The Early Cayman GT4 Reviews Are Arriving

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

The first round of reviews for the Porsche Cayman GT4 is coming in this week. Unsurprisingly, they are all rather hosanna-esque in nature; Porsche PR won’t permit anything less. With that said, this is the combination of Porker-LEGOS for which a lot of people have been asking for a long time, and there are some interesting tidbits from the reviews, summarized below.

* “Production capacity” limits the GT4 to 2500 units worldwide and about half that for the US. Surely the limiting factor here is a product of Porsche’s own imagination because the GT4 does not appear to have any unobtanium parts or difficult third-party sourcing. This will probably cause a bit of a bidding war at some Porsche dealers, so be prepared.

* The body-in-white is supposedly reinforced in a few different areas and is unique to the GT4.

* Front suspension is from the 911 GT3. The rear suspension is unique to the Cayman. Wheels are five-bolt, not center-lock.

* Like the Nissan 370Z, the GT4 has an automatic rev-matching feature for downshifts. It can be disabled.

* My friend at Road&Track, Jason Cammisa, found understeer at the limit.

* There’s a Nurburgring time, of course, that time being 7m40s.

Equipped to match my 2004 Boxster Anniversary, minus the special-equipment leather from my car and without carbon brakes, the GT4 checks in at about ninety-four thousand dollars. In Porsche-land, this amounts to a bargain; my Boxster’s MSRP of $61,450 adjusted for inflation is seventy-nine grand today, for a car with 115 fewer horsepower, less impressive running gear, and the infamous M96 engine. If you can find a dealer to sell you the car at sticker, you might want to consider getting one.

Alternately, for less money you can get a Corvette Z06 or the base $84,995 Dodge Viper. The blah-blah of Ring times aside, I cannot adequately convey how much faster either one of those cars would be around any racetrack of any size in even remotely capable hands. If you don’t care about racetrack times, then forget the Cayman GT4 entirely and get a Boxster. The top goes down, which is nice on sunny days and makes for very nice first dates.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on Mar 11, 2015

    If you don’t care about racetrack times or badges, then forget the Cayman GT4 entirely and get a Miata. The top goes down, which is nice on sunny days and makes for very nice first dates, and the TCO is very reasonable. Fixed.

  • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Mar 12, 2015

    I have a question for the Porsche owners, as someone who has considered a used Cayman purchase for years. How do you overcome the stereotype that Porsche owners are jerks? Not trying to be a troll in any way - this is an earnest question.

    • Waftable Torque Waftable Torque on Mar 12, 2015

      My suggestion would be to dress up when driving one. Put on a sport shirt and blazer instead of an Ed Hardy T-shirt and baseball cap. A high status car and low status driver leads most observers to the same mental shortcut: "douche bag".

  • Wolfwagen Pennsylvania - Two long straights, 1 medium straight, 1 super short straight and a bunch of curves all on one end
  • Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
  • Redapple2 Telluride over Acadian (sic-tip cap-canada). 1 better car. 2 60 % us/can content vs 39 THIRTY NINE for an "American" car. 3 no UAW labor. Smart people drive Tellurides. Not so smart for the GMC. Dont support the Evil GM Vampire.!
  • Theflyersfan My dad had a 1998 C280 that was rock solid reliable until around 80,000 miles and then it wasn't. Corey might develop a slight right eyelid twitch right about now, but it started with a sunroof that leaked. And the water likely damaged some electric components because soon after the leaks developed, the sunroof stopped working. And then the electrical gremlins took hold. Displays that flickered at times, lights that sometimes decided illumination was for wimps so stayed home, and then the single wiper issue. That thing decided to eat motors. He loved that car but knew when to fold the hand. So he bought a lightly used, off lease E-class. Had that for less than two years before he was ready to leave it in South Philly, keys in the ignition, doors unlocked, and a "Take it please" sign on the windshield. He won't touch another Benz now.
  • Detlump A lot of people buy SUVs because they're easier to get in and out of. After decades of longer, lower, wider it was refreshing to have easier ingress/egress offered by an SUV.Ironically, the ease of getting in and out of my Highlander is very similar to my 56 Cadillac.
Next