Could Volkswagen Skate On A Technicality in Europe?

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

The New York Times is reporting that a loophole in emissions regulations for European cars could keep Volkswagen from paying billions to governments for illegally polluting cars. Regulators considered closing the loophole in 2011, but ultimately failed to do so, which could leave the escape hatch ever-so cracked for Volkswagen to run through.

According to the report, which cites internal meeting notes of European regulators in Geneva, automakers can send through testing cars programmed for special circumstances that daily drivers can’t access.

“A manufacturer could specify a special setting that is not normally used for everyday driving,” British regulators warned in 2011, according to the New York Times.

Last week, Volkswagen chief Paul Willis sent a letter to British Parliament saying that Volkswagen would investigate whether the special mode that the EPA alleged Nov. 2 could allow bigger, V-6 engines to cheat emissions constituted a “defeat device” in Europe.

“I would now like to share with you that we have just received confirmation that the KBA does not regard the use of this technology in the EU as problematic and thus being in line with current regulation,” Willis wrote.

The Gray Lady says it better than I could:

Regulations that apply in Europe say “the settings of the engine and of the vehicle’s controls shall be those prescribed by the manufacturer.”

If manufacturers have the discretion to determine their own engine settings during emissions tests in Europe, it remains unclear if using software to alter engine settings would violate European rules.

The story correctly notes that all sorts of fun can happen in Europe when it comes to emissions tests: seats are taken out, body panels can be taped up, batteries are disconnected, and tires are usually over-inflated.

There is some doubt that Volkswagen could skate, however. In Britain, regulators said that cars must be tested in default modes or worst emission setting, and that those regulations were agreed upon with other European countries.

But Volkswagen could challenge that interpretation and who knows, avoid a few billion bucks in penalties?


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Voyager Voyager on Nov 13, 2015

    German Wirtschaftswoche reports that whistle blowers in Europe, frustrated that the EU did not undertake any action after it was brought to their attention in 2011 already, that the tests were being rigged, decided to notify ICCT, the International Council on Clean Transportation. From there on it landed on the EPA's desk.

  • Samuelmorse Samuelmorse on Nov 13, 2015

    Nothing new here. It was already said from the beginning that while US regulations are explicit in prohibiting test cheating devices, that's not the case in Europe. In fact, not only VW but all car manufacturers contemplate the so called "optimizing fuel consumption and emissions parameters under homologation test procedures" protocol. That simply means that engine electronics are mapping to minimize consumption and emissions in test mode, and that is well known by regulators and of course legal. Given the scandal created by VW in USA, it is clear that EU will change into more stringent test regulations, and this has already been confirmed, but so far VW will save a lot of pain in Europe thanks to this.

  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
  • Zipper69 Honda seem to have a comprehensive range of sedans that sell well.
  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
Next