Carl Icahn Definitely, Probably Secures Purchase of Pep Boys, Maybe

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Stop us if you’ve heard this one before:

Billionaire investor, activist and horse racing enthusiast Carl Icahn bid to buy Pep Boys on Tuesday for just over $1 billion, outpricing Japanese tire giant Bridgestone for the franchise, Bloomberg reported (via Automotive News).

Bridgestone’s refusal to tender a competing offer after its final bid of $947 million for the 800 Pep Boys stores seemingly means that Icahn is the winner — although we’ve been here before.

Icahn offered up to $18.50 per share of the company, of which he already owns 12 percent, which is slightly higher than the company’s stock during trading Wednesday.

Originally, Pep Boys indicated that a lower offer by Bridgestone would be a better deal, until it read this statement:

“We cannot understand the actions of the directors in that they know we were willing to offer a lot more than $17,” Icahn told Bloomberg on Monday.

Oh, right. Math.

Icahn said in October that the franchise would complement another auto parts retailer that he owns, Auto Plus. That sparked a bidding war between Icahn and Bridgestone that lasted, maybe, up until Wednesday. Pep Boys said it initially balked at Icahn’s offer of $13.50 per share in favor of a $15 per share bid from Bridgestone. Icahn raised his bid to $15.50, which Bridgestone matched, before Icahn offered $16.50. Bridgestone countered at $17 per share, before finally relenting after Icahn’s $18.50 per share bid, according to Marketwatch.

Bridgestone was interested in purchasing the franchise to complement its own 2,200 tire centers in the U.S. and Canada. Icahn may still split the franchise, although his plans weren’t made public. In the deal, Icahn agreed to pay a $39.5 million “breakup” fee to Bridgestone.

CNBC reported the deal with Icahn could be done by the first quarter of 2016. Unless it doesn’t get done.


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Dec 30, 2015

    I wonder when Pep Boys management tires of this and decides to stay independent? Icahn's Auto Plus has full saturation of the lower 48 states and doesn't need the 800 Pep Boys stores. It seems Icahn just wants to keep Bridgestone out of the auto parts business, since it's stores are mainly tire outlets. With Icahn liable to sell off or shut down a large number of Pep Boys stores, why sell out? A hostile takeover would cost Icahn much more than he's offering, and that's the true value of Pep Boys.

  • ClutchCarGo ClutchCarGo on Dec 30, 2015

    Why? I imagine that Pep Boys mgmt stands to profit handsomely from golden parachutes or other incentives in the event that Icahn does anything like that, not to mention what the bidding war has done for their own stock holdings.

  • ToolGuy Good for them, good for me.
  • Tassos While I have been a very satisfied Accord Coupe and CIvic Hatch (both 5-speed) owner for decades (1994-2017 and 1991-2016 respectively), Honda has made a ton of errors later.Its EVs are GM clones. That alone is sufficient for them to sink like a stone. They will bleed billions, and will take them from the billions they make of the Civic, Accord, CRV and Pilot.Its other EVs will be overpriced as most Hondas, and few will buy them. I'd put my money on TOyota and his Hybrid and Plug-in strategy, until breaktrhus significantly improve EVs price and ease of use, so that anybody can have an EV as one's sole car.
  • ToolGuy Good for Honda, good for Canada.Bad for Ohio, how could my President let this happen? lol
  • Tassos A terrible bargain, as are all of Tim's finds, unless they can be had at 1/2 or 1/5th the asking price.For this fugly pig, I would not buy it at any price. My time is too valuable to flip ugly Mitsus.FOr those who know these models, is that silly spoiler in the trunk really functional? And is its size the best for optimizing performance? Really? Why do we never see a GTI or other "hot hatches' and poor man's M3s similarly fitted? Is the EVO trying to pose as a short and fat 70s ROadrunner?Beep beep!
  • Carson D Even Tesla can't make money on EVs anymore. There are far too many being produced, and nowhere near enough people who will settle for one voluntarily. Command economies produce these results. Anyone who thinks that they're smarter than a free market at allocating resources has already revealed that they are not.
Next