Ask the Editor: Why Can't I Buy a Dodge Dart GT Manual in PA?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Duncan writes:

Because I want a car that will depreciate faster than my 2014 Genesis 5.0 R-Spec, I inquired at a local Pennsylvania Dodge dealer about a 2016 Dart GT with a manual transmission. After a week of them trying to order one for me, I was told that the factory would not sell the Dart GT with a manual transmission to PA dealers because of something to do with emissions.

I figured I was being given the runaround so I did a search and, sure enough, there were no 2016 Dodge Dart GTs with manual transmissions for sale in PA.

What gives?

I can’t say I have ever heard of someone wanting to trade in their semi-luxury, full-size sedan for a lukewarm compact that’s about to be killed off. Nor have I ever thought Dodge would thwart a potential sale based on not meeting emissions while, at the same time, buying all those CAFE credits every year.

However, the reason the dealer provided you for not being able to order a Dodge Dart GT with a stick is right and wrong at the same time.

Pennsylvania is one of 13 states that have adopted California’s emissions standards. The others are Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. That makes it more difficult to sell vehicles in these states and why California-based “The Price is Right” always mentions those free cars meeting such standards.

Nonetheless, Dodge itself declared the Dodge Dart GT a Partial Zero Emission Vehicle (PZEV) in 2015:

New for the 2015 model year, the 2.4-liter Tigershark MultiAir2 engine is available as a Partial Zero Emission Vehicle (PZEV), which entails a new fuel filler neck, new air cleaner, new engine downpipe, revised fuel tank, modified vapor purge canister and new fuel cap. This engine is available in the 14 California Air Resources Board (CARB) states.

That seems like a lot of engineering. So why is it that the Dodge Dart GT can’t be sold in Pennsylvania when Dodge themselves went through all the extra effort of engineering the car to meet the CARB standard?

As it turns out, FCA’s ordering system was on the fritz.

“Your inquiry this morning alerted us to an internal glitch in the system dealers use to order cars,” explained Kathy Graham, FCA’s product public relations manager for compact and mid-size vehicles. “In short, there was confusion in the system between the PZEV engine and the 50 state engines, and it showed that dealers couldn’t order a Dart GT manual in Pennsylvania. We’ve corrected the error and dealers in Pennsylvania should now be able to order a Dart GT with a manual transmission.”

Fortunately for FCA, manual Dodge Dart GTs are a small percentage of overall Dart sales and the glitch was short lived, but it did affect all CARB states.

So, thanks to TTAC, you can now order a manual Dodge Dart GT in Pennsylvania … or Maine, or Vermont, or California.

You’re welcome — or sorry.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 105 comments
  • Omer333 Omer333 on Feb 08, 2016

    I liked my Dart. "Liked" is the key word in that sentence.

    • See 1 previous
    • Omer333 Omer333 on Feb 09, 2016

      @SCE to AUX After several months Chrysler finally decided to give me a cash-payout that paid off the car and reimbursed me what I paid to the company my car was financed through. There was weeks of back and forth over getting paperwork signed. I'm STILL trying to get the money back on the rental car my wife had to get for several weeks during this whole fiasco. I look at Chrysler products, like Darts and Chargers and think "Nice car, but I'm not going through the headache of their lousy customer service again."

  • Incautious Incautious on Feb 10, 2016

    Nothing new here. This goes all the way back to the 70's. Try buying a new 1978 L82 corvette with 4 speed back in the day in certain areas like California or some parts of the northeast. It just wasn't allowed. Of course you could buy a used one with say 100 miles on it with no problem. EPA nannies work in strange ways.

  • ToolGuy Good for them, good for me.
  • Tassos While I have been a very satisfied Accord Coupe and CIvic Hatch (both 5-speed) owner for decades (1994-2017 and 1991-2016 respectively), Honda has made a ton of errors later.Its EVs are GM clones. That alone is sufficient for them to sink like a stone. They will bleed billions, and will take them from the billions they make of the Civic, Accord, CRV and Pilot.Its other EVs will be overpriced as most Hondas, and few will buy them. I'd put my money on TOyota and his Hybrid and Plug-in strategy, until breaktrhus significantly improve EVs price and ease of use, so that anybody can have an EV as one's sole car.
  • ToolGuy Good for Honda, good for Canada.Bad for Ohio, how could my President let this happen? lol
  • Tassos A terrible bargain, as are all of Tim's finds, unless they can be had at 1/2 or 1/5th the asking price.For this fugly pig, I would not buy it at any price. My time is too valuable to flip ugly Mitsus.FOr those who know these models, is that silly spoiler in the trunk really functional? And is its size the best for optimizing performance? Really? Why do we never see a GTI or other "hot hatches' and poor man's M3s similarly fitted? Is the EVO trying to pose as a short and fat 70s ROadrunner?Beep beep!
  • Carson D Even Tesla can't make money on EVs anymore. There are far too many being produced, and nowhere near enough people who will settle for one voluntarily. Command economies produce these results. Anyone who thinks that they're smarter than a free market at allocating resources has already revealed that they are not.
Next