Junkyard Find: 1986 Pontiac Fiero SE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Pontiac Fiero was a frequent junkyard sighting up until about a decade ago, but now they’re quite rare. So far in this series, we have seen this excessively yellow ’86, this ’88 Formula, and now today’s Iron Duke-powered ’86.

The SE was the second-to-top Fiero trim level for ’86, and it came with aluminum wheels and a black “aero package.”

Unfortunately, the SE didn’t come standard with the 140-horsepower 2.8-liter V6. Instead, the gnashy, rattly, shaky 2.5-liter pushrod Iron Duke four-cylinder offered 92 horses.

You were in the danger zone when you revved the Duke to 4,500 rpm. Meanwhile, the ’86 Toyota MR2 came with a 112-horsepower 1.6-liter engine, weighed 2,282 pounds (versus the Fiero’s 2,499 pounds), and sold for $11,298 (versus the Fiero’s $10,595). On top of that, the ’86 Honda CRX Si listed for $8,279 (though you’d probably end up paying a lot more than that), weighed a mere 1,954 pounds and packed 91 high-revving horses in its 1.5-liter engine.

Did any affordable sporty cars of the 1980s escape the decade without an application of this horrible purple window film?

The Fiero keeps its fuel tank in this tall central chassis spine, and the coolant lines live in channels on the other sides of the seats. This put the Fiero driver deep in a trough.

I was in college in Southern California around this time, and I don’t recall seeing a single Fiero in the campus parking lots. Plenty of shiny new Volkswagen GTIs, Fox Mustangs, and Honda CRXs, of course, but no Fieros. Maybe things were different in the Midwest.

Strangely, no mention of the Iron Duke in this ad.

[Image: © 2016 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • TomLU86 TomLU86 on Jun 06, 2016

    Let's all try to get along. Everyone has a point... AIDS was not trivial...but if 50 million have died of malaria since DDT was banned, and we can't quantify the benefit (and we probably can't), THAT is worse. Reagan made people feel good again, yes. He also PRESIDED OVER an era in which debt on many levels increased to levels that (till then) had been unprecedented--public and private. This paved the way for where we are. Yet, he Reagan had common sense. He actually talked to the Soviets, and did NOT provoke them. HE did not cause the massive deficits that ran up the debt--but he was not entirely innocent. The Democratic Congress ran up entitlements. Reagan wanted to cut taxes and increase defense (which contributed to the end of the Cold War), and to get enough Dem support, he let the Dems spend on THEIR priorities. Key words...SPEND! As for Carter, I remember the malaise era...1979, peak malaise! US hostages in Iran, the aborted rescue debacle, the spike in gas prices that year. Later, in the 80s, I learned that "Jimmuh" was the choice of the 'establishment'--so I liked him even less. Mr. Human Rights lifted the lame US arms embargo on Turkey, which had illegally attacked Cyprus, and in which 7 Americans simply...vanished. Carter = LOSER!!! And yet, now, looking back, Carter also had a few good points. The biggest was, to try to reduce energy use in particular, and live within our means in general. That didn't play well with the voters then. But now we seem overextended...to me at least. As for the Fiero--like many good "new" GM ideas, it wasn't ready for prime time at lauch (Corvair--rear sway bar, Vega, bad engine & rust, X-car...) but at the end of it's life, the Fiero V6 5-spd was a terrific car by the standards of 1988! And while Carter's malaise era winners were....full-size GM cars and Ford's Fox Fairmonts, Reagan presided over the renaissance of good cars people could afford---starting with the 82 Ford's Fox Mustang GT, the PA-made 83 Rabbit GTI, and (sadly for GM) many imports (Honda Civics, the Toyota Supra and MR2), the 82 Accord, the 86 Taurus.....

  • Nicktcfcsb Nicktcfcsb on Jun 10, 2016

    Speaking of the purple window tint, I had an old timer tell me it was the high levels of ammonia in window cleaner that did the black to purple change, maybe he was wrong but I've never used any window cleaner since on tinted windows. R.i.p lil mid engine buddy

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next