By on August 31, 2017

kia logo emblem

Seoul Central District Court ruled against Kia Motors on Thursday, ordering the automaker to pay around 420 billion won, or $374 million, in unpaid wages. Kia employees first filed an initial lawsuit in 2011, claiming a 659 billion won wage disparity, following it up with an additional suit in 2014.

However, the automaker claims the final cost will be closer to 1 trillion won, or about $890 million, and could result in a third-quarter operating loss. Interestingly, this is roughly the same amount workers demanded over their six-year legal dispute (after interest).

“The current operational situation is such that the ruling amount is [difficult] to bear,” Kia said in a statement.

Kia will appeal the court decision at the earliest possible date.

According to Reuters, labor representatives claim the court vindicated the protesting workforce after Kia attempted to frame them as greedy troublemakers attempting to cripple Korea’s automotive industry.

“The ruling today confirmed that … the union can aid the company’s development,” a spokesperson for the workers’ union told reporters.

The workers say regular bonuses should be included as part of a base pay used to calculate overtime, compensation for unused annual leave, severance pay, and other payments.

Executives at Kia — and by extension, Hyundai Motor Group — are concerned that the court’s ruling could result in negative implications if it sparks other wage claims within the industry. “As a company which outputs more than one-third of [its] local production, Kia Motors’ wage conditions and operational crisis will spread to other automakers and suppliers, adding more pressure to the crisis in South Korea’s auto industry,” the automaker said in a statement.

Second-quarter operating profits dipped 48 percent from last year, but analysts were expecting Kia Motors to bounce back somewhat in the third quarter — despite a fairly grim financial outlook at the start of the year. The automaker is less convinced this will be the case after the court ruling. Company shares fell 3.5 percent after news broke, while Hyundai’s share price fell by 1.8 percent.

Recent political tensions between South Korea and China have also hurt the Pacific automotive industry. China has enacted numerous boycotts on goods coming from the country after South Korea’s decision to deploy a U.S. missile defense system to protect itself from a potential nuclear strike from North Korea.

Hyundai Motor Group, which includes Kia, saw Chinese sales fall by 64 percent between April and July.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

14 Comments on “The South Korean Curse: Kia Loses Landmark Wage Dispute With Employees...”

  • avatar

    Due to this ruling – More Kia production in ‘Merica?

  • avatar

    “China has enacted numerous boycotts on goods coming from the country after South Korea’s decision to deploy a U.S. missile defense system to protect itself from a potential nuclear strike from North Korea.”

    Seriously, F China for this. “Oh, you’ve got an objective psycho with nuclear weapons just 50 miles from your largest city? And the US wants to give you some hope of deterrence? BOYCOTT!”

    Say whatever you want about allies vs puppets in world politics, but this is pretty sad.

    • 0 avatar

      I boycott Chinese products as much as possible anyway. But dude, you have to admit. In military strategy language, our missiles next to potential enemy borders only lead to arms race.

    • 0 avatar

      You do understand that the defense system can actually HIT their capital, right? I don’t endorse the boycott but that’s not much different from US embargoing Cuba because they are close to home and was a Soviet friend / puppet.

  • avatar

    “The workers say regular bonuses should be included as part of a base pay ”

    dictatorship of proletariat – where did I hear that before?

  • avatar

    Hoping Kia will pull through in the near future. They are making really good products the last 5 years it so. Absolutely enjoying my 2014 Forte EX. Very good quality and performance to match and super spacious for us taller folk in front and rear seats.

    • 0 avatar

      Korean business quite a bit more corrupt than people claim US businesses to be. Why would you want companies like that to succeed?

    • 0 avatar

      They will, what’s a billion dollars in retro pay when you divide the cost over say 10 model years (about 34 bucks if they can keep production over 3 million vehicles a year).

      Like Sergio said awhile back, they just pass this stuff on to the end purchaser.

      Nobody would even notice if Kia added 100 dollars to the price of a vehicle to cover this or even if they wanted to pay it up in a year at over 300 bucks a vehicle.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Detroit-X: +1
  • Detroit-X: I had #8 in black. I Hated it. Like you said: you have to wipe the dumb thing before you stand it up,...
  • Da Coyote: Traded in my not to end of warranty E a few years back due to almost daily electrical problems....
  • speedlaw: Definitely this. When I bought my C43, I was making sure I got all the top shelf benz parts/switches, etc....
  • SoCalMikester: they shared a mexican assembly line with nissan

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber