Fiat Chrysler Files 'Angel' Trademark for Passenger Vehicles

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to trademark the term “Angel.” Submitted on July 17th, the name would be applicable to FCA-branded vehicles, specifically passenger automobiles, their structural parts, badges, and trim.

Is this to be a special edition Dodge SRT Demon emblazoned with blinding white bodywork or a electric economy car named to poke fun at the beastly coupe? Either way, FCA could certainly use something angelic in its lineup, because the heavenly Pacifica can’t be left to do all the heavy lifting.

Spotted by Allpar, the trademark filing eludes specifically to a vehicle’s name. But, as it offers no additional details, FCA’s intent is left entirely to our imaginations. My best guess is it will find a home on a concept vehicle we’ll see once in public before FCA places it in storage, but I’m hoping I’m wrong on this one. With AMC long dead, Dodge may be the only brand left that could get away with naming a production vehicle “Angel.”

However, the name could just as easily be reserved for any of Fiat Chrysler’s other brands. It’s incredibly difficult to imagine what the Jeep Angel might look like. Perhaps it will be a high-strung hybrid — CEO Sergio Marchionne said the company will electrify roughly half of its fleet by 2022 and Dodge has to get around to EVs eventually.

There’s also a fair chance the trademark will never be used on anything. Automakers frequently scoop up names as a precautionary measure. Maybe someone at FCA went on a Friday bender, drunkenly suggested there should be a Dodge Angel, and an employee took them seriously enough to issue a filing.

Until the manufacturer lets something slip or the Patent and Trademark Office is forced to abandon the claim due to non-use, all we can do is speculate and make giant leaps based off what we know.

Successor to the Dodge Tomahawk? Plug-in Ram ProMaster with a built in cathedral? The possibilities are as endless as they are stupid. You tell us what you’d like to see.

[Image: FCA]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Since adding automotive writing to his repertoire, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, discussed the status of the automotive sector on national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone should ever have to. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. Alleged to be contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • FOG FOG on Aug 04, 2017

    "Spotted by Allpar, the trademark filing eludes specifically to a vehicle’s name." Will we ever know the vehicle's name or will it "elude" us all forever? Maybe they can "allude" to the name at a later point in time.

  • Garrett Garrett on Aug 04, 2017

    Challenger with a 2.0 liter turbocharged four cylinder.

  • MaintenanceCosts We need a $15k EV, probably a tall hatch, that satisfies US safety standards with reasonable comfort and durability and a warranty. That would actually be affordable to the median wage earner.
  • Calrson Fan I'll take a simple over cheap. Although that should equate to cheap or at least cheaper. I'm so over all the useless & intrusive tech. common in today's cars & trucks. Which is why I drive older stuff. We need more vehicles geared towards simplicity and longevity, like the Slate. if that ever makes it to market. As I once heard on American Hot Rod, less is more. Isn't that the truth!
  • 28-Cars-Later Maybe it will eventually change but as of right now even if you spend the money to build these stations everywhere, if the electricity sold is 100%+ of what its sold for in residential rates it will never take off. To a degree a convenience charge amount (of not 100%) could fly but smart owners will understand the trade off and limit their use of it. Those without home charging capabilities simply won't continue to pay through the nose on electricity - a utility of which has skyrocketed even wholesale and I suspect will continue to do so.
  • KOKing Need and want are definitely different, especially today. Not only are relative expectations different from 40-50yrs ago, but used cars' value/features/quality probably make them more attractive options than a couple generations ago. I suspect for the same $21k as a Hyundai Venue, a lot of people would choose a ~5yr old Ford Explorer instead. Today's gas prices might make some think twice, but a lot of the same people probably won't think as far as repair costs.I think something interesting to look at in other global markets where historically cheap, small cars continue to be available, where cheap Chinese cars are becoming available, whether the latter end up quickly displacing the former in the low-cost segment long-term (I suspect yes).
  • Lorenzo What the American market needs is a 1997 Honda Civic EX in coupe or sedan form, fully loaded like in 1997 at 1997 prices ($19K) or a slightly bigger 1997 Nissan Altima GXE sedan with the larger 2.4L engine and reliable Jatco automatic for about the same price. I have owned both, and wish I had either one back so I could get rid of the keyless Cr**p, the drive-by-wire, and the touch screen, and operate the car myself with buttons and knobs..
Next