Junkyard Find: 1970 Ford Fairlane 500 Station Wagon

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

We haven’t seen a Ford Fairlane in this series since this ’65 sedan, way back in 2010. We see station wagons here all the time, of course, the last couple being this ’66 Toyota crown and this ’86 Nissan Maxima. Our most recent Detroit station wagon Junkyard Find was this ’72 Pinto (or this ’60 Valiant, if you don’t consider the Pinto to be a proper Detroit station wagon). This ’70 Fairlane is rare indeed; I can’t recall having seen any midsize Ford wagon of this vintage on the street or in the junkyard for many years.

There’s a lot of nostalgia for the big American family wagons among some of us who grew up in the 1960s and 1970s, though most of those cars are the full-sized machines built on the Galaxie/Impala/Fury/Ambassador platforms, not the smaller midsize ones such as this Fairlane. My family never had a station wagon, preferring the Chevy Beauville passenger van as our family-outing-mobile.

Windsor V8 with an enormous AC compressor, the same thing you saw under the hoods of millions of Fairlanes, Montegos, Torinos, Cyclones, and Rancheros of the era.

This one took kids to soccer practice 40 years ago.

Guam pride!

It’s not rusty and wouldn’t be a huge challenge to restore, but the love of old wagons among Generation X types hasn’t translated into much real-world willingness to spend money and time fixing them up.


The ’68 was an earlier generation of this platform, but it had the same “action size” as the ’70.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Johnster Johnster on Aug 14, 2014

    I'm surprised that no one has yet commented on how the 1966-70 Ford Fairlane and Torino station wagons shared their bodyshell with the 1966-70 Ford Falcon station wagons. I think everyone knows how the original 1962 mid-sized Ford Fairlane and Mercury Meteor chassis were based on the chassis from the Ford Falcon and the Comet, but were both wider and had longer wheel-bases. When the Falcon was redesigned for the 1966 model year, it was moved to the wider chassis of the Fairlane, although Falcon 2 and 4-door sedans had a shorter wheelbase than Fairlane 2 and 4-door sedans, hardtop coupes and convertibles. (The 1966 model year also saw the Mercury Comet move from being a compact car to sharing its chassis and wheelbase with the mid-sized Ford Fairlane.) 1966 Falcon and Fairlane station wagon were built on a wheelbase sized between the other Falcons and Fairlanes. They shared the same wheelbase and body-shell. The only difference was the front-end clip. The 1966 Mercury Comet station wagon shared the same wheelbase as the Fairlane and Falcon station wagons, as did the Ford Ranchero. (You will remember how the 1966 Ranchero used the Falcon front-end clip, while the 1967 Ranchero used the Fairlane front-end clip. There really weren't many changes other than the front-end clip, but it was felt that the Fairlane styling would allow it to compete better with the Chevelle-based El Camino.) I remember how back in the late 1960s Consumer Reports classified the Falcon station wagon as a "mid-sized" station wagon along with the Fairlane and it really surprised people who considered it more of a rival to the Rambler American because of how the Falcon was marketed. In 1970 the Ford Fairlane and Torino, and the Mercury Montego and Cyclone all got new sheet metal, wagons included, but were still built on the same basic chassis as before. There was a short-run of early 1970 Falcons that were nearly identical to the 1969 Falcons, then there was the 1970 1/2 Ford Falcon that was really just a stripped-down Ford Fairlane. In 1971, the Ford Torino and Mercury Montego and Cyclone continued with only minor trim changes, but the Falcon and Fairlane names were dropped.

  • Bill mcgee Bill mcgee on Aug 15, 2014

    Johnster thanx for bringing this up, as briefly I owned a 1966 Falcon wagon , a pretty basic one with " three-on-the-tree and no A.C." that I bought for maybe $ 100 in Austin in 1976 . It really was more of a mid-size car , not like the older Falcons . Shortly after I bought it , it caught fire on the recently opened MoPac freeway . I left it smoldering by the side of the road and walked home .

    • 70-Tbird 70-Tbird on Sep 15, 2014

      I live close to austin, "Recently opened mopac freeway" made me laugh.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next