Finally, The Toyota Highlander Hybrid Is Affordable And Actually Starts To Make Sense
For far too long, the Toyota Highlander Hybrid has been an especially costly version of Toyota’s popular three-row crossover.
Fortunately, the Toyota Highlander Hybrid’s base price drops by $11,600 in 2017 as Toyota introduces two additional lower trim levels, which have eased the cost burden of upgrading to the hybrid.
Launched in 2006, the first Toyota Highlander Hybrid was 35 percent more costly than the basic Toyota Highlander of the same era. More recently, in the 2016 model year, the Toyota Highlander Hybrid AWD was 43 percent more expensive than the least costly V6 AWD Highlander; $17,380 more than the entry-level, front-wheel-drive, four-cylinder Highlander.
The gap wasn’t so vast in apples-to-apples comparisons. Toyota traditionally limited the Highlander’s hybrid powertrain to buyers who wanted particularly well-equipped Highlanders. In 2016, for instance, the only Highlander Hybrids were Limiteds and Platinums with all-wheel drive. Compared with a non-hybrid Limited, the Highlander Hybrid Limited still represented a premium option: $5,495, or a 13-percent hike. But that hike wasn’t entirely out of sync with what we’ve become accustomed to in the gas versus gas/electric world.
Having now learned with the RAV4 just how successful a hybrid SUV can be, Toyota is employing a similar strategy with the larger Highlander.
In 2016, having introduced lower trim levels and improved availability, Toyota reported 45,097 RAV4 Hybrid sales. That’s better than one-in-ten RAV4 sales; more RAV4 Hybrid sales than some 50 SUVs/crossovers managed in 2016.
The strategy for the Highlander Hybrid can’t be the same now as it was a decade ago. “When gas was $4, the market would accept a certain premium for hybrids. Today at $2.50, it’s a much smaller premium that’s acceptable,” Toyota’s North American CEO Jim Lentz told Wards Auto.
Understanding this, added to the Highlander Hybrid Limited and Platinum trims are new LE and XLE trims. At $37,265 including fees, the 2017 Highlander Hybrid LE AWD now costs $2,130 more than the Highlander LE V6 AWD. The Highlander Hybrid XLE AWD is only $1,745 more than the non-hybrid XLE AWD. The Highlander Hybrid Limited AWD and Hybrid Platinum AWD demand only a $1,620 premium compared with their equivalent non-hybrid AWD siblings.
Combined fuel economy for the regular Highlander V6 AWD tops out at 23 miles per gallon. Highlander Hybrid combined fuel economy rises as high as 29 mpg, saving the Highlander Hybrid driver roughly $300 in fuel costs per year.
In 2016, only 3 percent of the Highlanders sold were hybrid-powered. It’s unlikely the hybridized Highlander will form as significant a portion of overall Highlander sales as the hybrid power does for the RAV4. But in concert with improvements across the Highlander range for 2017, improved hybrid pricing should aid the Highlander in repeating 2016’s performance as the best-ever year for Highlander sales in America.
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- SCE to AUX How well does the rear camera work in the rain and snow?
- MaintenanceCosts The Truth About Isuzu Troopers!
- Jalop1991 MC's silence in this thread is absolutely deafening.
- MaintenanceCosts Spent some time last summer with a slightly older Expedition Max with about 100k miles on the clock, borrowed from a friend for a Colorado mountain trip.It worked pretty well on the trip we used it for. The EcoBoost in this fairly high state of tune has a freight train feeling and just keeps pulling even way up at 12k ft. There is unending space inside; at one point we had six adults, two children, and several people's worth of luggage inside, with room left over. It was comfortable to ride in and well-equipped.But it is huge. My wife refused to drive it because she couldn't get comfortable with the size. I used to be a professional bus driver and it reminded me quite a bit of driving a bus. It was longer than quite a few parking spots. Fortunately, the trip didn't involve anything more urban than Denver suburbs, so the size didn't cause any real problems, but it reminded me that I don't really want such a behemoth as a daily driver.
- Jalop1991 It seems to me this opens GM to start substituting parts and making changes without telling anyone, AND without breaking any agreements with Allison. Or does no one remember Ignitionswitchgate?At the core of the problem is a part in the vehicle's ignition switch that is 1.6 millimeters less "springy" than it should be. Because this part produces weaker tension, ignition keys in the cars may turn off the engine if shaken just the right way...2001: GM detects the defect during pre-production testing of the Saturn Ion.2003: A service technician closes an inquiry into a stalling Saturn Ion after changing the key ring and noticing the problem was fixed.2004: GM recognizes the defect again as the Chevrolet Cobalt replaces the Cavalier.fast forward through the denials, driver deaths, and government bailouts2012: GM identifies four crashes and four corresponding fatalities (all involving 2004 Saturn Ions) along with six other injuries from four other crashes attributable to the defect.Sept. 4, 2012: GM reports August 2012 sales were up 10 percent from the previous year, with Chevrolet passenger car sales up 25 percent.June 2013: A deposition by a Cobalt program engineer says the company made a "business decision not to fix this problem," raising questions of whether GM consciously decided to launch the Cobalt despite knowing of a defect.Dec. 9, 2013: Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announces the government had sold the last of what was previously a 60 percent stake in GM, ending the bailout. The bailout had cost taxpayers $10 billion on a $49.5 billion investment.End of 2013: GM determines that the faulty ignition switch is to blame for at least 31 crashes and 13 deaths.It took over 10 years for GM to admit fault.And all because an engineer decided to trim a pin by tenths of a millimeter, without testing and without getting anyone else's approval.Fast forward to 2026, and the Allison name is no longer affiliated with the transmissions. You do the math.
Comments
Join the conversation
So what does this do to depreciation for 2016 and older owners? I'm guessing it isn't pretty...
Toyota needs to pair this with a 4 cylinder to get a more serious mpg improvement. Make it cheaper than the Pacifica hybrid and the most fuel efficient 3 row vehicle aside from that.