Marchionne Calls For EU Intervention, End Of Free Trade

by Bertel Schmitt

Published: October 10th, 2012

It looks like Fiat and Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne does not want to be head of the European automakers association ACEA much longer. Today, he called for a massive EU rescue package for the ailing European car industry, with coordinated capacity cuts as the centerpiece. He also called for a stop of free trade agreements. “Let the European car industry make its adjustments… This is not the time to embrace free trade,” Marchionne said while Reuters was taking notes.

Earlier this year, Marchionne had called for a massive government intervention that would require all automakers to shed capacity, most likely with financial support from Brussels. At the time, an anonymous European auto exec predicted serious pushback from the German side, which is doing just fine, danke. The German side did not waste time. To the delight of the EU, which has other problems, the German members of the ACEA did not support Marchionne’s plan, and it went nowhere. They also started working on Marchionne’s ouster. Soon thereafter, Volkswagen demanded that Marchionne step down as the head of the lobbying group, after Marchionne accused Volkswagen of dumping.

Last month, Marchionne said that ACEA’s board agreed all members would reach their own decisions. He also hugged Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn in front of cameras. “They hugged, but they did not kiss,” quipped Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche.

All of this seems to be forgotten, and Marchionne calls for the strong arm of Brussels again. Marchionne also said the EU should delay signing free trade agreements. When he said this before, it earned him a serious rebuke from EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht. Export-heavy German carmakers and export-heavy EU states are for FTAs. It seems like Marchionne is under a lot of stress, and the way he is going, he might be under more stress soon.

#ACEA #BertelSchmitt #Capacity #EU #Fiat #FTA #Italy #Marchionne

Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 36 comments

Schmitt trigger on Oct 11, 2012

"A TTAC “Bailout” definition primer:" Larry, excellent primer. All that it is missing is to replace the word "Brussels" with "Washington".

Like Reply
NMGOM on Oct 11, 2012

I must say, I had been a fan of the flamboyant, folksy, sweater-wearing, conversational Sergio. And A fan of his good leadership at Chrysler, including the image building SRT Viper and new Ram 1500. But this has gone too far. For the EU to curtail FTA's would fly in the face of its own desire for economic progress AND influence around the world. And it certainly represents a betrayal of Sergio's public agreement with Mr. Winterkorn. And it would again burden the people in "rich states" that have efficiently running companies, requiring them to spend their taxes saving people in poor states with car companies that can't do well. If that isn't ever Communism, what is?....except here among states not people. The Germans are already going to carry the bulk of the financial burden trying to save Greece. You certainly don't hear about great Italian car companies like Ferrari, Lamborghini, and Pagani crying for help, do you? Maybe Fiat should take a lesson from them and start making upscale, decent cars. "stroker49" was right. If the destiny of VW is to rule Europe in the automotive realm, then so be it. (I can hear BMW and Mercedes screaming already.) If Fiat cannot survive on its own merits, then it needs to go under: so be it. Carrying dead wood does little other than hurt your back and make suitable kindling. And, no, I was not in favor of the GM-and-Chrysler "bailout" (as formulated: the structured bankruptcy should have reverted the component divisions back into their individual original companies, --- then we could have some really good competition here.) ------------

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Th009 on Oct 12, 2012
  
  Ferrari is actually owned by Fiat, Lamborghini by Volkswagen. Given Pagani's cars are handcrafted and priced in the millions, Fiat is really the only independent manufacturer/manufacturing group in Italy.
  
  Like
- NMGOM on Oct 12, 2012
  
  @th009 Yup, thanks "th009"... Ferrari is "loosely" owned by Fiat (meaning they keep hands off, per agreement); Lambo is quite "tightly" owned by VW and even uses Audi parts; and Pagani is indeed independent, but you can still pick up a current Zonda F (not Huayra) for only €480K in Europe. (See price list). A few years ago, a Zonda F (NOT the "R") would have been about $320K, but now the price has gone up to about $600K stateside. But it has a manual transmission, and Huayra does not! (See links: the YouTube video is fun!). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIoFnfMhq_Y http://www.pagani.com/it/default.aspx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagani_Zonda http://www.insideline.com/pagani/2012-pagani-huayra-first-look.html http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/the-pagani-zonda-f-price-list.6848/ ===============
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.