IIHS Wants Your Teen Driver Behind the Wheel of These Square Used Vehicles

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you’re planning to buy your teen son or daughter their first vehicle — rather than let them work a retail job to save up for a rusting heap — the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety wants a word.

There’s good and almost-as-good choices for used cars out there, and none of them are a ’95 Cavalier with a blown suspension and more fluid leaks than the Bismark. While the IIHS top picks pack piece of mind for parents, kids might cringe at the less-than-sexy choices.

About 83 percent of Americans who buy their kid’s first vehicle head straight to the used market, IIHS claims. $2,000 to $2,000 can buy some pretty sweet rides, but because safety is IIHS’ bible, there’s a distinct lack of vehicles suitable for impromptu drag races.

To keep Bryanna and Brayden safe, the institute recommends a large vehicle with modest horsepower and an all-important four- or five-star crash rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. “Good” ratings in the IIHS moderate overlap front, side and head restraint tests also factor into the choices.

In the “best” category, the list of vehicles under $20,000 contain all the models you’d expect to see an aspiring accountant salivate over. In the full-size field, the Toyota Avalon (2015 and newer) and Volvo S80 (2007 and newer) top the list, with the more desirable 2013 (and newer) Infiniti M37 and M56 rounding out the list.

The low end of the midsize car category includes the 2011 and newer Dodge Avenger and Chrysler 200. Your kids might thank you for the purchase when they’re about 35, following years of hindsight.

Other decent vehicles include late-model variants of the Kia Optima, Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Mazda 6, Hyundai Sonata, Subaru Legacy, Volkswagen Jetta and Passat, Chevrolet Malibu, and a host of others. So sensible, so safe.

In the small SUV category, there’s plenty of vehicles eyebrow-raising choices for a 16- to 19-year-old. They include the Fiat 500x, Chevrolet Trax, and everyone’s favorite soccer mom grocery getter, the Toyota RAV4. Again, IIHS doesn’t pay any mind to image, just safety. Also on the list are both Mitsubishi utility vehicles, the Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Tucson, Nissan Rogue, and the Mazda CX-3.

Midsize SUVs run the gamut of popular sellers, though Japan seems underrepresented with only the 2015 and newer Nissan Pathfinder and Murano. America takes the hit in the pickup category, with the 2014 and newer Toyota Tundra extended cab serving as the sole entry. If your child is popular, they’ll no doubt love the commodious seating and cargo space of the late model Kia Sedona, Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna minivans. (None of which are as cool the the ’84 Town & Country — with stick shift — in my high school parking lot).

Turning its attention to “good” choices under $10,000, IIHS recommends a number of models that appeared on the “best” list, only older. Yes, the Avalon makes a return, joined by the 2010 and newer Buick LaCrosse. The 2009 and newer Ford Taurus remains a Duratec-powered safety cruise, while the Taurus X, Saturn Vue and Subaru B9 Tribeca join a roster of (much) more commonplace sedans and SUVs.

Nonconformists will rejoice at the list, actually. Saturn Outlook? Check. Last-generation Saab 9-3? If you can find one, it’s good to go. The same goes for 2011 and newer Nissan Quests. If a pickup is a must, Ford’s 2009 and newer F-150 crew cab models join the aforementioned Tundra in the largest vehicle category, but forget about appearing quirky.

Given the generous size of the list, there should be no problem finding a deal on a reasonably low-mileage example of one of the models. However, you’d best give your kid a choice to avoid a Walter White Jr.-in-Breaking Bad scenario.

Actually, if it’s your money, let yourself have all the say.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 147 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Apr 17, 2017

    Well, I dunno if IIHS wants my kid behind the wheel of our '03 Buick, but that's what she's got!

    • Thorshammer_gp Thorshammer_gp on Apr 17, 2017

      I can only imagine the horrified look on the face of the IIHS inspector that would've seen me in the Honda del Sol or '01 Grand Prix that I drove at various times in high school, but same deal. ...Of course, Inspector Mom wasn't thrilled about the del Sol, either!

  • Zoomzoomfan Zoomzoomfan on Apr 17, 2017

    My first car: '92 Chevrolet Beretta base model. 2.2 MPFI four-cylinder with 110 screaming horsepower and the 3t40 three-speed automatic. 71,000 miles on it when we bought it for $1,250 in July 2005. The ABS didn't really work, but it did technically have it. And there was an airbag. Don't know if it worked, either. I'm glad I never wrecked beyond one fender bender.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next