General Motors Posts Largest Quarterly Profit Since Bankruptcy

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

General Motors announced Wednesday that third quarter, adjusted profit for the company was $3.1 billion, led by truck sales in North America and car sales in China. The net revenue was down $500 million from the same period last year, which GM says is due to currency fluctuations, but the automaker’s profits were decidedly higher.

Automotive News reported that the profit margin was the largest for GM since its 2009 bankruptcy, even after its $1.5 billion charge to settle claims related to its defective ignition switch that resulted in 124 deaths.

The automaker posted an 11.8 percent profit margin — also its largest since 2009 — and said it would end the year above 10 percent.

“These results reflect our work to capitalize on our strengths in the U.S. and China, while taking decisive, proactive steps to mitigate challenges elsewhere,” GM CEO Mary Barra said in a statement.

According to the automaker, trucks largely led the way for increased sales in North America. Chevrolet reported selling 239,000 trucks in the third quarter, up 34,000 from the same quarter last year. GMC sold 146,000 total vehicles in the three months ending on Sept. 30, up from 134,000 last year. In all, North American sales accounted for 931,000 of GM’s 2.3 million worldwide sales.

In China, the automaker reported stronger-than-expected sales. GM posted $463 million pretax profit, a 9.8-percent margin, despite worries that the country’s economy was slowing.

The company’s dwindling South American sales were the only blemish on its accounting report. That region struggled for GM, as its market share shrank from 16.4 percent in the third quarter of 2014 to 14.1 percent for the same period this year. Worldwide, GM’s market share dipped from 11.6 percent to 11.4 percent.

According to Automotive News, GM spent more on incentives during the quarter than last year. The automaker spent 12.3 percent of average transaction price on incentives, compared to 11.4 percent last year. The report noted that average transaction prices rose by more than $500 per vehicle, however.

Shares of GM rose 6 percent Wednesday on the news.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Ralph ShpoilShport Ralph ShpoilShport on Oct 21, 2015

    Yea, GM! Yea!

  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Oct 22, 2015

    “These results reflect our work to capitalize on our strengths in the U.S. and China, while taking decisive, proactive steps to mitigate challenges elsewhere,” GM CEO Mary Barra said in a statement. . . . Uhhh...?

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
Next