Piston Slap: Justy-fied Freestylin' Over CVTs (PART VI)

by Sajeev Mehta

Updated: October 21st, 2019 Published: January 12th, 2016

piston slap justy fied freestylin over cvts part vi

TTAC commentator Patrickj writes:

Sajeev, an update:

My 2006 Ford Freestyle that started this series has been traded in after 184,000 miles. It’s replacement is a 2015 Subaru Legacy, so I guess I wasn’t scared off by the CVT.

The reason for getting the Subaru is mostly because of the second A/C failure of the summer in the Freestyle, though it also needed four struts, assorted bushings, and a steering shaft (u-joints doing a weird stick-slip thing). CVT and engine have been been fine to the end, with only two transmission fluid changes.

Sajeev answers:

Patrick’s Freestyle was three years old in the first Piston Slap, starting the “Justy-fied” CVT postings. Are we getting old?

And keep in mind his Freestyle had 75,000 miles back then. With 184,000 miles now, this CVT lived the relaxed life of a more-highway-than-city cruiser. So what does this update mean?

Here are some takeaways:

Transmission/transaxle fluid changes every 90,000-ish miles are a very good thing (or sooner, better RTFM on that).
Just because the Internet makes a blanket statement about something (like CVT durability) doesn’t make it true.**
If you need a cheap set of wheels for a couple of years, higher mileage vehicles might be a better value! Don’t shy away from one — go kick the tires.
CVTs may be slow to react, but modern 6+ speed autoboxes are rather slow on a factory tune. Considering their fuel efficiency and the ability to keep the engine in its powerband during hard acceleration, are CVTs really that bad?

** Except for Panther Love. That’s totally true.

[Photo courtesy: Shutterstock user Pixel B]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

#Cvt #CvtDurability #FluidChange #FordFreestyle #Freestyle #HighMileage #Service #SubaruLegacy #TransmissionService

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 35 comments

Felix Hoenikker on Jan 12, 2016

I remember renting both the Freestyle and the Rogue in 2006/2007. I had each one for two weeks. I now have a 14 Accord with the CVT. As I recall, both the Rogue and Freestyle displayed a lot of "rubber banding" when accelerating. It was quite noticeable, and I could see why many would find it annoying. Honda seems to have eliminated that on the Accord. In fact, the only way I now that it's a CVT is by the lack of shifting.

Like Reply
MrFixit1599 on Jan 13, 2016

I have a question that I am too lazy to look up. What is the difference between the CVT in the Freestyle and the Escape Hybrid? We have 2 older ones in our work fleet, and both are over 300K with zero maintenance on the transmission, since it is supposedly a sealed system. I heard at one time that the Freestyle uses belts, and the Escape uses planetary gear sets. Which is the preferred style? Which is better?

Like Reply
- Scoutdude on Jan 13, 2016
  
  The Escape has an eCVT and is integral to the hybrid system just like on Toyota Hybrids. They do use a planetary gear set. This page as a good description along with an interactive animation that shows how the speeds of the range MG and Ice make for a CVT. http://eahart.com/prius/psd/ Other CVTs use a belt of sorts with variable diameter pulleys. The eCVT is the most elegant and simplest solution to the CVT problem if you ignore the fact that it needs the hybrid controller and battery pack to make it all work. Because it is a simple planetary gear set there are no belts, pulleys and actuators to wear which does mean that they can really rack up the miles. Unlike conventional automatics there are no clutches, or bands to wear either.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

EBFlex Honda all day long. Why? It's a Honda.
Lou_BC My ex had issues with the turbo CRV not warming up in the winter.I'd lean to the normally aspirated RAV 4. In some cases asking people to chose is like asking a Muslim and Christian to pick their favourite religion.
3-On-The-Tree Agree turbo diesels are probably a different setup lower compression heat etc. I never towed with my rig and it was all 40 miles round trip to work with dealer synthetic oil 5,000mi changes. Don’t know the cause but it soured my opinion on turbo’s plus the added potential expense.
DesertNative More 'Look at me! Look at me!' from Elon Musk. It's time to recognize that there's nothing to see here, folks and that this is just about pumping up the stock price. When there's a real product on the ground and available, then there will be something to which we can pay attention. Until then, ignore him.
Bkojote Here's something you're bound to notice during ownership that won't come up in most reviews or test drives-Honda's Cruise Control system is terrible. Complete trash. While it has the ability to regulate speed if there's a car in front of you, if you're coasting down a long hill with nobody in front of you the car will keep gaining speed forcing you to hit the brakes (and disable cruise). It won't even use the CVT to engine brake, something every other manufacturer does. Toyota's system will downshift and maintain the set speed. The calibration on the ACC system Honda uses is also awful and clearly had minimum engineering effort.Here's another- those grille shutters get stuck the minute temperature drops below freezing meaning your engine goes into reduced power mode until you turn it off. The Rav4 may have them but I have yet to see this problem.