2015 Range Rover Sport HSE Review - Thanks For The Memories
2015 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE
My childhood was a bit different than most kids. My mother informed me that when I was 4 years old I didn’t know a cow from a sheep, but I knew the make and model of just about every car on the road.
For that, she was pissed at my father, who would read car magazines to me — not children’s books. It was his insistence to watch things like Camel Trophy and Formula 1 races, and not a soccer games, that has sculpted me into the car nut I am today.
And it was his influence and experience that led me to believe that a certain brand makes the best four-wheel drive, by far.
The current generation of the Range Rover Sport was introduced at the 2013 New York Auto Show, when James Bond himself (who is shorter in real life than I expected) drove one onto the stage. Like before, the front half of the Sport looks almost exactly like the big Range Rover, but behind the B-pillar, the roof and windows slope toward the ground, which I guess is what makes it sporty. Ironically, the smaller Range Rover Sport that is available with a set of small third-row jump seats, and not the big Rover.
Like the big Range Rover, the Sport is available with three engines: a V-6 and V-8, all supercharged; and a new turbocharged diesel. This particular vehicle was equipped with the base 360 horsepower V-6, which never felt underpowered, but didn’t overwhelm, either. The 510-horsepower — or the new, tuned 550-horsepower — V-8 would have been bonkers in this vehicle.
All of Range Rover’s engines are mated to 8-speed automatic transmissions, which, WOT or coasting, always seem to be in the proper gear. The Environmental Protection Agency rates the V-6 Sport at 17/22 mpg in city/highway. Receiving approval from the EPA a day before the VW diesel fiasco broke out, the diesel versions of the two big Range Rovers went on sale last month for the first time on American soil and I can’t wait to drive them.
When it was introduced, Land Rover rightfully made a big deal of the all-aluminum unibody. The Range Rover Sport drives more like a large sport sedan than an SUV, and unlike any Land Rover product before it. The ride is smooth and even the worst road imperfections are absorbed with a quiet thump. The vehicle pictured here had an optional set of 22-inch wheels wrapped in 275/40 Continental Crosscontact tires. These wheels simply felt too big and made me more nervous around potholes and on a dirt road than a capable off-roader should have – I’d stick with the stock wheel and tire size.
The body roll is minimal (disclaimer: years ago I almost rolled a 2001 Discovery on the Merritt Parkway) and its brakes feel solid and do a great job of bringing the 4,800-pound vehicle to a stop in an emergency.
Inside, the dash layout is almost identical to the big Range Rover, which is to say a modern-minimalist design that is both pleasing to the eye and functional.
But nothing is perfect; the infotainment system is slow and dated and there are only two cup-holders. There are no bottle holders in the door pockets, there is no sunglass holder and your phone is forced to live in the center console. In this model, the bottom of the center console was taken up by an electric cooler, which is nice on road trips, and can serve as storage otherwise.
The front seats make up for those annoyances. Adjustable in 16 ways, they are somehow the right size for just about every butt, and padded in a way that forces the driver to keep a proper posture while providing the legendary Range Rover king-of-the-road sitting position. If there is something to complain about, it’s that the seats on the Sport, especially the headrests, are not as soft as on the big Rover. On this HSE model they were both cooled and ventilated, but the massage option wasn’t there. Boo hoo.
The rear seat is a three-passenger bench with a big center arm rest. There is a good amount of legroom, and three adults should comfortable. The seats fold flat and are split 40/20/40, allowing for two rear passengers and items such as skis. With the seats up, the cargo volume is 27.7 cubic feet, 4.4 cubic feet less than the big Rover.
While both Range Rover and Range Rover Sport have the same 115-inch wheelbase, the Sport is 5.6 inches shorter overall. The difference in overall height is 2 inches in favor of the big Range Rover. Those differences, along with the sloping roof of the Sport, add to a significant difference in functional capacity between the two vehicles.
While most Range Rovers are not used to their potential, it is worth noting that the Sport is more than just a pretty face.
The optional Extra Duty Package includes the “Terrain Response2” system, a two-speed transfer-case, active locking center and rear differentials, which works shockingly well and gives the Sport true off-road abilities, as I found out some time ago (read parts 1, 2, 3).
It is interesting that this package is optional; on one side few will ever utilize it, on another, it’s a Range Rover and it should come standard with a 2-speed transfer case. The capacity of the optional roof rack is 165 pounds and the car can ford more than 30 inches of water. The Range Rover Sport can tow up to 7,715 pounds, but the maximum tongue weight is limited to 551 pounds.
The 2015 Range Rover Sports starts at $63,350. The HSE variant seen here starts at $68,295. Front Climate Comfort & Visibility Package adds $2,530. Extra Duty Package, which includes the Terrain Response®2 system and a two-speed transfer-case, is $1,500. Tow package is $900, Meridian audio is $1,940, 22-inch wheels are an eye-watering $3,000, premium paint is $1,800, ebony headliner is $350. InControl App, Remote & Protect is $400, and a dealer installed protection package is $537. Add $100 for California Emissions (really?), $925 for transportation costs, and grand total comes to $82,227.
The Range Rover Sport, like its bigger sibling, is not for everyone. It is expensive and it has somewhat of an undeserving reputation from enthusiasts who have never owned or driven one. Despite loving Land Rovers, my father, much like myself, never owned one, mostly due to their cost. While there are plenty of less expensive vehicles that can do everything that a Range Rover can, only the Range Rover makes many drivers feel special in a way that is difficult to verbalize, and really just needs to be experienced. Should an unexpected seven-figure income come my way, a Land Rover dealership will be the first place I go to.
Kamil Kaluski is the East Coast Editor for Hooniverse.com. His ramblings on Eastern European cars, $500 racers, and other miscellaneous automotive stuff can be found there. This is his last review for this great website. Thank you, it’s been a pleasure.
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC provided the vehicle for the purpose of this review.
ZCD2.7T on Oct 30, 2015
Test-drove an RRS equipped similarly to this one a couple of years ago. Loved pretty much everything about it. In fact, it's the only test-drive I can remember where I got out of the vehicle saying "I GOTTA get me one of these!" Tried to get the wife to test-drive it when we were SUV-shopping earlier this year, but she wouldn't even go to the dealership. Said it looked "too masculine" and she didn't want to be a "Range Rover driver". This from a woman who loves designer bling in almost any other form. Go figure. She loves her Q5 TDi, but I still get misty-eyed whenever we encounter an RRS. Sigh.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- DenverMike When was it ever a mystery? The Fairmont maybe, but only the 4-door "Futura" trim, that was distinctively upscale. The Citation and Volare didn't have competing trims, nor was there a base stripper Maxima at the time, if ever, crank windows, vinyl seats, 2-doors, etc. So it wasn't a "massacre", not even in spirit, just different market segments. It could be that the Maxima was intended to compete with those, but everything coming from Japan at the time had to take it up a notch, if not two.Thanks to the Japanese "voluntary" trade restriction, everything had extra options, if not hard loaded. The restriction limited how many vehicles were shipped, not what they retailed at. So Japanese automakers naturally raised the "price" (or stakes) without raising MSRP. What the dealers charged (gouged) was a different story.Realistically, the Maxima was going up against entry luxury sedans (except Cimarron lol), especially Euro/German, same as the Cressida. It definitely worked in Japanese automaker's favor, not to mention inspiring Lexus, Acura and Infiniti.
- Ronnie Schreiber Hydrocarbon based fuels have become unreliable? More expensive at the moment but I haven't seen any lines gathering around gas stations lately, have you? I'm old enough to remember actual gasoline shortages in 1973 and 1979 (of course, since then there have been many recoverable oil deposits discovered around the world plus the introduction of fracking). Consumers Power is still supplying me with natural gas. I recently went camping and had no problem buying propane.Texas had grid problems last winter because they replaced fossil fueled power plants with wind and solar, which didn't work in the cold weather. That's the definition of unreliable.I'm an "all of the above" guy when it comes to energy: fossil fuels, hydro, wind (where it makes sense), nuclear (including funding for fusion research), and possibly solar.Environmental activists, it seems to me, have no interest in energy diversity. Based on what's happened in Sri Lanka and the push against agriculture in Europe and Canada, I think it's safe to say that some folks want most of us to live like medieval peasants to save the planet for their own private jets.
- Car65688392 thankyou for the information
- Car65688392 Thankyou for your valuable information
- MaintenanceCosts There's no mystery anymore about how the Japanese took over the prestige spot in the US mass market (especially on the west coast) when you realize that this thing was up against the likes of the Fairmont, Citation, and Volaré. A massacre.