By on September 4, 2014

Distracted Driving Canadian Style

Until the overlords at Google bestow their technocratic utopia of automation to every new vehicle leaving the factory, distracted driving will remain a problem in need of a solution, such as the one General Motors has in mind.

Autoblog reports GM is working on a three-way deal with Seeing Machines and Takata to install 500,000 cameras in its line of vehicles within a three- to five-year period. The cameras will track eye and head movements to determine if a driver is paying attention to the road or to the office BlackBerry, then alerting them so as to not miss the stop sign or other hazards.

Seeing Machine CEO Ken Kroeger says there could be other uses to the cameras, citing safety’s lack of sexiness. Such future uses could include anti-theft systems, ignition interlocks programmed to prevent a young driver from taking the car out past curfew, or apps that can trigger an action inside the vehicle while driving.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

25 Comments on “General Motors Looks To Cameras To Solve Distracted Driving...”


  • avatar
    geozinger

    I’m guessing the pic for this post was shot in Canada? Cloudy skies, Timmy’s coffee, a Blackberry and a car speedo in KM/H?

  • avatar
    petezeiss

    “then alerting them so as to not miss the stop sign or other hazards”

    I’d rather it just pulled the car over, stopped the engine and then shot the driver through the head.

  • avatar
    Car Ramrod

    Could be an old pathfinder

  • avatar
    -Nate

    How am I supposed to look at the road ahead when the Churches on Crenshaw Blvd. are letting out ? .

    Last time I foolishly drove by there mid Sunday , I nearly hit a parked car .

    -Nate

  • avatar
    mikey

    @ Nate Too many land mines ,so I’m not going to expand on your comment. I do ,however, know exactly what your saying.

  • avatar
    don1967

    What could possibly be less reliable than a GM ignition switch? Why, a GM ignition switch wired into a digital camera with face-recognition software, of course.

  • avatar
    Tim_Turbo

    We have had Timmys here in Maine since 2000 or so I believe.

    I despise phone use while driving. That being said-with the Blackberry I could fire off the rare text/email while driving without looking at the phone at all due to the keyboard layout.

    With the iphone and other touchscreen phones I have had since I don’t even bother to try. And voice to text hates me. So whatever it is, it can wait.

  • avatar
    tankinbeans

    Gag. The backup camera I have is nice, but come on people, why is it so hard to put the detritus down and drive the 2-ton projectile? Phones should come with HAL from 2001: A Space Odyssey as standard saying, “I’m afraid I can’t do that Dave.” and rendering the phone inopperable.

  • avatar
    JREwing

    Regardless of the epidemic of using mobile devices while driving, I’m incensed by the idea that a computer in the car is going to start throwing a fit whenever it decides I’m not paying enough attention.

    I’m already unhappy that we have sensors and computer controls encouraging people to continue to be inattentive (with backup sensors, blind-spot monitoring, lane-deviation monitoring, etc). Now that we have this in place, people will simply rely on the buzzer to tell them when they haven’t paid enough attention to the road ahead.

    I could easily see the warning buzzer further distracting the inattentive, extending the time it takes for the driver to refocus on the road.

    There’s going to be a generation of drivers who will seek out ’90’s and 2000’s automobiles for the simple reason that there won’t be a computer constantly nagging them about their driving.

    • 0 avatar
      tankinbeans

      I wonder when the inevitable, “I cut the bloke off because my car didn’t beep” when switching from a car that has all this crap to one that doesn’t, as when borrowing another car, will happen.

      I already notice the blond spot detection system in others’ Chrysler/VW mommy vans. I can see the lit triangle from a car length and a half away. It’s ridiculous.

  • avatar
    IHateCars

    Gimme a Large double/double!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Jarred Fitzgerald: Well, that’s China for you, always with the “imitation game.” Though I have to...
  • threeer: My sister bought a 1997 Toyota Tercel under the guise of needing a cheap and economical commuter car. We...
  • focaltac: More like Tigershart.
  • Deontologist: Vehicle suddenly shuts off due to excessive oil consumption? Wouldn’t that involve ignoring the...
  • Superdessucke: With these emissions problem, would Tiger Shart be an appropriate nickname?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber