Time For The "Apple-Style" Product Launch?

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Our NAIAS preview post revealed a common theme of dissatisfaction with the slow-striptease style of product reveals, where manufacturers “leak” teaser shots ad nauseam in the run-up to a product launch. It seems the readers are tired of it, and frankly, I am too. So what’s to be done about it?

Reader Jaydez summed up the collective discontent occurring among enthusiasts with respect to the slow reveal

Unfortunately with all the advance attention that all new cars get between “leaks” spy shots, and guesses, nothing is a surprise when it is revealed with smoke and fireworks on a stage. I’m bored with it all. I wish at least one company would use the Apple model for revealing new products. Don’t release ANY information and make sure your employees abide by that too. Reveal it on stage at a big event, like the NAIAS, and follow it with, “you can build it online tonight. Order it at your dealer tomorrow. Production is already underway and deliveries will begin in 2 weeks.

THAT would be worth tuning in for. Until then I will just look at the pictures with the same unenthusiastic manner I have been in the last few years.

I for one, would welcome a return to the days when a new product launch was a big event. You had to wait for one of the buff books to do a feature on it, or perhaps log on to a poorly laid out car site to see a grainy digital image of the car. The real OGs no doubt remember one crappy snapshot appearing in the local paper’s Auto section.

But the current system of annoying teasers is here to stay. The key thing to recognize with this problem is that the slow reveal benefits two parties; the OEMs, who get “exposure” for the “brand” and most importantly, auto bloggers. I wrote a brief rant about this in February, but the point remains the same

It’s a symbiotic relationship between the OEM and the media that’s unlikely to change, given the dysfunctional economics of blogging, that rewards speed, sensationalism and superficial content (which generate clicks) over the kind of slow, measured, in-depth work that the foundations of real in-depth journalism are built on. The kind of content that takes time and money to produce, bores many readers because it’s over 800 words long and often gets displaced in the article hierarchy because a new Toyonda Camcord Juicy Couture Special Edition was released and if we’re not first at re-hashing the press release and stock photos, we’ll be rendered irrelevant.

Jaydez’s formula for a highly secretive launch with no leaks could very well lead to the same kind of frenzied hype – perhaps intensified due to the lack of information available. The less reputable blogs could even resort to the same sort of conjecture and rumors that tech blogs fall back on in the run-up to an Apple launch. It’s not like they don’t already publish erroneous and incorrect automotive info anyways. Unfortunately, it’s unlike that any of the OEMs will take the first step, since the current formula seems to be “working”.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Jellodyne Jellodyne on Jan 11, 2013

    None of this is going to change, the car companies couldn't do it if they wanted to. 1. You can't road test cars in secret. You can't do it indoors. 2. Car People want to know about upcoming models. Someone's going to pay something for the spy shots. 3. The Internet. You can't keep secrets anymore. Heck, ask Apple. At least you're not going to get people leaving 2014 Corvettes at a bar. You just can't control information prior to release like you used to. Imagine a dealership papering up its windows these days. All well and good, unless one of your employees has a camera phone. I mean, if it weren't for the fact that every car dealership employee has the highest of moral scruples and is fully pleased with, satisfied by and obedient to the company they work for. So car companies can either ignore the fact that all this information is going to leak out and ruin their reveal anyway, or they can try to guide and tweak it by handing out teasers here, exclusives there, maybe some NDAs for the big boys, but not so strict they end up getting scooped by the little guys with no NDA.

  • Ckb Ckb on Jan 12, 2013

    Your 1. (Edit: meant to be a response to Jellodyne's post) was my first thought too. A smartphone is much easier to conceal in public than a car is (mistakes like the bar incident notwithstanding). Even though both products need to be tested "in the wild" extensively before release, its a fundamentally different problem. A prototype phone in a case looks like any other phone in a case but when they put stuff on a new car and call it camouflage, they make it a rolling oxymoron. But that doesn't mean OEMs can't pull back on all the "teaser" shots...

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next