Salespeople Vs. Reality: When Dealers Misrepresent Technology, You Lose

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
salespeople vs reality when dealers misrepresent technology you lose

Industry watchdogs are becoming increasingly concerned that salespeople are misrepresenting new vehicles’ semi-autonomous features to customers. Considering that most salespeople work on commission, consumers are used to hearing that prices are non-negotiable or that they will get a “great deal” on their trade-in. Dealer fibbing is par for the course.

However, claiming a car’s safety capabilities are more robust than they actually are — either due to greed or ignorance — can cost both parties more than a few extra bucks.

In an interview with Automotive News, Ibro Muharemovic, the head of advanced engineering at Continental, said that he’s dismayed by the lack of consumer understanding regarding active safety technology. Muharemovi, who worked on a lane-recognition system for an unnamed American automaker, brought his mother to a dealership in 2010 to show her the final result of all of his hard work.

“I asked the dealer what the car could do, and then he kind of scared me,” Muharemovic said. “He told me the car could drive itself. I knew for a fact that it couldn’t.”

“Bottom line, educating the consumers on the capabilities of active safety and automated driving vehicles — and highlighting the benefits of such systems — is critical,” he said.

Automotive News cited an example where Donna Lee, an overly trusting Georgian, was told during a test drive not to brake at an approaching intersection. The salesperson assumed the Mercedes-Benz GL450’s driver assistance systems would activate and bring the vehicle to a stop without driver input. Instead, the Benz collided with the stopped car in front of it at around 40 miles an hour. Lee and the salesman survived but not before demolishing several cars and giving a teenager a concussion.

Idiocy such as this isn’t exclusive to dealership sales reps. Tesla has sent some pretty mixed messages on its own hands-free driving system, leading one Model S owner to trust the technology so implicitly that he allowed it to place him beneath a tractor trailer earlier this year.

That tragic May 7th crash helped convince the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to become more involved in autonomous technology and take a fairly conservative approach toward dealing with it. However, many groups feel its Federal Automated Vehicles Policy doesn’t go far enough establishing clear guidelines — especially in regard to making sure consumers are made literate of their own vehicle’s capabilities.

One of the biggest problems facing the NHTSA is how varied semi-autonomous technologies are between brands. In collision avoidance, some systems might attempt to bring the car to a dead stop, while others may simply slow the vehicle. Lane-keeping technology can a warn a driver when they venture outside the lines, but some cars actively manage steering inputs to keep the car in its lane.

Mike Jackson, CEO of AutoNation, said that he doesn’t think the problem or confusion will be effectively solved until fully autonomous vehicles begin to arrive on dealership lots.

“Until then, it’s going to be a mess,” he told AN.

Even with the proposed training, Jackson thinks dealerships would still face significant problems as driver assist and semi-autonomous tech becomes more prevalent.

Despite training efforts by automakers, Jackson said, there may be systemic dealership issues that could cause significant problem. The National Automobile Dealers Association has data showing exceptionally high staff turnover rates — 65 percent for salesmen and 88 percent of saleswomen in 2015.

With retention so low, dealerships will always be at a disadvantage when it comes to having enough informed and tech-savvy employees on hand. Still, Jackson doesn’t even seem to believe that an average salesperson is even capable of discussing technical features with consumers in a meaningful way.

“A lot of people who love talking about technology, the last thing they want to do is talk about price,” Jackson said. “That’s not what they want to do with their days. It’s an oxymoron. They don’t go together.”

Join the conversation
5 of 68 comments
  • VoGo VoGo on Dec 05, 2016

    This reminds me of a true story about a corporate real estate agent in Toronto. He was bragging about how strong the windows were in a building on the 30th floor to a bunch of impressionable summer interns. To prove his point, he ran into the window, expecting it to hold up. It didn't. 300 feet down.

    • See 2 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 05, 2016

      @runs_on_h8raide - This is from Snopes: "ORIGIN:It isn't often we have occasion to employ the term "accidental self-defenestration" in an article, but that phrase certainly applies to the case of Garry Hoy, a 38-year-old lawyer with the Toronto law firm of Holden Day Wilson, who on 9 July 1993 plunged to his death from the 24th floor of the Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower building at TD Centre in front of several horrified witnesses. For motivations that remain unclear to this day Hoy had apparently developed a fondness for showing off the tensile strength of office building windows (and/or demonstrating his fearless trust in that aspect of building design) by running and hurling himself at window panes in front of onlookers, who would watch a stunt that always ended with Hoy's bouncing off of the window panes, leaving both glass and lawyer unharmed. On a fateful day in 1993, however, Hoy attempted his feat in front of a group of prospective legal apprentices with disastrous results: Apparently the first attempt came off as usual with Hoy harmlessly rebounding off the window, but when Hoy threw himself against the pane a second time, it popped out of its frame and sent Hoy fatally tumbling 24 stories to the courtyard below." ................................................................................. It was a lawyer not a salesman but both tend to share the "least trusted profession" title with politicians.

  • OneAlpha OneAlpha on Dec 06, 2016

    Dealers can get away with this kind of dishonesty - and every other kind of lie regarding the products they're selling - because People Hate Math.

  • SCE to AUX Faraday Future shouldn't even be here, and they won't make it. Other ultra-expensive EVs are fun projects for companies who can fund them from other revenue.The Lucid Air is a strange one because it starts at $87k but can run to over $250k. Most cars jump only around 50% for top trims, not 300%.As for EVs - don't give me more power (easy); give me more range (hard). And quicker filling time.
  • Dukeisduke It's funny how stuff like this crosses over between sites nowadays - there's an article about it today on MacRumors: Polestar 2 Software Update Brings Wave of New Apple CarPlay Features - MacRumors
  • Fahrvergnugen "If you’re itching for an ultra-exclusive EV – and who isn’t – "Me...
  • Dukeisduke Tim, once all this foam is everywhere, how do you get rid of it? Does it take a while to break down? I think of the scene in the 1963 James Garner / Doris Day film "The Thrill Of It All", where boxes of soap end up in the swimming pool, creating mountains of foam. The Thrill of It All (1963) - IMDb
  • MrIcky I have a foam cannon, it makes washing the car much faster which helps me do it more often. Foam cannon>pressure wash>suds bucket and mitt for tough spots but touch as little as possible>pressure wash those spots>spray on some detailer solution as I dry to keep the water beading up. 15 minutes-ish?