Junkyard Find: 1982 Ford Thunderbird Town Landau

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin
junkyard find 1982 ford thunderbird town landau

Ford may have squeezed even more vehicles out of their Fox platform than Chrysler got with their roughly contemporary K platform and derivatives, and the range of cars was just about as broad. Though Foxes are very plentiful in high-turnover self-service wrecking yards, I let most of them go to The Crusher undocumented. We’ve seen this ’79 Mustang Indy 500 Pace Car, this ’80 Mercury Capri, and this ’82 Mercury Zephyr so far in this series, and today we’ll add another Malaise Era Fox. Yes, there was a Fox Thunderbird with squared-off, Fairmont-style body, available for the 1980 through 1982 model years. Not many of these cars were sold, so today’s find— in Denver— is a rare one.

1982 Ford Thunderbird Commercial

Ford’s marketers did their best, but the Thunderbird name had fallen on hard times. Again.

Heritage split bench seats in Midnight Blue!

These Midnight Blue seats have lost some of their luster after 31 years, but you can imagine how Barcalounger-like they must have been when new.

Detroit stuck with the “wire wheel” hubcap concept well into the 1990s, but the middle 1980s were the pinnacle of the style.

The Town Landau emblems are gone, but the landau roof remains.

The interesting thing about these Foxes is that just about everything mechanical, plus unexpected stuff like dash panels, is bolt-on interchangeable between cars. You can swap in the drivetrain and suspension out of, say, a ’93 Mustang SVT Cobra into an ’82 T-Bird with a minimum of modifications. Or you could install the Heritage Split Bench seats out of an ’82 T-Bird into your Mustang.

Join the conversation
2 of 67 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Oct 15, 2013

    The 80-82 Birds and Cougars were a victim of the times in a way. The 77-79 models were too large, heavy and fuel thirsty but still sold well. Ford's only real option was to use the plentiful and available Fox platform and to carry on the traditional look in a new smaller, lighter more efficient package. The 4 speed AOD transmission, electronic instrument cluster and keyless entry system were much ballyhooed innovations. The 302 V8 with the optional TRX suspension suspension package meant that these cars not only accelerated better but out handled there predecessors by a huge margin. By 1980 standards performance was on the way out, V8 was a swear word, emissions and fuel mileage were ever important and padded Landau roof treatments and tufted pillow top seats were quickly taking over in it's place. it wasn't until 1983 when Ford took these cars in a very different direction with much of the exterior trim and chrome removed and the interiors were toned down big time. That plus aero was the in thing with rounder and slippery shapes replacing the square formal lines. Many condemn the 80-82 cars as the worst T-birds but that title IMO goes to the 77-79's which were too large, heavy, slow and thirsty. The 80-82 drove so much more sharper with the rack and pinion steering and the 302 equipped models were peppy for there day and ripe for modification. The 1982 model here was the worst as far as performance. The base engine was the sluggish 88 HP 200 straight six tied to the 3 speed automatic. Next up on the option's list was Ford's new lightweight 3.8 liter Essex V6 with 105 HP and also tied to a 3 speed automatic. The top option was the 111 HP 4.2 liter 255 V8 tied to the 4 speed AOD transmission as the 302 was dropped off the option list. Of course there was no Turbo coupe yet available as the 2.3 turbo wasn't yet introduced into this line. That all changed for 1983 of course with a new aero body, Throttle body injection, wider use of the AOD transmission, a far more sparse exterior and interior and greater emphasis on sport and handling than ever before.

  • Graham64 Graham64 on Aug 20, 2020

    "The Town Landau emblems are gone, but the landau roof remains." Not for much longer though :-)

  • MrIcky Unimogs
  • Parkave231 On the one hand, I always thought that TriPower was a horrible name for the L3B engine (and LSY, although I don't recall seeing that name applied in practice), especially since one of the three technologies reduces said power (AFM). Of all the historic GM names to bring back...On the other hand, TurboMAX is a horrible replacement name. Turbo-Quad4? (Yes, I know it's not.) FleetFour? (Seemingly target market?) FourReal?
  • SCE to AUX The diesel isn't that compelling compared to the 2.7T, when you consider the 50% fuel cost premium and the need for DEF.But regularly towing 9500 lbs with a 4-cylinder (even a low-stress one like this) seems to be overdoing it. I'd get the 4 for lighter duty, the diesel for medium duty, and one of the 8s for heavy duty.
  • Analoggrotto Over the years GM has shown a keen interest in focusing their attention and development money on large, expensive or specialized vehicles and little to no progress in developing something excellent to complete with such class leaders as : Camry, Telluride, Civic, CR-V, Highlander, Accord, or even ho hum Corolla. And this is the way class division works in the heartland/rustbelt: pretend to care for the common man but cater the public resources to additional security and comfort for the upper echelons of society. GM is Elitist American Communism.
  • Art Vandelay Current Fiesta ST