Ace of Base: Nissan 370Z Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

There’s not much new in the 2017 Nissan 370Z, and it has largely been that way since Nissan introduced it way back in, uh, wow, 2009.

Sure, an equivalently priced Mustang or Camaro is arguably more modern with better technology, but you’ll never find one of those models in this series. Why? Because, in your author’s humble opinion, buying either of those cars with the base engine is as pointless as an ashtray on a motorcycle.

The Z, though? That’s a different story.

There’s no shame in signing the note for a base Z, where $29,990 nets buyers a slick-looking rear-wheel drive coupe with double-wishbone suspension and a 3,300-pound curb weight. Nissan’s ubiquitous 3.7-liter DOHC V6 makes 332 horsepower in this application and the aftermarket support for go-fast goodies is vast. The snick-snick six-speed manual doesn’t have Synchro Rev Match at this price but hey, you know how to heel-and-toe, right?

The fast cut of the Z’s roofline recalls the same styling flourish in the mighty GT-R. While certain dusty corners of the internet have grumbled that Godzilla is getting a bit long in the tooth, no one can argue the benefits of a familial resemblance to a vehicle capable of achieving sub-3.0 second 0-60 times.

A next-generation Z is rumored to be in the works, but it may not immediately follow the path of this model. It’s very unlikely the V6 will return, being supplanted by a polar-bear friendly, downsized turbo-four. Appreciate this naturally aspirated Z while you can.

Refreshingly, Nissan sees fit not to charge extra for seven of the eight shades offered on the Z palette. The new-for-2017 Chicane Yellow is my color of choice because I am an obnoxious extrovert. Its $0 Deep Blue Pearl is also acceptable. American customers can option a delicious Black Cherry hue not offered north of the border.

But for those Canucks, the deal is even better. Nissan’s Zed in base trim is priced only eight dollars higher than an equal American version, equating to (at today’s exchange rate) a few shades over $23,000. Now that’s an Ace of Base.

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a whole lot better. What do you think of this choice, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 36 comments
  • RRocket RRocket on Sep 07, 2016

    Since the Canada angle was brought up....a Mustang GT costs $5K more here than a 370Z. And the 370z is an impressive performer. I remember a few comparos where it was as quick as a Cayman around a track. No small feat.

  • Jagboi Jagboi on Sep 07, 2016

    By "doesn’t have Synchro Rev Match" does that mean the tranmission doesn't have syncromesh? I thought that disappeared in car transmissions in the 60's, if not earlier? I've driven a non syncro transmission and double clutching each change isn't a lot of fun in city driving. The straight cut gear whine of first gear in a 3.8 Jaguar E Type is a great noise though...

    • See 1 previous
    • JMII JMII on Sep 08, 2016

      @rpn453 The system just rev matches, basically it does the heel-toe for you. It adjusts RPM based on the vehicles speed and your gear selection. It can handle gear skips too, IE: downshifts from 5th to 3rd for engine braking while coming to a stop on the street (not recommended on track). I assume double clutching has no effect on it, as mentioned its a throttle-by wire computer trick. I think it would be a fun feature. I can heel-toe in traffic in my Z, but can't manage it on track. I think its due to not having racing seats with a harness. As is I can't pivot the ball of my foot and roll onto the gas with my heel because all my weight is on my foot as I fight to keep myself in the seat. Its no biggie as I'm not looking for ultimate lap time and thus no trail braking or doing any mid-corner downshifts as these upset the balance of the car. I don't have the talent to recover is such situations.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next