventually consolidated into Nissan Blue Stage, though not until 1999.

So long, Prince.

[Images © Corey Lewis/The Truth About Cars]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • I saw this at Amelia Island Concours in March. Nice. and Loud. And an acquaintance here near Muncie, Indiana Gary Bartlett could see his car's TWIN... google Bartlett GT40. I thought it WAS Gary's GT40 for a moment. But alas he brought an Eleanor Stang this year. I have video of this Prince. It's pretty nice.

  • Ok, I uploaded my personally taken video of this car passing by me at Amelia Island. https://vid.me/BrlvX

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next