Chicken Tax Ready For The Fryer, Hilux Et Al Not Ready For US Market

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

As key free trade agreements near signing, the chicken tax may soon become a bucket of Kentucky fried goodness. Just don’t hold your breath for a Hilux.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreements would dismantle the 25 percent tariff on light-duty trucks like the Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger and Volkswagen Amarok, Automotive News reports. The latter agreement would align vehicle regulations between the United States and European Union, as well.

However, even if the tariff were to come down like the Berlin Wall, imports of the aforementioned trucks — and others like them — won’t be forthcoming in the near term for a few other reasons, starting with how many of the 39 total nations involved in their respective trade agreements have pickup truck plants ready to send their wares to the U.S. There, Thailand — which isn’t among those signing at this time — produces most of the world’s mid-size trucks. However, the nation’s government has expressed interest in joining the TPP after its enactment, leading to potential U.S.-bound production.

Another reason for the delay comes down to the dismantling of the tariff itself, which is set to take years, if not decades, with Japan taking the longest at 25 years; the Japanese rollback is part of a bilateral U.S.-Japan side deal concurrent of the TPP.

Safety figures into this, as well, as trucks made for the global market aren’t made for the U.S.’ special needs. Meanwhile, differences in how trucks are packaged — big blingmobiles for American consumers, spartan utility for everyone else — are likely to stem importation for a while.

Finally, some automakers have concerns their products wouldn’t fare well in the U.S., ranging from product overlap and right-sizing, to brand identity.

In time, however, the trucks some have wanted will board container ships bound for ports on both coasts as automakers would come to see how much profit they could reap with the chicken tax tossed in the fryer, leading to more competition in the USDM truck game down the road.

(Photo credit: Toyota)

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 151 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 30, 2015

    I thought that is why we were negotiating tariffs so that the US could get easier access to China and other Asian countries. You are not correct thinking that we are lifting this tariff without getting something in return. The original purpose of the Chicken Tax was to retaliated against a 25% poultry tax accessed against cheap US poultry imports. The poultry tax against US poultry no longer exists but the tariff against trucks still remains even though other parts of the Chicken Tax have expired. The Chicken Tax has outlived its intended purpose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

    • Pch101 Pch101 on Jun 30, 2015

      Argh. You asked why the tariff remains. Answer: Because the FTA deals have not yet been negotiated. When the US gets an FTA, the chicken tax goes away. If other countries are bothered by the chicken tax, then they had better give us something in return. Until they do, they are still subject to it. (And China is not part of the TPP.)

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 30, 2015

    I thought we were in the process of negotiating the FTA. This will probably happen and we will reach an agreement. If not then this tax will remain in effect until some agreement is reached in the future. As for the Chicken Tax itself if you would bother to read the link you would understand the original purpose of the tariff and why it has outlived its purpose unless of course you are for more taxes.

    • See 8 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Jun 30, 2015

      @Jeff S - So the Chicken tax is antiquated. OK. So are the world's tariffs. And? It can't really be killed, as it's a 'bargaining chip'. If the US drops it out_of_the_blue, what's there to leverage EU crazy 10 to 22% tariffs on import autos? If the Transporter was profitable for VW, why should anyone in the US care? It didn't sell enough to impact the US pickup market, but it's something the US could take away from VW and Europe in general. The Chicken tax was all about retaliation and sending a stern message. That's all it was, regardless of what pundits and idiot trolls read into it today, about it "propping up" the US fullsize pickup market and other BS. The UAW should hate the Chicken tax and EU tariffs if they have any brains. We already have the best and biggest sellers the EU has to offer. The UAW would be the biggest winners involved if all tariffs went away between the two. Use some commonsense and logic. Remember which OEMs would lose the most if there were no more chicken tax nor EU tariffs. Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Nissan, Subaru, Mazda, Kia, VW, etc. Most of these already have a decent foothold in Europe and markets around the world and would then have to compete with Ford, GM, Chrysler, UAW cars and trucks overseas, around the world. And on top of that, global OEMs then entering the US market for the 1st time (or reentering) and competing directly "bread and butter" cars from Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, VW, etc. Think about it this time, instead of just reciting old talking points borrowed from BAFO and his sidekick.

  • Fred I guess this also competes with the Honda HR-V. I'm driving a 2021 and this offers a few improvements, hopefully the driver assists work better, bigger screen, maybe nicer seats. I trust Honda more than Nissan for reliability. I'd miss the magic seats. And then there is the extra $5000 or so it would cost me.
  • Arthur Dailey 143 different interior options! I realize that is now untennable, but still would like more options regarding interior colours, including the instrument panels/dashboards. Black on black is depressing. Drum brakes and no HVAC system. And yet we have 'young whippersnappers' complaining about some modern vehicles being 'penalty boxes'. Try driving a family around in a 1960's stripped VW Beetle during a Canadian winter and then you can start talking about penalty boxes. ;-)Personally that final picture of the red coloured car with the 3/4 view shows it to be just beautifully proportioned. Still retains the P-38 styling finishing in those attractive vertical tail lights. And the horizontal chrome trim along the bottom of the trunk lid adds a nice touch.
  • Jeff Nice to see a more affordable vehicle. For the price it is a lot of vehicle for the money. Dodge needs a vehicle like this.
  • Arthur Dailey Coincidentally we saw a Mazda B series pick-up just the other day in the parking lot of a golf course and I could not help but mention it to my playing partners, both of whom are 'car guys'. One mentioned that his cousin has a 20+ year old base model Ford Ranger that they use for trips to the building and garden supply stores.
  • Tassos THIS MAKES MY 2007 REBUILT BENZ LOOK VERY OBSOLETE. COMPARED TO MY 1991 ACCORD, THAT RISKED DRIVING UNTIL 2016, THIS IS TRULY NEXT LEVEL. IMMIGRANTS LIKE ME ASPIRE TO BUDGET FRIENDLY BECAUSE WE NEED TO MAXIMIZE OUT DOLLAR IN THE FACE OF CONSERVATIVES POLITICIANS DESPISING US AND TRYING TO KEEP US SUBSERVIENT. POLITICIAN CURRENCY!
Next