GM Throws In The Towel On Hummer

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

After a lot of to and fro, GM today officially gave up on the Hummer deal. Reuters reports that “General Motors Co will wind down its Hummer SUV line after failing to complete a deal to sell the brand to China’s Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co.”

“We are disappointed that the deal with Tengzhong could not be completed,” John Smith, GM’s outgoing vice president of corporate planning and alliances, said in a statement. This is the last in a row of failed deals Smith misengineered.

Shanghai Daily says that “Wang Chao, an assistant commerce minister, reiterated at a briefing yesterday that the ministry had yet to receive an application, and any reports that the ministry had rejected the bid were untrue.”

The ministry had been on record several times that it had not received a proper application.

Late last year, China’s Commerce Ministry had not received a formal application. Finally, one came in. Beijing bureaucrats could not make heads or tails of what Tengzhong was really trying to buy (or rather, what GM was trying to sell or not to sell.) Tengzhong was ordered to go home and come back with a new application that details what Tengzhong is exactly getting for their money. Ever since, the Ministry had been waiting for something to approve, but nothing was forthcoming.

According to China’s government, there was nothing to approve, and nothing to reject. However, this is widely seen as a face saving move. Chinese government circles were never enthused about an obscure industrial equipment maker trying to buy a money-losing brand that had become the epitome of vehicular excess. China has a very successful joint venture between GM and SAIC. The government may not have wanted to step on those toes. Someone at GM should have listened more closely.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 84 comments
  • Autojunkie Autojunkie on Feb 25, 2010

    @ littlehulkster +1 @ RMWill +1

  • Geeber Geeber on Feb 25, 2010

    What bothered me about the HUMMER was that it was a triumph of style over substance. I remember looking at one a few years ago and being shocked at the amount of orange peel in the paint. Apparently HUMMERS were painted by Sunkist. It became a status symbol for a short time. In many ways, it was the polar opposite of the suicide-door Lincolns featured in a "Curbside Classic" article a few weeks back. Those Lincolns were a real attempt to bring a high-quality, tasteful luxury vehicle to the marketplace. The elegance and quality were more than skin deep. The HUMMER was a cynical attempt to sell the sizzle, without much (if any) steak. If those Lincolns were a perfect fit for Jackie Kennedy, the HUMMER was a perfect fit for the Jersey Shore girls. In some ways, it was the poster child for why the American auto industry in general, and GM in particular, are on the ropes.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next