QOTD: What's Your Favorite Ride With Odd Windshield Wipers?

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Look, with the best word in the world, we’re all pretty odd around here. Writers, readers, editors (past and future), we’re a community of pedantic gearheads with an affinity for the peculiar. How else to explain Panther Love or Sajeev’s Bitter Tears?

I’m no different, which is why I like it here. One of the things I enjoy — which no one in my immediate family can seem to explain — are cars and trucks with a weird number of wipers. Two wipers? Pah! How pedestrian. The discerning TTACer requires – nay, demands! – their ride of choice to be equipped with rain-clearing devices of the oddest configuration!

Ahem. Yes. Let’s look at a few, shall we?

Toyota’s FJ Cruiser boasts seemingly non-existent depreciation and a trio of wipers with which to clear its windscreen. T’would would appear the house of Akido discovered two wipers would clear the FJ’s mail-slot forward glass with the effectiveness of a worn-out Regina Electrikbroom, and decided to give it three of the things. I think it was a fabulous decision.

Single wipers are a hoot, too. Some were deployed by their penny-pinching manufacturers in a bid to save a few simoleons, such as on the old Fiat Panda and Renault Twingo. Come replacement time, cheapskate owners of these hatchbacks could bask in their half-price wiper fees.

On the other end of the single-wiper spectrum is the Monoblade system developed by Mercedes and found on the W124 cars. In what is definitely one of the best solo blade systems on the planet, the Benzo’s arm manages to extend outwards during its sweep, clearing more of the glass than it would otherwise — a full 86 percent, according to M-B propaganda.

If one is good, two are better, right? That edict might not hold true for headaches, lawsuits, or bouts of the dropsy, but from 1992-1996 Toyota saw fit to endow the Camry wagon with a brace of wipers on its rear hatch. The twin rear wiper setup cleared the vast expanse of glass in a jiffy, leading me to think some manufacturers would do well to adopt this idea today, especially when I’m trying valiantly to see out the pitiful mailslot that’s been cleared by the single rear wiper on [choose just about any modern crossover].

What’s your favourite odd windshield wiper setup? Don’t be shy; we’re all odd around here … perhaps even odder than the wiper solution on the EleMMent Palazzo.

[Image: Sashkin/ Bigstock, Toyota]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 56 comments
  • JustPassinThru JustPassinThru on Jul 05, 2017

    Not mentioned: The Ford Falcon/Mustang/Maverick wipers that had different points, right arm to left, at the end of their swing. Reason being, the motor crank was offset with two rods working each wiper, and the top point was different relative to the two pivots. It was really annoying, to have first the one wiper stop, than the other as the first wiper took off in the reverse direction. Single wiper: The current generation Toyota Yaris. Say what you want about that McCar, but the single wiper, with its articulation arm (shades of 1970s GM!) does in fact clear more of the glass, and more effectively, than most sets of two wipers on most cars.

  • Thevolvoguy35 Thevolvoguy35 on Oct 22, 2019

    I like the wipers on the R107, w116, and w126 Mercedes. There are two wipers, but both rest on top of each other. One wiper swipes completely to the other side, and the other one goes halfway. It works very well, and it is very neat to see in action. On the w126 the wipers rested below the hood, they were out of sight until needed. And they were very quick on the fastest setting. That system came before the Monoblade system that was introduced on the w124 chassis.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next