Playstation GT Academy Winner's GT-R NISMO Flips Into Nurburgring Crowd, Killing Spectator

by Ronnie Schreiber

Published: March 29th, 2015

Warning: Video includes fatal crash

GT Academy is a Sony sponsored competition where contestants can compete, racing on the Playstation sim, for actual rides with factory Nissan teams. Jann Mardenborough won in 2011 and he’s had a successful motorsports career since, winning in both the British GT championship and in the GP3 series. Today, Mardenborough was driving a Nissan GT-R NISMO at a VLN endurance race on the Nürburgring in Germany when the car got airborne at the Flugplatz, flipped and went over the catch fencing into an area where spectators were sitting, killing one and injuring others. Mardenborough was unharmed.

It’s not clear if the spectators were sitting in an approved area or had climbed over one of the fences into a restricted area. While it’s not unusual for cars to get air at the Flugplatz, that’s not why the section of the track is called the “flying place”. That part of the Ring is adjacent to an old airfield.

The accident has already sparked comparisons with the terrible tragedy at LeMans in 1955, when a Mercedes 300SLR didn’t slow on the main straight and got launched over an Austin Healey into the grandstand, spewing parts as it tumbled through the crowd, killing 83 people. In terms of what possibly caused the flip, though, Mardenborough’s accident is more reminiscent of the Mercedes Benz CLR endurance racer that flew and flipped multiple times while airborne at LeMans in 1999. Here’s an explanation of the aerodynamics involved in the CLR’s flip.

More recently, in NASCAR, Carl Edwards’ and Kyle Larson’s cars have gotten airborne and into the catch fencing, and while it wasn’t due to aero issues, at the 2011 LeMans race, driver Alan McNish’s Audi R18 slid through a gravel runoff area and into some tire barriers, flipping the car up and almost into a trackside photographers’ area. While there were no spectators involved, Indycar’s most recent fatality took the life of racer Dan Wheldon when his open wheel car got airborne and flipped him headfirst into the catch fence.

Auto racing has changed for the better since it was a true blood sport in the 1960s. The drivers are so much safer today due to great advancements in racing safety technology, like the SAFER barriers and the HANS device. Less attention, however, has been paid to spectator safety. All of us who have ever attended a sporting event and read the fine print on the back of the ticket know what implied risk means. Still, there’s always room for improvement and keeping the cars on the track should be one of the highest priorities for racetrack operators.

VLN’s statement:

In the opening round of the VLN Endurance Championship Nürburgring an accident happened on Saturday, in which several spectators were injured. One of them died despite immediately initiated rescue operations in the Medical Center of the circuit. The other injured spectators were taken for further medical care to the hospital. The race was stopped to allow quick access to the scene of the rescue services and not restarted. In the stretch airfield a participant vehicle drove off yet unknown reason from the track and came out from behind the safety features of the circuit to a halt. The VLN and the organizer of the race are deeply saddened and her thoughts are with the families and friends of the victims.
Our thoughts are with the friends and family of the deceased.

NISMO’s statement.

The driver, Jann Mardenborough got out of the car and, after initial checks in the circuit Medical Centre, has been taken to hospital for further routine checks.

Today’s events have been a tragedy. We are all deeply shocked and saddened by these events and our immediate thoughts go to the deceased, those injured and their families and friends.

The team is fully co-operating with the race organisers to conduct an immediate and thorough investigation into this incident.

TTAC joins those organizations in offering our prayers and thoughts with the injured and the family and friends of the as yet unidentified spectator who was killed.

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS

#GtAcademy #JannMardenborough #NissanGt-rNismo #Nurburgring #RacingFatalities #VLN

Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 17 comments

Corey Lewis on Mar 30, 2015

I have no comment, other than those CLR's were brilliant looking.

Like Reply
Vaujot on Mar 30, 2015

I know somebody who participated in that race. He commented on our club's board that drivers familiar with the Ring will lift or even lightly brake before and on that crest to move weight forward. In other words, lack of driver experience may have played a role in the accident. As regards the two fences and the victim's location: German news reports have been saying that he was in a spectator area and I am pretty sure, it would have been reported if the spectator had been in a place he was not supposed to be. Apparently the second smaller fence is to keep people out of the forest (nature preservation measure).

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.