Looking for Cheap, Low-stress Car Ownership? Head to the Cornfields

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If it wasn’t for the blissful autonomy and convenience that comes with car ownership, how many people would want to shoulder the ever-growing cost? Insurers lie in wait to squeeze you, law enforcement waits to punish you, environmental groups demonize your lifestyle, and governments at all levels salivate at the thought of making it more expensive to own a personal vehicle.

Meanwhile, you dance to the tune set by oil companies and geopolitics, weathering financial blows when pump prices rise. If only there was a place where those worries fell away — where the act of owning and driving a car wasn’t as stressful.

As it turns out, this place exists. And it’s just west of the Mississippi.

According to a study by Bankrate.com, the easiest place to own a car sits smack in the center of the union. Frustrated drivers, get thee to the Hawkeye State.

The financial services company has declared Iowa as the least-expensive, least-dangerous state in which to own a vehicle, based on average insurance premiums, gas prices, commute times, car repair costs, vehicle theft rate, and road fatalities. It’s like heaven for vehicles, only with miles and miles of corn.

To make its ranking, Bankrate tapped data from the census, FBI, CarMD, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. By a not-too-small degree, Iowa won. Out of a possible 60 points, the state landed a score of 48, far above the national average of 34.6.

Drivers in Iowa commute an average of 19 minutes, and spend a low $648 each year on insurance coverage. An average repair sets an Iowan back $358. While several states spend less on gas and have lower theft rates — as well as slightly lower roadway deaths — it all averaged out in the state’s favor. That sound you hear is contentment emanating from Davenport to Des Moines.

Rounding out the top five states are Ohio, Maine, Wisconsin and Vermont. Naturally, California ranks dead last at 21 points, but few residents would trade the higher average costs and longer commutes for the weather “enjoyed” by the top-ranked states. New Mexico came in second last, while Nevada, Louisiana and Wyoming filled out the bottom five.

It’s true that the study’s methodology paints an inaccurate for many car owners. With its higher median income and greater proportion of luxury vehicles, an average repair in California would naturally ring in higher than one a less populous, less prosperous state. As well, we all know that Californian cities are magnets for car thieves. With a carefully chosen lifestyle and some luck, a driver can escape much of the pain that comes from living in a low-ranked state. (But not the weather.)

[Image: Don Graham/ Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Dec 14, 2016

    When I moved from Iowa to California the first couple quotes I got for the Cobra replica was $2100 per 6 months and I was not in a major city. I was paying 308 per year in Iowa for similar coverage. Finally talked Wawanesa into covering it. They were pretty good. Now I am back in the midwest. Ubermensch, you also have U of I hospitals. They have helped our daughter a great deal. Worth the drive from across the river.

  • Ericb91 Ericb91 on Dec 15, 2016

    Yep, it's cheap. I live in rural NW Illinois, 40 mins from the Quad Cities (two of which are in Iowa, two in Illinois). My commute is 2.6 miles round-trip. Nothin' quite like these agricultural small towns!

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next