Piston Slap: The Case for the Front-Mounted Transaxle?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

DAG writes:

Why don’t automakers design front-wheel-drive cars with the transaxle in front of the engine? This moves the front wheels forward and improves weight distribution; offers better potential for aerodynamics and leaves space under the hood for pedestrian protection. With a turbo four-cylinder, the engine could have clearance from the firewall. Also, the engine and transaxle could be mounted on a pivoting subframe, hinged at the front, to drop down at the back for major maintenance; disconnect steering and exhaust to drop cradle.

The engine would sit in the space where rack and pinion generally resides; steering gear design would be a challenge for direct mechanical actuation. Perhaps traction would be reduced. Would crashworthiness also be affected?

Sajeev answers:

Interesting query! I’m happy to play devil’s advocate to your modern-day Cord powertrain layout:

  • Potential aerodynamic benefit is eliminated via pedestrian safety regulations. Larger front fascias increase surface area in contact with humans, thereby reducing physical damage from knee-bending.
  • Head protection isn’t likely, thanks to our cab forward designs — more cab, less hood and a greater chance the pedestrian’s head still slams somewhere needing 10 cm of space above the engine intake manifold.
  • Hinged subframes bring crashworthiness concerns. While I can’t google up proof, subframes are designed to prevent the engine from intruding into the passenger compartment in a head-on collision. They normally move down and/or under the firewall, and a hinge introduces a fail point in something that must not fail.
  • Not concerned about steering system interference; most vehicles use electric steering now.
  • V-shaped engines would be tough in this configuration. Perhaps one day we can have a V6 engine renaissance. Perhaps it will lead to something deliciously looney like a second-gen LS4. That’s not likely with this design.

This is probably another case of automakers doing their jobs by not reinventing the wheel, by protecting us from what we want. But hey, if it worked on the Cord …

[Image: Shutterstock user Andy Dean Photography]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Greg Locock Greg Locock on Apr 05, 2017

    "Not concerned about steering system interference; most vehicles use electric steering now." They still have steering columns and steering racks. Main reason I know of is that the space in front of the engine is wasted for crash because it is resisting engine mass as well as the rest of the cabin. If the engine hits the crash barrier immediately then you can use the space behind the engine to decelerate the safety cell.

  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Apr 14, 2017

    Doesn't anyone remember the RUXTON? It used a reverse Inline-8 engine-transaxle, FWD design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruxton_(automobile) And it actually slightly pre-dates the Cord. They are VERY rare. Only 33 of them known to remain, with only about 16 in running condition. The latest restored one auctioned for about $370,000. If you want a really fascinating read, check out this thread on its insanely immaculate restoration: http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?6206837-1932-Ruxton-build-thread-or-quot-How-I-became-an-unwitting-restorer-quot

  • Tassos Jong-iL Mr. Healey, honesty is key and there have been several accusations about your biases towards different brands. We hope you can prove these badactors wrong and show us the proper way.
  • Redapple2 37% USA Canada content. This should pass you off ! THIRTY SEVEN.
  • Theflyersfan I guess I should have kept my first ever car which was also a 1987 Nissan. Probably could have sold it for $50,000 by now if I was living in this fantasy world where used up 37 year old Nissans sell for the same price as a new Versa. I wish a link was here so all of us can check out this treasure among junk 200SX. The only way this car is even remotely worth that kind of money is if there are illicit substances hidden somewhere in the frame that, as part of the sale, you have to drive across the border and "make a delivery." Otherwise, get that thing off of my lawn.
  • Sobro Needs moar Roots.