Lotus Production Could Begin in China, Claims New Owner

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Iconic British sportscar manufacturer Lotus may find a portion of its future production shifted to China under the ownership of its new parent company, Geely. Chinese billionaire and Geely chairman Li Shufu confirmed the possibility of some assembly taking place outside the United Kingdom during a press conference following the signing of the deal.

While this could stir outrage in some traditionalists, the Chinese company hasn’t mucked up things with Volvo yet and appears willing to apply a similar hands-off approach to the management of Lotus Cars.

“This is just like what we have done with London Taxi Company, engineer in Britain, design in Britain, [build] in Britain,” Li explained. “We see no reason to move fifty years of combined experience to China — let them do what they do best — in Britain.”

Geely officially acquired a 51 percent stake in Lotus as well as 49.9 percent of Malaysian automaker Proton last week — both were previously majority-owned by Malaysia’s DRB-HICOM. Lotus had been struggling under Malaysian ownership for some time but announced a return to profitability earlier this year, due largely to the success of its Evora 400 and the more hardcore Evora Sport 410.

Lotus currently employs about 750 people in Norfolk. While some of them will continue assembly of the Evora, the automaker also has an updated Elise and Exige in the works. There have also been ruminations of a new crossover vehicle, something Geely is encouraging and plans to send to the U.S. market — along with the rest of the cars.

“Geely is fully committed to revitalizing the Lotus brand which will include new investment and a widened car range,” said Li. Specifying that the brand would benefit from future advancements in electrification and artificial intelligence, with those technologies likely stemming from China. However Mr. Li was unclear on the scope of the hypothetical Chinese production and how it might change the longstanding tradition of U.K. assembly further down the road.

[Source: Bloomberg] [Image: Lotus Cars]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Pmirp1 Pmirp1 on Jun 26, 2017

    Please tell Jack Baruth about this. He and Ronnie seem to be in love with Lotus, they must have watched too many old Roger Moore James Bond movies. Meanwhile, Jack still can't give us a Stingray review.

    • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Jun 26, 2017

      I owned a Lotus before Sir Roger stood in for Sean Connery and haven't watched anything from that franchise since Thunderball at the Royal Theater in the mid 1960s. If you want to discuss the shortcomings of British specialist automakers, I'll be happy to be your huckleberry.

  • Verbal Verbal on Jun 27, 2017

    Rotus?

  • Jalop1991 Every state. - Alex Roy
  • CanadaCraig My 2006 300C SRT8 weighs 4,100 lbs. The all-new 2024 Dodge Charge EV weighs 5,800 lbs. Would it not be fair to assume that in an accident the vehicles these new Chargers hit will suffer more damage? And perhaps kill more people?
  • Akila Hello Everyone, I found your blog very informative. If you want to know more about [url=
  • Michael Gallagher I agree to a certain extent but I go back to the car SUV transition. People began to buy SUVs because they were supposedly safer because of their larger size when pitted against a regular car. As more SUVs crowded the road that safety advantage began to dwindle as it became more likely to hit an equally sized SUV. Now there is no safety advantage at all.
  • Probert The new EV9 is even bigger - a true monument of a personal transportation device. Not my thing, but credit where credit is due - impressive. The interior is bigger than my house and much nicer with 2 rows of lounge seats and 3rd for the plebes. 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, around 300miles of range, and an e-mpg of 80 (90 for the 2wd). What a world.
Next