Automatic Emergency Braking Won't Always Stop a Crash, But Americans Think It Will

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Automatic emergency braking is finding its way into more and more cars (and automakers have a pact to make it standard equipment by 2022), but most drivers don’t know the technology’s limitations.

AEB systems slow or stop a vehicle in an emergency, preventing or mitigating a crash, but an American Automobile Association study shows that 71 percent of U.S. drivers familiar with the technology believe AEB will prevent all crashes.

AAA partnered with the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center to test five 2016 models equipped with AEB. The tests showed the systems worked more or less as planned. During 70 trials, vehicles with AEB designed to prevent crashes slowed by twice the amount as those designed to simply slow the vehicle before impact.

Vehicles designed to prevent crashes shed, on average, 79 percent of their speed before impact. Those designed to mitigate the crash slowed by 40 percent. In tests conducted at speeds of 30 miles per hour or less, crash-avoiding AEB systems prevented 60 percent of the planned collisions

Still, there were some surprises in store for researchers. Under 30 mph, the systems designed to only lessen the impact actually avoided a collision 33 percent of the time.

At higher speeds, the performance of both systems diminished. At 45 mph, the crash-avoidance systems slowed the test vehicle by 74 percent, on average, and prevented collisions 40 percent of the time. The lesser AEB system only reduced vehicle speeds by nine percent.

Obviously, any reduction in speed helps the vehicle’s occupants. A speed reduction from 30 to 20 mph cuts the energy of an impact by 50 percent.

Still, the majority of drivers believe that all AEB systems will prevent a crash, without the need to manually apply the brakes. There’s a risk that motorists in AEB-equipped vehicles will become overconfident in their vehicle’s abilities. Slowing to 36 mph before hitting another vehicle is a far different outcome that avoiding the other car completely.

“The reality is that today’s systems vary greatly in performance, and many are not designed to stop a moving car,” said John Nielsen, AAA’s managing director of Automotive Engineering and Repair, in a statement.

Currently, nine percent of Americans drive a vehicle equipped with AEB. By September, 2022, virtually every new light-duty truck and car will carry the technology as standard equipment.

[Image: Daniel X. O’Neil/ Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 44 comments
  • Trucky McTruckface Trucky McTruckface on Aug 24, 2016

    Breaking news: Human stupidity threatens ability to maintain oxygen inhalation. Film at 11.

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 25, 2016

    "Still, the majority of drivers believe that all AEB systems will prevent a crash, without the need to manually apply the brakes." Yeah, people are stupid. And they rely on and trust technology too much - implicitly and instantaneously. They assume because they have a feature, their guard and common sense can be disabled. See: Tesla Autopilot See: GPS crashes See: AWD overconfidence See: ABS overconfidence See: Backup cameras

    • See 1 previous
    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Aug 26, 2016

      See car and driver decapitated. See car in lake, off road, off bridge, off side of Grand Canyon. See Subie or Subbie in ditch! See car in trunk of other car! See crushed kid toy. Makes sense!

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next