Nissan Announces Proposal To Wrest Power From Renault, Paris

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

Nissan has announced a proposal which would end Renault’s control of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, and would curtail interferance by the French government.

When we last left off, Nissan was looking to gain a voice in the alliance it made in 1999 with Renault by increasing its stake while mitigating the stake shared between Renault and Paris. The Japanese automaker has held a 15 percent non-voting stake since alliance CEO Carlos Ghosn turned around its fortunes in the early 2000s, as French law prevents affiliates owning less than 40 percent of a French-led company from voting at the shareholders’ table.

Nissan has other ideas.

The stipulations would become a problem in the following decade as Nissan outgrew Renault in sales while also leading in engineering and other fields. The widening gulf has since led to an ongoing standoff since April 2015 between Nissan and Paris after economy minister Emmanuel Macron used a new voting rights law — meant to strengthen voting power of shareholders holding long-term stakes in a given company — to boost Paris’ ownership in Renault from 15 percent to 19.7 percent, securing the government’s standing in the overall alliance.

Reuters reports Nissan’s new proposal would seek limits to voting rights held by the government, along with written guarantees no intervention in Nissan’s operations from Renault — such as selecting the Japanese automaker’s top three executives — would occur.

Were these provisions be violated, however, Nissan would then buy as many shares as it wanted in Renault, and dissolve the alliance.

Renault’s board is set to respond to the proposal December 11. Negotiations between Nissan and Paris continue in the meantime, both sides seeking a compromise to the conflict over governance.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 6 comments
  • Paddan Paddan on Dec 02, 2015

    Will their cars still be butt-ugly?

    • Redliner Redliner on Dec 02, 2015

      Attractive butts everywhere take offense to your phrasing.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on Dec 02, 2015

    Can someone explain why Nissan even partnered with Renault? It appears that Nissan doesn't 'need' Renault anymore. Thanks!

    • See 1 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Dec 03, 2015

      Nissan had financial mismanagement and an aged executive area which did not respond to the changing markets - especially during and after the Japanese housing crash. IIRC, they were mostly made up of the old Prince company execs, not Datsun-Nissan people.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next